West Ham Utd 1 Wigan 1 (25/08/07)

happyhammer7 · Post by **happyhammer7** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:05 pm

Bit early for this I know, but I am so excited about this game. Anyway, Wigan next week. Let's make sure that not only we get 3 points, but also f*** up their goal difference. This is a big game to the club and the supporters. So, let's discuss possible team selection and chants to welcome them back to Upton Park. This time, we are gonna send those c**** home empty handed

The Gibbins · Post by **The Gibbins** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:07 pm

its usually better when there are fans to actually aim the chants at..

dodger · Post by **dodger** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:08 pm

THE GIBBINS wrote:its usually better when there are fans to actually aim the chants at..

We can aim them all at Mr Whelan instead me thinks.

M_C_Hammer · Post by **M_C_Hammer** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:09 pm

dodger wrote: We can aim them all at Mr Whe*an instead me thinks.

Do you think he will turn up

happyhammer7 · Post by **happyhammer7** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:10 pm

M_C_Hammer wrote: Do you think he will turn up

course he will, he would'nt miss it for the world

dodger · Post by **dodger** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:10 pm

M_C_Hammer wrote: Do you think he will turn up

If he doesn't we should make a dummy Whelan instead and sit him next to Magnusson who can symbolically laugh in the dummies face after every goal we score. Would take a lot of fluff to stuff the dummy to a realistic size though...

cockney hammer · Post by **cockney hammer** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:12 pm

[quote="THE GIBBINS"]its usually better when there are fans to actually aim the chants at..[/quo

wigan's supporters new away vechicle

The Gibbins · Post by **The Gibbins** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:14 pm

cockney hammer wrote:
wigan's supporters new away vechicle

you think they fill it?

jacko · Post by **jacko** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:15 pm

He'll keep the same team, won't he? Maybe bring back Neill if he's fit. Not good to change a winning side.

cockney hammer · Post by **cockney hammer** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:16 pm

THE GIBBINS wrote: you think they fill it?

might just do it

happyhammer7 · Post by **happyhammer7** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:17 pm

jacko wrote:He'll keep the same team, won't he? Maybe bring back Neill if he's fit. Not good to change a winning side.

Neill back in for Spector without a shadow of a doubt, if he is fit. Might see Parker come back in, cant see Ljunberg starting though. Ashton to start instead of Bobby, he is a bit off the boil at the moment.

Minto is Our Leader · Post by **Minto is Our Leader** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:18 pm

Can't wait for this one. Definately need to get one over on the whinging c*nt that is Wh*lan. Hoping for a better atmosphere than the Citeh game... It's not kids for a quid though is it?

bluebutterfly · Post by **bluebutterfly** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:19 pm

cockney hammer wrote:

Nah they won't need 2 seats mate, you been drinking :lol:

03H · Post by **03H** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:20 pm

Minto is Our Leader wrote:Can't wait for this one. Definately need to get one over on the whinging c*nt that is Wh*lan. Hoping for a better atmosphere than the Citeh game... It's not kids for a quid though is it?

Yes, it is kids for a quid. :lol:

Minto is Our Leader · Post by **Minto is Our Leader** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:21 pm

happyhammer7 wrote: Neill back in for Spector without a shadow of a doubt, if he is fit. Might see Parker come back in, cant see Ljunberg starting though. Ashton to start instead of Bobby, he is a bit off the boil at the moment.

Yeah, that sounds about right... I'm assuming your replacing Mullins with Parker? I know that changing winning sides isn't that good a thing to do but with the talent that we have out we should be looking at bringing these players in to create a winning side...

I would also point out that although a winning side, we have won just one game. I normally take a winning side to be one that has a unbeaten run of 2-3 games before classing it as a winning side.

happyhammer7 · Post by **happyhammer7** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:21 pm

cockney hammer wrote:
might just do it

Don't think so, might have to downgrade to meet low demand

[/img]

D&G · Post by **D&G** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:22 pm

Good if ever a man needed armed guards at a game it's this one :lol:

Minto is Our Leader · Post by **Minto is Our Leader** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:23 pm

03H wrote:Yes, it is kids for a quid. :lol:

There goes the atmosphere then, parents moaning about the language and 10 year old kids standing on seats. :shock:

happyhammer7 · Post by **happyhammer7** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:24 pm

Minto is Our Leader wrote: Yeah, that sounds about right... I'm assuming your replacing Mullins with Parker? I know that changing winning sides isn't that good a thing to do but with the talent that we have out we should be looking at bringing these players in to create a winning side...

I would also point out that although a winning side, we have won just one game. I normally take a winning side to be one that has a unbeaten run of 2-3 games before classing it as a winning side.

Yes it is a winning side, but it was a winning side against a very poor Birmingham side. Mullins is definately a player I would use only in away games if possible, as he plays a more defensive room. However for home games, we need more attacking players in the starting line up.

03H · Post by **03H** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:25 pm