Good stuff, as always CH. Thanks again
I have to take issue with the article about Henderson
It's just drivel. Goes to show that any moron can get their views published...
Apart from constantly contradicting himself, and writing in a style you'd be disappointed to find a 15 year old using, it's just b*llocks.
Talk about waffle....
cockney hammer wrote:
All Over Before It Even Began?
There have been very obvious strange signings by all managers, at all clubs. However, none seem stranger than Stephen Henderson’s.
This signing has dumbfounded me for some time...
I can understand the logic behind the signing, and the reasoning for the signing.
Well can you? Can't you? Do you? Don't you?
All that guff to essentially make the point that he couldn't see why we brought Henderson to the club....
It is becoming apparent that Allardyce has either lost ‘interest’ with Henderson, or he never favoured him in the first place
Not it isn't...
Seems blindingly obvious to me. There's no hidden agenda, Sam hasn't lost interest, and it's unlikely he'd have brought a player to the club he never favoured in the first place....
How about, Sam signed a young player with potential and promise, who had in no way proved himself. As is often the case with young "prospects", you hope the player will improve and step up, but it's no great surprise if they don't. After watching him for a year Sam has come to the conclusion that he's not going to step up to the point where he is anywhere near good enough for West Ham.....
No different to say, Maynard or Baldock. It's not about
Sam Allardyce and his transfer policy on goalkeepers . It's just simply the case that you win some, and you lose some, and on this occasion the player hasn't been good enough