New stadium vs redeveloping UP vs OS

All you need to know about West Ham United FC's potential move to Stratford.

Moderators: Romford, Rio, Gnome, Northern Paulo, Lost Hammer, bonehead, chalks, goes2eleven, Alf Garnett's (Ex) Missus, bristolhammerfc, Wheels, sicknote

Re: New stadium vs redeveloping UP vs OS

Postby Pedant on Wed Mar 28, 2012 1:07 pm

Hampshire Hammer wrote:I love the fact that you guys are arguing about whether club will be able to renew the lease after 99 years on a stadium that seems to have been designed with a 25 years lifetime in mind at the most. Just wait until the stadium needs major refurbishment then see how good it is to be playing in a government owned asset. :(
All perfectly normal in commercial property. I would stake my house on the stadium not being in government ownership beyond the 2017 WACs.

Either way, the law is still the law.
Pedant
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 6:28 pm

Re: New stadium vs redeveloping UP vs OS

Postby taffhammer on Tue Apr 03, 2012 1:02 pm

Will our owners be keeping an eye on Villa's plans for a trail standing area ? If we stayed at the Boleyn and with a new East stand to be built the timing of including an area for standing could make for a good reason to stay.
User avatar
taffhammer
 
Posts: 1378
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:37 pm
Location: from the wick of hackney to the seaside

Previous

Return to The Olympic Stadium

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests