Wolves 0 West Ham Utd 2 (15/08/09)
Moderator: Gnome
- ManInTheIronsMask.
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:10 pm
- Location: Queing up at Nathan's.
- Has liked: 4 likes
- Total likes: 4 likes
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread
Why do Chelsea always,always do that right at the end I suppose the 27 minutes stoppage time helped on this occasion.
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:42 am
- Location: los angeles
Re: Player Ratings
i agree with most of original post, apart from;
jimenez 6, showed a few good runs and passes, but really didn't contribute enough for me and seemed to go missing a little.
parker, 6, not his best game, his longer range passing needs to improve, warmed up a bit more in second half, just lacked a bit today, still it is early doors.
collins, 6, very solid in the air, did get turned a few times, but unfortunately is one of his faults as a player, tends to get to tight to forwards, allowing them to roll him.
jimenez 6, showed a few good runs and passes, but really didn't contribute enough for me and seemed to go missing a little.
parker, 6, not his best game, his longer range passing needs to improve, warmed up a bit more in second half, just lacked a bit today, still it is early doors.
collins, 6, very solid in the air, did get turned a few times, but unfortunately is one of his faults as a player, tends to get to tight to forwards, allowing them to roll him.
- Big_Russ
- Posts: 4794
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:50 am
- Location: In the "Fit for Life" thread cuddling WG.
Re: Player Ratings
Thanks for the feedback guys, all about opinions eh!
I really would like to see Gabbs in for Collins next game though. I would prefer Tomkins as well TBH
I really would like to see Gabbs in for Collins next game though. I would prefer Tomkins as well TBH
-
- Posts: 9296
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:44 pm
Re: Player Ratings
Bit of a risk putting Gabbidon in just now. Personally, I'd wait until a game with not much on it where it doesn't matter too much if we lose and give him 90 minutes in that. Carling Cup tie is actually a perfect opportunity to do that.Big_Russ wrote:Thanks for the feedback guys, all about opinions eh!
I really would like to see Gabbs in for Collins next game though. I would prefer Tomkins as well TBH
- Paddy O'Hammer
- Posts: 11138
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:57 am
- Location: Dublin, Ireland
- Has liked: 511 likes
- Total likes: 166 likes
- Contact:
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread
I have now corrected the Premier league table :raver:
It is as it should be, your majesty.....
It is as it should be, your majesty.....
-
- Posts: 9296
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:44 pm
Re: Player Ratings
Or 71.21%Big_Russ wrote:So far rarings put forward 81, 76 and 78.
Average of 78.33 recurring.
- Up the Junction
- Thinks he owns the place
- Posts: 71105
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 12:03 am
- Has liked: 762 likes
- Total likes: 3496 likes
Re: Player Ratings
All in the same place please Russ ... we archive the match threads so it's good to finish them with ratingsBig_Russ wrote:I thought I would start this thread so that people who have seen the game either on TV or live can put down the ratings for the players.
- Jameslegend
- Posts: 1466
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 12:41 pm
- Location: Chelmsford, Essex
- Has liked: 118 likes
- Total likes: 4 likes
-
- Posts: 9296
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:44 pm
Re: Player Ratings
Yeah, but that's out of eleven. So divide by eleven and multiply by ten for a percentage figure.Big_Russ wrote: Really?
76+78+81=235
235/3=78.3333333333333??
- Paddy O'Hammer
- Posts: 11138
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:57 am
- Location: Dublin, Ireland
- Has liked: 511 likes
- Total likes: 166 likes
- Contact:
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread
Fuppin hell!Jameslegend wrote:Ooops 3-0 to Arsenal, joint second!
Lawro sez
"Arsenal have talent in abundance with the likes of Tomas Rosicky, Cesc Fabregas and Eduardo, but they are lacking players with real power, which is a concern.
Arsene Wenger probably needs a little more time to work out how his team are going to play this season, so I think they will make a losing start at Goodison Park on Saturday"
Everton to win 2:1
.......................why is that **** listened too. Still he always brings a smile to me cheeks and venon to me spit.
Player Ratings
this is a great idea, maybe the main kumb site could put a star rating system (eg. Ajax or a simple Javascript one) for each player on the match reports section, or something? It's easy enough to do on blogs. So that all the kumb readers could have a bit of input.Big Russ wrote:
Also probably a way of keeping a running total too, or you could just add em all up at the end of the season?
Anyway, here's mine:
Green - 8, flapped once but had a few superb stops and as usual kept us in the game. MOTM for me.
Faubert - 7, had a great attacking game and put in a couple of solid tackles too, on that sort of form the position could be his.
Upson - 7.5, solid defence and well-taken goal from the big man. Will be greatly missed if he ends up at city.
Collins - 6, seemed a bit off the pace of the match in places.
Illunga - 7, defended solidly and got in good attacking positions a few times.
Noble - 7.5, great goal and some good forward balls from the lad, was involved in the play a lot. Could have been MOTM.
Parker - 7, broke up the play well and got involved in the attack every so often too.
Collison - 6.5, was a bit quiet I thought.
Dyer - 7, a lot of movement and a couple of good chances. Looked the most likely to score for a lot of the game.
Jimenez - 7, good movement from jimi too, seems to be settling in quite nicely.
Cole - 7.5, great hold up play as usual from the big man, magnificent passing and movement. Seemed a bit goal-shy though.
Spector - 5, gave it away far too regularly, found myself tense every time he was near the ball
Stanislas - 7, did some good running and added a bit of an pacy attacking spark to the proceedings.
Last edited by King Guy on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:42 pm, edited 5 times in total.
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread
Not sure how to post links but the goals are on 101greatgoals.com
- Big_Russ
- Posts: 4794
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:50 am
- Location: In the "Fit for Life" thread cuddling WG.
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread
:lol:Yeah, but that's out of eleven. So divide by eleven and multiply by ten for a percentage figure.
In a word... no
Mate where did you learn maths?
- Memorial Ground
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:28 pm
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread
Can't seem to get on their site but I'll keep an eye out, cheersmaltab wrote:Not sure how to post links but the goals are on 101greatgoals.com
edit: working now but slowly
Last edited by Memorial Ground on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Big_Russ
- Posts: 4794
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:50 am
- Location: In the "Fit for Life" thread cuddling WG.
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread
his is a great idea, maybe the main kumb site could put a star rating system (eg. Ajax ) for each player on the match reports section, or something? It's easy enough to do on blogs.
Sorry mate... its been canned already.
Blame that despot UTJ !! :lol:
-
- Posts: 9296
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:44 pm
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread
It's pretty simple, isn't it? Your totals are from eleven scores (for eleven players), so they're not giving a percentage. To get the percentage, you divide by the original sample and multiply by ten, no?Big_Russ wrote: In a word... no
Mate where did you learn maths?
It has been a long time since I did maths tbf...
- OsloHammer
- Posts: 6372
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:34 am
- Location: Sunny Norway
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread
From my egg chasing days I seem to remember concussion was automatic 3 weeks (could be wrong though, I was usually concussed at the time).Up the Junction wrote: Concussion by the looks of it, should be out for a week tops if so.