Chelsea 3 West Ham Utd 0 (23/04/11)

Relive every moment of every first team game since the beginning of the 2005/06 season. Our archive of matchday threads originally posted in the General Discussion Forum.

Moderator: Gnome

Post Reply
User avatar
bubbles1966
Posts: 67292
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: I'm holding onto nothing, and trying to forget the rest
Has liked: 2497 likes
Total likes: 4396 likes

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by bubbles1966 »

Up the Junction wrote: Doesn't look much like a 3-0 until that final stat.
Moments UtJ, moments.

Could easily have gone our way if individuals had been more whole hearted or accomplished.

A good performance, whatever the scoreline. Same as at Spurs...and Arsenal.

Our boys have had a reasonable pop at them all this season.

Absolutely nohing to be ashamed of.

:crest:
Last edited by bubbles1966 on Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
GJH
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:37 pm

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by GJH »

Het-Field wrote:Upson was "sick" :lol:
Yes, I thought he was good too!
User avatar
hawkins_hammer
Posts: 13419
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:21 pm
Location: missing Zola and Behrami
Has liked: 25 likes
Total likes: 134 likes

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by hawkins_hammer »

Cuenca 'ammer wrote:Hawkins

Playing Ba up top with Cole would mean us playing a 4-4-2 ??

Wonder why Gold nevers mentions being born at 4-4-2 Green Street any more ??

:think:
I know I know.

Miles, it remains Spector > O'Neill.
fmgod
Posts: 19333
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:54 pm
Has liked: 50 likes
Total likes: 134 likes

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by fmgod »

Same every week though, if we had done this or that we would of one, if we had defended better we would of won, football is a game of if and buts and at the moment we are not getting results, Grant is failing, we need to change it, we need to turn them if and buts into goals and clean sheets.
User avatar
smuts
Posts: 33937
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:28 am
Location: East, East, East London
Has liked: 1536 likes
Total likes: 1496 likes

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by smuts »

Upton Larks wrote: Why? T*ttenham fan on a West Ham forum offers partonising comment minutes after a derby defeat ... nope, stand by the comment.
It wasn't patronising at all.....pretty much spot on.

Sadly despite how well we done, we now look doomed.
Last edited by smuts on Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
bubbles1966
Posts: 67292
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: I'm holding onto nothing, and trying to forget the rest
Has liked: 2497 likes
Total likes: 4396 likes

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by bubbles1966 »

Spector isn't better than O'Neil. They're =

Spector is an intelligent, useful player if used properly.

If both play regularly in the Npower next year I'd expect automaric promotion.
User avatar
neilbob
Posts: 6644
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:13 pm
Location: Barking Rd

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by neilbob »

thought we played quite well, but they were the better side (or rather individuals). No disgrace in losing today, and the scoreline was a bit heavier than was fair (on the run of play).

what we need to do is win our last 3 winnable games - because sure as **** Wigan, Blackburn and Sunderland are not as good as Chelsea...
User avatar
Up the Junction
Thinks he owns the place
Posts: 71101
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 12:03 am
Has liked: 762 likes
Total likes: 3498 likes

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by Up the Junction »

bubbles1966 wrote:Absolutely nothing to be ashamed of. :crest:
Couldn't agree more.
User avatar
bubbles1966
Posts: 67292
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: I'm holding onto nothing, and trying to forget the rest
Has liked: 2497 likes
Total likes: 4396 likes

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by bubbles1966 »

fmgod wrote:Same every week though, if we had done this or that we would of one, if we had defended better we would of won, football is a game of if and buts and at the moment we are not getting results, Grant is failing, we need to change it, we need to turn them if and buts into goals and clean sheets.
Sod all to do with Grant today.

Chelsea are one of the best 8 teams in Europe - we matched them today but for key moments.

For 100k a week a player you'd expect better workmanship than for 40k a week, surely?
User avatar
Cuenca 'ammer
ex 'ouston 'ammer
Posts: 40912
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 4:19 pm
Location: Journey to the dead of night. High on a hill in Eldorado
Has liked: 1986 likes
Total likes: 1661 likes

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by Cuenca 'ammer »

But we never seem to show up for those games. Great to look good against Chel$ki and ManYoo, (games we "expect" to lose) but why oh fkcuing why can't we get a performance away at Bolton, or home to Villa ????????????
User avatar
hawkins_hammer
Posts: 13419
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:21 pm
Location: missing Zola and Behrami
Has liked: 25 likes
Total likes: 134 likes

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by hawkins_hammer »

Cuenca 'ammer wrote:But we never seem to show up for those games. Great to look good against Chel$ki and ManYoo, (games we "expect" to lose) but why oh fkcuing why can't we get a performance away at Bolton, or home to Villa ????????????
Exactly
User avatar
miles
This site...
Posts: 4509
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 4:56 am
Has liked: 322 likes
Total likes: 421 likes

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by miles »

hawkins_hammer wrote: I know I know.

Miles, it remains Spector > O'Neill.
Oh I agree. He's actually the best all round central midfield player we have at the club. Seriously. :lol:
User avatar
Westbourne Bill
Posts: 7483
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 5:49 pm
Location: W Sussex
Has liked: 130 likes
Total likes: 332 likes

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by Westbourne Bill »

A performance that suggests they could win at Wigan.
User avatar
bubbles1966
Posts: 67292
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: I'm holding onto nothing, and trying to forget the rest
Has liked: 2497 likes
Total likes: 4396 likes

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by bubbles1966 »

We've beaten Liverpool, Spurs and Man U this year - who we "always" lose to.

We're unbeaten this year against Everton - who we "always" lose to.

Our problem stems from **** players back in the autumn...like Kovac, Ilunga etc.....

IF we stay up, the promised land is around the corner.

Half hearted, perma crock and useless players are on their way out.

17th will do.

Today hasn't been a bad day.
.
User avatar
DannyboyDJL
Posts: 5564
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:59 pm
Has liked: 40 likes
Total likes: 207 likes

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by DannyboyDJL »

I said it after the villa game about him changing the strikers every game. Also, what's his problem with Tomkins? He was our best defender all season, then dropped. Also, Sears was excellent today, and always is for me, but why suddenly brought back in today? He seems to change his team every game. I'll be surprised if he plays that front 3 next game.
User avatar
beckton
Posts: 13568
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:41 pm
Location: Hanging on by my fingertips.

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by beckton »

bubbles1966 wrote:
Today hasn't been a bad day.
.

A one nil would have been better but I was surprised how we matched them in the second half and thought we could nick a point.
User avatar
bubbles1966
Posts: 67292
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: I'm holding onto nothing, and trying to forget the rest
Has liked: 2497 likes
Total likes: 4396 likes

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by bubbles1966 »

Becks,

There's a team there waiting to break out.

If we play that way over the last 4, we'll be ok.

Until Torres got his stuck in the mud goal it was even-steven. Again (wish I wasn't saying it) Dacosta slow to react.

Danny Boy


I can't explain his preference for Dacosta over Tomkins. Tomkins can be more obviously horrendous - but at this best is a far superior player. Think we'll try something similar against Citeh next week.
User avatar
w4hammer
Posts: 8057
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:22 pm
Location: ..my heart says... West Ham.. my head says ...West Ham
Has liked: 1 like
Total likes: 3 likes

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by w4hammer »

i know we've all be known to clutch at straws, but that was a great show today...i still, till my dying death dont know how keane missed that chance, and at 1-1 it would have been a different game.

we competed all over the park, and i cant fault anyone


watching games every week gives you a sense- and when carlton was just a little short, lost the ball- they go three on one and its a goal.


fantastic day out, showed those c**** how it is...we will prolly go down..but we are west ham, and always will be :crest:
fmgod
Posts: 19333
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:54 pm
Has liked: 50 likes
Total likes: 134 likes

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by fmgod »

Dannyboylister wrote:I said it after the villa game about him changing the strikers every game. Also, what's his problem with Tomkins? He was our best defender all season, then dropped. Also, Sears was excellent today, and always is for me, but why suddenly brought back in today? He seems to change his team every game. I'll be surprised if he plays that front 3 next game.
Tomkins isn't ready to be playing week in week out, first thing on the shopping list should be capable CB's.
Last edited by fmgod on Sat Apr 23, 2011 9:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
chigwells finest
Posts: 10885
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 12:11 pm
Location: crying with family/crying with strangers & just crying tbh
Has liked: 391 likes
Total likes: 159 likes
Contact:

Re: Chelsea FC v West Ham United FC Match Thread

Post by chigwells finest »

cant wait for mondays email from avi..
Post Reply