West Ham Utd 0 Charlton Ath 0 (02/04/06)

An archive of match day threads originally posted in the General Discussion forum.

Moderator: Gnome

Postby berlinhammer on Sun Apr 02, 2006 9:54 pm

fair result really

charlton's defence was rock solid, perry and particularly kishishev were outstanding
User avatar
berlinhammer
 
Posts: 509
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 3:01 pm

Postby dodger on Sun Apr 02, 2006 10:12 pm

Was a pretty dire game really. They were solid but never threatened us. We were slightly the better side throughout but really lacked a cutting edge.
Ratings:
Hislop-5 Nothing to do but slow off his line and lack of communication with defenders on a worrying number of occasions
Konchesky-6 Not bad but still very error-prone
Gabbidon-8 Very solid with lots of crucial interceptions, though with one or two mistakes
Collins-9 MOTM Won every header, a rock in defense
Ferdinand-6 Not bad but RB is not his position
Etherington-7 Dangerous and inventive, but no killer crosses/passes
Reo-Coker-5 Not in the game
Mullins-5 Failed to control the midfield, constantly outmuscled and outplayed by Holland
Benayoun-6 Got into it in the second half but wasted a couple of very good chances
Harewood-7 Never really got going but worked hard and always a threat
Ashton-5 Not in it at all, rightly subbed.

SUBS
Sheringham-7 Played well, added what we'd been lacking in the first half
Zamora-6 Didn't look too bad, unlucky not to score
Katan-5 Not enough time

Dissapointed as it ends any lingering dreams we had of europe via the league but am by no means disheartened by this result. Charlton were resolute, and we just weren't quite at our best.
User avatar
dodger
 
Posts: 9210
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 12:16 pm
Location: Scotland / London / Japan / somewhere in between the 3

Postby EastEndIRON on Sun Apr 02, 2006 10:36 pm

Mullins-5 Failed to control the midfield, constantly outmuscled and outplayed by Holland


Think you are unfair in your assesment of Mullins here mate no_no
Thought he had quite a good game myself, spread the play nicely on several of occassions

Didnt he get man of the match ? (serious question, I was upstairs for all the post match stuff and thought i heard his name for 'Man of the match' - but i could be imagining things)
User avatar
EastEndIRON
 
Posts: 2947
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 7:10 pm

Postby If only.... on Sun Apr 02, 2006 10:56 pm

If Yossi had worn his shooting boots we would have won. He put at least two wide and gifted two soft ones straight at the keeper.

Had we scored it would have kicked off. We would have gone for a second and Charlton would have had to push up leaving more space.

As it was the lack of goals killed it as a spectacle.

I really felt we controlled it and did not look under pressure at the back.

Dropping 5 of last 6 home points looks expensive to me. Shame, I'd hate to see the League performance drift away and we have some tough games coming up.
User avatar
If only....
 
Posts: 2081
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 8:14 pm
Location: Wondering why WHU is not on the thrillseekers list of the most extreme rollercoasters

Postby clarkerm_ on Sun Apr 02, 2006 10:56 pm

Went to the game today - Was pretty poor to be honest, but on chances created, we deserved to nick it. There were some glimpses of our good play, but overall we were held be a defensive Charlton - If we had been anywhere near our best, we would have stuffed them.

Was a bit disappointed with the crowd today, was very quiet!
User avatar
clarkerm_
 
Posts: 833
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Guildford

Postby rare as rockinghorse shat on Sun Apr 02, 2006 11:00 pm

Larry wrote:missed the reason for the substitution - was Ashton coming off just tactical or did he have an injury.


He was just ****.
(For whatever reason)
User avatar
rare as rockinghorse shat
 
Posts: 44579
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:43 am
Location: Deplete. Punish. Destroy.

Postby Paolo Futre on Sun Apr 02, 2006 11:49 pm

rare as rockinghorse shat wrote:
Larry wrote:missed the reason for the substitution - was Ashton coming off just tactical or did he have an injury.


He was just sh*t.
(For whatever reason)


Really? I thought Deano showed some good touches and linked up the midfield and attack well...
User avatar
Paolo Futre
Warsaw's Peter Stringfellow
 
Posts: 3003
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 3:26 pm
Location: Istanbul

Postby paddy on Sun Apr 02, 2006 11:50 pm

I can't see how Ashton was 'jaded' - how many games did he play for Norwich this season? He's not exactly had the workload of Marlon.
Thought there was promise in the Collins/Anton blend - some nice overlaps from Anton first half, and seemed to get further forward there.
In terms of effort and mileage, I had Yossi as MOTM, although in results, Collins..
paddy
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Constantly somewhere probably

Postby yabush on Sun Apr 02, 2006 11:56 pm

Why the team keep using the long passing tactics recently
We are not Bolton :x

Deano didn't have much cooperation with Marlon
that's frustrating
User avatar
yabush
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:55 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby dodger on Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:12 am

EastEndIRON wrote:
Mullins-5 Failed to control the midfield, constantly outmuscled and outplayed by Holland


Think you are unfair in your assesment of Mullins here mate no_no
Thought he had quite a good game myself, spread the play nicely on several of occassions

Didnt he get man of the match ? (serious question, I was upstairs for all the post match stuff and thought i heard his name for 'Man of the match' - but i could be imagining things)

Am aware I'm in the minority in this opinion but really thought Holland bullied him out of the game today. Mullins and Reo-Coker really did lose the midfield battle IMO.
User avatar
dodger
 
Posts: 9210
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 12:16 pm
Location: Scotland / London / Japan / somewhere in between the 3

Postby Southend Hammer on Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am

stockwell pete wrote:
Southend Hammer wrote:We deserved to win that. Two goal line clearances and the majority of the goal attempts. Seemed like NRC had a quiet game.


:shock: I agree. vomit
:!: :D :D :D
User avatar
Southend Hammer
 
Posts: 3011
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 6:17 am

Postby Southend Hammer on Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:31 am

Paolo Futre wrote:
rare as rockinghorse shat wrote:
Larry wrote:missed the reason for the substitution - was Ashton coming off just tactical or did he have an injury.


He was just sh*t.
(For whatever reason)


Really? I thought Deano showed some good touches and linked up the midfield and attack well...
Agree, I thought he showed some good touches also but wasn't putting himself about the way that Marlon was.
User avatar
Southend Hammer
 
Posts: 3011
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 6:17 am

Postby EvilC on Mon Apr 03, 2006 8:36 am

dodger wrote:Hislop-5 Nothing to do but slow off his line and lack of communication with defenders on a worrying number of occasions


Spot on - and not for the first time this season. Every game he does exactly this - and it reminds me of why we got rid of him in the first place.
User avatar
EvilC
 
Posts: 7251
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 5:54 pm
Location: In the street as the cold wind blows, in the ghetto...

Postby Romfordboy on Mon Apr 03, 2006 8:40 am

Can see why pards is going for another keeper.
Romfordboy
 
Posts: 493
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 12:07 pm

Postby The Badger on Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:08 am

From what I saw we lacked a cutting edge and there was no subtlety to our play, moves were telegraphed and there was no running off the ball. It was pretty putrid stuff to be honest - One of those games that had 0-0 written all over it after about 5 minutes.
User avatar
The Badger
 
Posts: 2810
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Sitting at the right hand of wad

Postby Andy on Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:15 am

dunno if anyones said anything about this already, but Charlton fans - did you listen to the difference between how we treated our ex player and how you did.
Losers.
User avatar
Andy
 
Posts: 2552
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2003 12:04 pm
Location: the same seat in the New Era stand

Postby Arch Dandy on Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:20 am

Andy wrote:dunno if anyones said anything about this already, but Charlton fans - did you listen to the difference between how we treated our ex player and how you did.
Losers.


There was a difference in circumstances as to why those players left though... we do treat more than one of our ex players a lot worse than they treated Konch.
User avatar
Arch Dandy
 
Posts: 8224
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Bringing you the boos since 1980

Postby Andy on Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:48 am

Arch Dandy wrote:
Andy wrote:dunno if anyones said anything about this already, but Charlton fans - did you listen to the difference between how we treated our ex player and how you did.
Losers.


There was a difference in circumstances as to why those players left though... we do treat more than one of our ex players a lot worse than they treated Konch.


I thought Konch left because he wasnt being played in the right position for him and consequently wasnt doing too well at LM?
I didnt think that he was in the same class a Judas for them as certain ex players are for us?
User avatar
Andy
 
Posts: 2552
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2003 12:04 pm
Location: the same seat in the New Era stand

Postby Arch Dandy on Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:54 am

Andy wrote:I thought Konch left because he wasnt being played in the right position for him and consequently wasnt doing too well at LM?
I didnt think that he was in the same class a Judas for them as certain ex players are for us?


I think that was one of the reasons behind his public falling out with Curbishly and the fact that he's had nothing good to say about them since, point I was trying to make was that Konch didn't leave Charlton on good terms whereas Powell left us a happy bunny.

I doubt he's in the same class as Ince but Charlton don't really have a lot to make a noise about do they :D
User avatar
Arch Dandy
 
Posts: 8224
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Bringing you the boos since 1980

Postby polar on Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:50 pm

Mullins was MOTM for me.

There was a number of time he provided excellent defence cover and made life easy for Gabbs and Collins. He also made good use of the ball.
User avatar
polar
 
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: In the neighbourhood

PreviousNext

Return to KUMB Match Threads

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests