Yeah, but his signing would have affected the decision to not sign the other 3, wouldn't it?lukeWHU wrote:Did Stoke ever make an actual bid? Even if they did, its extremely unlikely Cole would be playing ahead of Crouch, Jones or Jerome.
Leicester City 1 West Ham United 2 (23/04/12)
Moderator: Gnome
- rare as rockinghorse shat
- Posts: 55216
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 2:43 am
- Location: **** the board
- Has liked: 3 likes
- Total likes: 78 likes
Re: Leicester City V West Ham United: Match Thread
- Yea Why Not
- Posts: 16954
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:49 pm
- Location: Chips & Gravy you say? Well you can shove that up your ass
Re: Leicester City V West Ham United: Match Thread
Yep, so did Liverpool and Fulham if you believe what you read. At one point Cole would have been seen by most as a better player than those you have mentionedlukeWHU wrote: Did Stoke ever make an actual bid? Even if they did, its extremely unlikely Cole would be playing ahead of Crouch, Jones or Jerome.
Last edited by Yea Why Not on Wed Apr 25, 2012 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Leicester City V West Ham United: Match Thread
We accepted the bid for Cole from Stoke, he didn't want to go there. A bad role model for Newham.
Re: Leicester City V West Ham United: Match Thread
They must be praising the gods they never signed him
- Cuenca 'ammer
- ex 'ouston 'ammer
- Posts: 40899
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 4:19 pm
- Location: Journey to the dead of night. High on a hill in Eldorado
- Has liked: 1976 likes
- Total likes: 1657 likes
Re: Leicester City V West Ham United: Match Thread
But those self acclaimed "journalists" said the other week that boos rang out loudly didn't they ? And Utj was on here asking if anyone heard it because he was at the game and never did.
If you look at CH round up some of the reports are virtually identical. Makes you wonder who made up the story first ..
:lol:
If you look at CH round up some of the reports are virtually identical. Makes you wonder who made up the story first ..
:lol: