Text  Larger | Smaller | Default

NewsNow

Gives us a smile, Sam


Filed: Tuesday, 13th November 2012
By: Paul Walker


Well, itĎs fair to say I hadnĎt really seen this coming. And I bet that goes for a large amount of Irons fans.

But itís certainly welcome. Sixth in the Premier League, 18 points already from 11 games - thatĎs not even a third of the season - and a big gap opening up between ourselves and the bottom three.

The outstanding victory at Newcastle has established us as a club of serious intent, well organised, supremely professional and full of commitment to the shirt.

Coming on the back of a confident, controlled, well planned point against Manchester City, suddenly our standing as a cause for serious debate has become apparent.

And donít forget it came the same weekend as we beat the mighty Arsenal at reserve and youth level to underlined the fact that the Academy is still running nicely, thank you.

All this might just bring a smile to Big Samís face, well almost. Sam doesnít really do smiles, he just does what he keeps telling us he does best. Manage successfully in the top flight. And itís becoming hard to argue against his inbuilt arrogance.

In fact I bet he is quietly delighted at the sound of so many people eating humble pie. Sam arrived at the Boleyn with an image he didnít like, and one many of our fans didnít like much. Then he gave his old mucker Kevin Nolan - at 30 - an eye-watering five-year contract, setting the tough Scouser up for life, something Newcastle refused to do.

Too old. Too slow and not good enough for Pardewís upwardly mobile Newcastle, with their European aspirations, was a well worn theme.

None of this went down too well amongst some Hammers fans. But who can say now that the plan hasnít worked? Blimey, the old long ball merchant saw his team described as ďstylishĒ after the deserved draw with champions.

Yes, I blinked a bit at that too. But it must be right because it was in the Sunday Telegraph! If that didnít make Sam smile he should have been laughing his little cotton socks off during last week of Champions League action.

Firstly we were told that Stoke, Newcastle and Everton play more long balls than we do (thatís ones over 35 yards, not the 20-yard version of the stats that put us behind Real Madrid and Barcelona a couple of weeks ago. Oh how we laughed.)

Then we witnessed our betters using the same long ball so ridiculed when Sam uses it. I wish this long ball stuff would go away, itís been shown to be a myth because everyone uses it sometimes, and everyone knows how to mix it up. Jack Collison and Mark Noble both said as much in TV interviews recently.

Incidentally, itís good to see Collison nearing a return. His knee injury was a shocker and we should not forget that he put his career on the line playing far too many matches at the back end of last season to help us secure promotion.

TV viewers last week would have seen three goals that Sam would be proud of, but nobody complained. Firstly Liverpool - yes Brendan Rodgers' short-passing heroes - utilised a 70-yard long ball from Jose Enrique to Luis Suarez, who admittedly controlled it superbly as it fell into the box before tip-toeing round Tim Krul to net the equaliser against Newcastle.

Then there was Joe Hart launching the ball downfield for Mario Balotelli to flick on to allow Sergio Aguero an equaliser against Ajax. And of course there was the long punt from Celtic íkeeper Fraser Forster, missed by Javier Mascherano to allow teenager Tony Watt immortality with the second and eventual winner against Barcelona. Just imagine the abuse we would have suffered had Samís side scored goals like that. But not a word.

Even Pardew was banging on about ďthe way they (us) play, all stop-start and set pieces into the box.Ē As if our ex-manager had never ordered the ball to be pumped forward for Demba Ba.This is all getting really boring, donít you think?

My natural pessimism - come on, Iíve been watching the Irons for over 50 years - had me suggesting we would be fortunate to get six points from the 12 tougher games that followed our 4-1 win over Southampton. And weíve already got four.

Yes, we still do need 22 more points to reach the accepted 40 point mark, but we are a darned sight closer to our goal than the bottom three.

QPR, winless with four points, need to take 36 points from their final 27 league matches to get to 40. Southampton need 35 from 27 while Reading need 32 from 28.

I still doubt we can hang on to such a lofty sixth place with Spurs, Manchester United, Chelsea, Liverpool, Everton and Arsenal before the turn of the year. But we are growing into a confident, determined team who know how to shut-out games, who understand the system and shape that Sam wants and have an excellent, Nolan-inspired, team spirit.

Andy Carroll, who finished Sunday's game as a extra defender, Mo Diame, Mark Noble and Jussi Jaaskelainen are having fine seasons.

And if we do stay in the top half, Sam may well find that the January transfer window will be interesting. Last season we found it hard to attract our targets while in the Championship. This summer, it was just as hard to get top players to take the risk of joining a newly promoted club.

Now it may start to change. Nicholas Anelka and Joe Cole are already being linked with the club, and the more we look the part in the top flight, the easier it will become to improve our squad.

So far it has been an enlightening season, the only annoying bit has been the continued shambles of the Olympic stadium bid.

Part of me wants to tell the politicians and organisers that they are getting what they deserve. The stadium build was flawed from the start. The wrong design - why a circle? - and a total failure to accept that only top-flight football would provide a genuine future.

But no, the arrogant Coe-led athletics fraternity didnít want to rub shoulders with the over-paid (their view) world of professional football. They demanded an athletics-led stadium for the future.

And the man who designed such a nonsense was the one who complained to the EU about public money being spent on a professional football clubís bid.

So now they have a stadium that is empty, with no hope that it can be re-structured for at least three more years. And it is public money that is being spent just keeping an empty shell ticking over.

The government donít want to spend money on refurbishment to allow top football to be staged there. But without retractable seating, corporate facilities and better toilets (Iím not sure I understand that last one, what is already there?) it cannot be used for football.

If we are only going to be tenants, why should we foot the bill? Would you pay to have a new bathroom put into a council house, surely not.

Now the authorities are in a mess. Just like they were over the Dome. Motor racing will not pay the bills, Orient certainly wonít and there are only so many world class rock stars who can fill 80,000 seats.

Athletics certainly wonít fill the stadium three times a month, and this is the shambles you get when politicians with no real knowledge of professional sport (yes, I mean you Boris) are involved in such decision making.

We have been mucked about, we should sue the government and the Olympic legacy people for the waste of our money in the bidding process. A binding process that Boris seems to be prepared to allow any Tom, Dick or Yankee sport to muscle into.

I should want them all to stew in their own juices, the victims of their own stupidity right from the start. But I still believe we can progress in the Olympic stadium, if we ever get the chance to prove it. If the Government are ever prepared to get their hands dirty with football.


Please note that the opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of, nor should be attributed to, KUMB.com.





Your Comments


by Max
05:45PM 13th Nov 2012
''You make a good point about the OS. Although Coe undoubtedly delivered a fantastic Olympics, the stubbornness not to consider football in the design was stupid on his part. The stadium is the wrong shape, the atmosphere will be awful, and will cost millions to convert it. They should have followed the model of the 2002 Manchester Commonwealth games, where the stadium was designed with football in mind, and easily converted into a football stadium after the games had finished.

I also feel that a capacity of 50,000-ish would be a more realistic and achievable capacity, like at the Etihad.''

by Henry
03:24PM 13th Nov 2012
''Fantastic post old chap. Spot on with the Olympic Stadium rubbish and always realistic about our beloved club's future. I also hope that some West Ham fans are eating humble pie after complaining about BS' tactics. I much prefer competing with the big boys rather than getting torn apart every week. However it comes a victory is a great one and it justifies our fantastic and huge support worldwide.''

comments powered by Disqus
 
Articles Image