This is bollox RARS, Etherington created plenty of goals for us last year.rare as rockinghorse shat wrote:Etherington was dreadful when he came on today...but that aside, he is so important to us.
I know the argument goes on about how important he is and that people think he created loads of goals last year when in fact he never.... .
West Ham United 1 Aston Villa 1 (10/09/06)
Moderator: Gnome
- carnage
- Posts: 22530
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2003 2:22 pm
- Location: KFC
- Has liked: 84 likes
- Total likes: 709 likes
- rare as rockinghorse shat
- Posts: 55216
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 2:43 am
- Location: **** the board
- Has liked: 3 likes
- Total likes: 78 likes
- JimmyHammer
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 10:23 am
- rare as rockinghorse shat
- Posts: 55216
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 2:43 am
- Location: **** the board
- Has liked: 3 likes
- Total likes: 78 likes
I didn't see the game becaause my ****ing electricity was cut off yesterday afternoon (before anyone calls me an armchair supporter, or a lazy hippiy who should pay his bills, i live in China aka the New Wild West, and the bastards cut me off before giving me any ****ing bills).
Sounds like we played crap, but hey, people need to temper expectations a little. We always draw with villa. was yesterday worse than the 4-0 defeat at home by sheffield wednesdayy a few years ago, for instance?
Sounds like we played crap, but hey, people need to temper expectations a little. We always draw with villa. was yesterday worse than the 4-0 defeat at home by sheffield wednesdayy a few years ago, for instance?
Yeah, can everyone lay off the "drop him!" solution to our performance yesterday? Rather than can the man, why not offer some insight to WHY some of our players should be dropped other than they were SH*TE. We don't have any players of this sort on our books, so HAVE SOME RESPECT!! What we do have are players lacking in some areas of their play and that's the comments i'd like to read, thank you very much.
The game i watched on the net: Well, after the first 10 minutes I was gobsmacked ... we were already behind, but not by a soft goal - it was by one of those lucky goal mouth ones, but then Marlon misses an absolute sitter. He nearly fell as he tried his shot. He has much more balance than that so what happened? Not comfortable on the ball. Some have said he doesn't have the talent but ANYONE who has played 350 career games COULD have EASILY scored. I think the whole team wasn't comfortable (with the exception of Gabbers, and also Anton who knows nothing else) --- and we also kept giving these hospital passes to team mates, especially in midfield, that everytime meant the villans had the ball back within two seconds. The Konch does this too often, and Benayoun too. It smacked of a lack of urgency and not of a team already one goal down.
We weren't comfortable on the ball at all, whereas Villa were. Maybe I'm singling Marlon out but Villa in comparison were composed, composed, composed. Why? I think the biggest reason is the acres of space each Villa player gave his team mate. I remember being impressed with their passing because each time they had an eternity on the ball because the pass they received was very good. In contrast, West Ham's hospital passing meant that our attacks 'spluttered' -- in rugby union, a team with good control will put many many phases together. Normally West Ham ARE quick on the ball, ie able to move the ball around quickly with crisp passing -- we have a reputation for this -- but Villa showed us exactly how to do it in the first half. We can't afford to take 60 minutes to start playing good 'phase' football.
Then the reason I love this club comes into play. By the last 15 minutes it is the Irons who look more likely to score because we finally wake up to the fact we have to really really think hard about trying to get the ball into the oppositions net. Everything picked up -- we weren't giving the ball away so often, our attacks had purpose, and so Villa's goal was under constant threat.
But it was Tevez who showed up some of the problems we have. His best move of the match had him deliver his final ball into acres of space 3 yards out from goal, but Bobby was heading towards the near post (albiet with a defender hanging off him) where, even if Tevez had managed to get it to him, he would have had a hell of a time scoring. The commentator made the point that a hungrier team would have scored, but I disagree, the players have to put each other into SPACE, they have to THINK like this and also have to LOOK up every once in a while (hello Marlon).
We've only had 30 mins of Argentinian influence to see so far but I think Tevez has given us an indication that he knows this in his bones. Let's hope so. One of my favourite jokes of all time is:
Q: What do you do when you see a spaceman?
A: You park your car, man.
(hilarious, isn't it?)
In my dreams, all the players have adopted the mantra:
Q: What do you do when you see a spaceman?
A: You put an inch-perfect pass for your team mate into it, man.
The game i watched on the net: Well, after the first 10 minutes I was gobsmacked ... we were already behind, but not by a soft goal - it was by one of those lucky goal mouth ones, but then Marlon misses an absolute sitter. He nearly fell as he tried his shot. He has much more balance than that so what happened? Not comfortable on the ball. Some have said he doesn't have the talent but ANYONE who has played 350 career games COULD have EASILY scored. I think the whole team wasn't comfortable (with the exception of Gabbers, and also Anton who knows nothing else) --- and we also kept giving these hospital passes to team mates, especially in midfield, that everytime meant the villans had the ball back within two seconds. The Konch does this too often, and Benayoun too. It smacked of a lack of urgency and not of a team already one goal down.
We weren't comfortable on the ball at all, whereas Villa were. Maybe I'm singling Marlon out but Villa in comparison were composed, composed, composed. Why? I think the biggest reason is the acres of space each Villa player gave his team mate. I remember being impressed with their passing because each time they had an eternity on the ball because the pass they received was very good. In contrast, West Ham's hospital passing meant that our attacks 'spluttered' -- in rugby union, a team with good control will put many many phases together. Normally West Ham ARE quick on the ball, ie able to move the ball around quickly with crisp passing -- we have a reputation for this -- but Villa showed us exactly how to do it in the first half. We can't afford to take 60 minutes to start playing good 'phase' football.
Then the reason I love this club comes into play. By the last 15 minutes it is the Irons who look more likely to score because we finally wake up to the fact we have to really really think hard about trying to get the ball into the oppositions net. Everything picked up -- we weren't giving the ball away so often, our attacks had purpose, and so Villa's goal was under constant threat.
But it was Tevez who showed up some of the problems we have. His best move of the match had him deliver his final ball into acres of space 3 yards out from goal, but Bobby was heading towards the near post (albiet with a defender hanging off him) where, even if Tevez had managed to get it to him, he would have had a hell of a time scoring. The commentator made the point that a hungrier team would have scored, but I disagree, the players have to put each other into SPACE, they have to THINK like this and also have to LOOK up every once in a while (hello Marlon).
We've only had 30 mins of Argentinian influence to see so far but I think Tevez has given us an indication that he knows this in his bones. Let's hope so. One of my favourite jokes of all time is:
Q: What do you do when you see a spaceman?
A: You park your car, man.
(hilarious, isn't it?)
In my dreams, all the players have adopted the mantra:
Q: What do you do when you see a spaceman?
A: You put an inch-perfect pass for your team mate into it, man.
http://football.guardian.co.uk/Columnis ... 40,00.htmlLarry wrote: don't get me wrong I like Konch, and think he's good at defending and going forward but as I said it's just his passing that worries me..
....In an intriguing contest, brimming with subplots, it was notable that both English left-backs on show turned in excellent performances. In Konchesky and Barry we have two genuine full-backs of quality. Both can tackle and pass and can disguise a tiny lack of pace. Ashley Cole had better stay on his toes...
- Canadianhammer
- Posts: 1712
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:02 pm
- Location: COYI's
I agree...he looks sleazy or something...rare as rockinghorse shat wrote::lol: Definately not mate.... the wife was pretty incredible.
Both a couple of miserable bastards though to be honest.
I really don't like the look of this Kia bloke.
As for the game...I think Villa really took it to us today in the 1st half and we were lucky to come out of it with a point. They played at such a pace that we were completely unsettled by it. We came out and wanted to stroll and play obvious football...Villa were having none of it. We never did fully recover. I think that's why so many of our players had a bad game...they were all thrown off. We've gotta be ready from the first whistle cos we spent the first half trying to keep up. They really took it to us, kept us on our back foot, and made many of our players look terrible. It's no coincidence that so many of them could not pass, Konchesky, Mullins, NRC even...poor finishing. I'll bet Pard's will be setting that right this week.
- Bobby Orangeboom
- Posts: 34465
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 3:10 pm
- Location: London, unfortunately.
100000% agree...Larry wrote: to be honest I've had my doubts about Konchesky for quite a while now and I think Pardew, should seriously consider bringing in another left back in January so as to give us more options in that position..
Konchesky is at best an average left back...
We definately need a better left back if we are to progress as a football club !!
- Countryboy
- Posts: 5827
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 6:35 am
- Location: Staying home on a Saturday afternoon
He already has ... George McCartney. We just haven't seen him yet owing to injury.Bobby Orangeboom wrote: 100000% agree...
Konchesky is at best an average left back...
We definately need a better left back if we are to progress as a football club !!
As to the rest of the game, it was an embarrassment to put on such a shoddy performance in front of our two new players. But ...
We can and will play much much better, particularly once Matty is fully fit.
Villa are a tough team with an excellent manager and they made Arsenal look like mugs at the Emirates, too.
We were always going to have a negative reaction after the insane amounts of hype surrounding the club over the past fortnight.
Last season, we'd follow dismal home games like this - Portsmouth anyone? - with massive improvements in tougher games the following week. So I'd expect improvement against palermo and newcastle.
And it could be worse. We could be Tottenham. Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha!!!
- Bobby Orangeboom
- Posts: 34465
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 3:10 pm
- Location: London, unfortunately.
George Macartney is NOT a better left back than Konchesky..Countryboy wrote: He already has ... George McCartney. We just haven't seen him yet owing to injury.
As to the rest of the game, it was an embarrassment to put on such a shoddy performance in front of our two new players. But ...
We can and will play much much better, particularly once Matty is fully fit.
Villa are a tough team with an excellent manager and they made Arsenal look like mugs at the Emirates, too.
We were always going to have a negative reaction after the insane amounts of hype surrounding the club over the past fortnight.
Last season, we'd follow dismal home games like this - Portsmouth anyone? - with massive improvements in tougher games the following week. So I'd expect improvement against palermo and newcastle.
And it could be worse. We could be Tottenham. Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha!!!
I'd rather have Linda Macartney's Pies playing there !!!
- Alf Garnett's (Ex) Missus
- Posts: 8142
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 5:08 pm
- Location: A bit rural...
- Has liked: 247 likes
- Total likes: 195 likes
My quick twopenneth...
Petrov bossed the whole midfield for them.
Should have been 3-0 down at half time
Marlon off pace - lacking confidence big time and didn't seem up for it
We lacked width - both Yossi and to some extent Bowyer failed to use the width often enough and even when Etherington came on he also cut inside too often
Defence looked very shakey at times and Carroll doesn't convince me he can manage his defenders
Pardew cut his nose off to spite his face IMHO - I pick the team therefore I'll leave a £20m+ midfielder on the bench and play the shower of ***** that is Mullins
Tevez obviously is not a traditional peanlty area striker and we are going to need to see more players in the box when he drifts out - something we are generally not good at
And wtf was the cake **** all about after the game Pardew? :shock:
Petrov bossed the whole midfield for them.
Should have been 3-0 down at half time
Marlon off pace - lacking confidence big time and didn't seem up for it
We lacked width - both Yossi and to some extent Bowyer failed to use the width often enough and even when Etherington came on he also cut inside too often
Defence looked very shakey at times and Carroll doesn't convince me he can manage his defenders
Pardew cut his nose off to spite his face IMHO - I pick the team therefore I'll leave a £20m+ midfielder on the bench and play the shower of ***** that is Mullins
Tevez obviously is not a traditional peanlty area striker and we are going to need to see more players in the box when he drifts out - something we are generally not good at
And wtf was the cake **** all about after the game Pardew? :shock:
- reo_coker20
- One line wonder
- Posts: 4035
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 9:12 pm
- Location: HOTY
- Has liked: 1 like
- Total likes: 1 like
yes it is but tevez and cole was desperate to come on and im saying he should of been changed with harewood for these two as a joint sub not when pards done itLarry wrote: correct me if I'm wrong here but is'nt it a strikers number one priority to score goals and how good or bad he plays in a match dose not matter..
- reo_coker20
- One line wonder
- Posts: 4035
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 9:12 pm
- Location: HOTY
- Has liked: 1 like
- Total likes: 1 like
konchesky doesn't take hes time he just wants to put the ball in the box with out picking a player out he needs to take hes time in this situationLarry wrote: to be honest I've had my doubts about Konchesky for quite a while now and I think Pardew, should seriously consider bringing in another left back in January so as to give us more options in that position..
- reo_coker20
- One line wonder
- Posts: 4035
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 9:12 pm
- Location: HOTY
- Has liked: 1 like
- Total likes: 1 like
- w4hammer
- Posts: 8057
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:22 pm
- Location: ..my heart says... West Ham.. my head says ...West Ham
- Has liked: 1 like
- Total likes: 3 likes
Alf Garnett's (Ex) Missus wrote:My quick twopenneth...
Petrov bossed the whole midfield for them.
....ERRR- YES, MOTM by a mile- he was everywhere
Should have been 3-0 down at half time
...At least - it was like Pompey last year lol
Marlon off pace - lacking confidence big time and didn't seem up for it
just seemed very lacking in confidenecewhich is understandable, he got fuk all service tho
We lacked width - both Yossi and to some extent Bowyer failed to use the width often enough and even when Etherington came on he also cut inside too often
I can only think it was the game plan-we were constantly coming in-field to take on three or four villa players---i.e. no plan B
Defence looked very shakey at times and Carroll doesn't convince me he can manage his defenders
If thats the way they are going to mplay this season-we're doomed--I think carroll was concsious of his injury and that fear spread elsewhere
Pardew cut his nose off to spite his face IMHO - I pick the team therefore I'll leave a £20m+ midfielder on the bench and play the shower of ***** that is Mullins
Tevez obviously is not a traditional peanlty area striker and we are going to need to see more players in the box when he drifts out - something we are generally not good at
And wtf was the cake sh*t all about after the game Pardew? :shock:
all in all, it was pretty much what i thought would happen.....we looked very distracted and disjointed....a nice little wake-up call which we have got away withy--i think we'll be alot better on thursday and sunday.
the worst performance today by far was from our crowd....fuk me....a few rentacrowd bubbles at the start of each half, does not a good atmosphere make....lets stop moaning and get behind them hey?
- upton o'good
- Posts: 11897
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 9:50 am
- Location: On the sofa, teaching Joanna to sing bubbles
- Has liked: 7 likes
- Total likes: 121 likes