bitter-iron-ny wrote:Since Kizer is the starter I didn't count him as a back up.
more accurately, every Browns quarterback is a starter :lol:warp wrote: every browns' quarterback is a back up!
Moderators: Gnome, last.caress, Wilko1304, Rio, bristolhammerfc, the pink palermo, chalks
bitter-iron-ny wrote:Since Kizer is the starter I didn't count him as a back up.
more accurately, every Browns quarterback is a starter :lol:warp wrote: every browns' quarterback is a back up!
Super Bowl LII OddsMega Ron wrote:I'm going to look into it.
I reckon it should be around 300 to 1.
i knew it, you're keeping my starting mum all for yourself, you barstool!Mega Ron wrote:Your mum is a back up.
truebitter-iron-ny wrote:more accurately, every Browns quarterback is a starter :lol:
Makes no sense. Unless the thinking is that Adrian Peterson is still a difference maker? Can't see that with a offense that is so pass oriented and has two of it's starting OL out. They do have a last place schedule (means winnable games against Bears, Jets and Rams) but are in a tough division. Even if Cam Newton is injured long-term and Carolina struggles, they still have to finish better than Atlanta and TB. Would be surprised if they make the playoffs.fjthegrey wrote:Why have the Saints been back so heavily?
If Janikowski does not take a pay cut from the $ 4M due to him this year, they will go with the Australian kicker they have on their books.bitter-iron-ny wrote:Janikowski a doubt for the Raiders and they're auditioning kickers off the street.
.
Not save as such, as if he stays on the books they have to pay his $ 4M irrespective.Mega Ron wrote:How much do they need to save?
Jack Del Rio was evasive in questions about Raiders kicker Sebastian Janikowski. The coach would not address whether Janikowski was asked to take a pay cut, offering only that the kicker tryouts the team held Monday were because of concerns over Janikowski’s health.Mega Ron wrote:How much do they need to save?