Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

The very best posts from KUMB over the years ...

Moderator: Gnome

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby Trap1 on Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:54 pm

DanielHammer wrote:some sort of action needs to be taken to raise awareness of our situatio and to try and push through a sale, having names such as cottee and brooking on board definately helps.


Unfortunately a lot of our support is apathetic, a protest would be great as it would show heart and passion.

It's not the first time though, the members of WHISTLE tried and faced financial ruin but had little support from their fellow supporters.

CB Holdings don't care about you, they care more for their creditors. They spin, they lie, they are men trying to save a banking institution and not West ham utd.

The staff are angry, former players that care angry, now it's time for the people who count to show their feelings.
Trap1
 
Posts: 8372
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 1:55 pm

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby bristolhammerfc on Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:58 pm

Apparently the club were acting like a bloke at a car boot sale who has an hour left.

Prices were tumbling on all the goods and not choosy about who buys.

Better kiss January goodbye too.

It does beg the question will the bank cut its losses if we are in Danger of relegation and increase the debt by investing, or keep the overall debt low and risk relegation?

After all Newcastle may still sell for £100 mill
User avatar
bristolhammerfc
 
Posts: 4607
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 5:50 pm
Location: Only responsible for what I say not what you understand

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby Denbighammer on Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:02 pm

bristolhammerfc wrote:Apparently the club were acting like a bloke at a car boot sale who has an hour left.



And you're basing that on?
User avatar
Denbighammer
 
Posts: 7511
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 7:53 pm
Location: Dodging, Dipping, Diving, Ducking and Dodging.

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby West Ham Matt on Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:05 pm

We at least offered Upson to Spurs..
User avatar
West Ham Matt
Karl Pilkington
 
Posts: 14874
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 4:51 pm

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby Jackanakanory on Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:08 pm

Personally I would take relegation and/or a ten point hit to be rid of CB Holdings/Duxbury etc etc.
User avatar
Jackanakanory
 
Posts: 6045
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 2:56 pm
Location: Equidistant between chit-chat and analysis

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby Matt of iron on Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:12 pm

West Ham Matt wrote:We at least offered Upson to Sp*rs..



No we didn't, Harry inquired about him and we told him the price.
User avatar
Matt of iron
 
Posts: 13912
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Studying Duckernomics with Chuck D.

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby bristolhammerfc on Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm

without going into too much detail, we offered Upson, Faubert and Spector to clubs in the last hour of Deadline day.

I have previously stated my source.
User avatar
bristolhammerfc
 
Posts: 4607
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 5:50 pm
Location: Only responsible for what I say not what you understand

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby JonG86 on Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:34 pm

West Ham Matt wrote:We at least offered Upson to Sp*rs..


Where did you hear that?
User avatar
JonG86
 
Posts: 5478
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:35 pm

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby West Ham Matt on Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:34 pm

Matt of iron wrote:

No we didn't, Harry inquired about him and we told him the price.


Harry's initial quote was "it was something that was put to us".

He didn't deal with it, Daniel Levy did. So it sounds like we went straight to him.
User avatar
West Ham Matt
Karl Pilkington
 
Posts: 14874
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 4:51 pm

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby JonG86 on Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:37 pm

West Ham Matt wrote:Harry's initial quote was "it was something that was put to us".

He didn't deal with it, Daniel Levy did. So it sounds like we went straight to him.


Or Upson was being shopped around by his agent.
User avatar
JonG86
 
Posts: 5478
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:35 pm

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby Matt of iron on Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:47 pm

West Ham Matt wrote:
Harry's initial quote was "it was something that was put to us".

He didn't deal with it, Daniel Levy did. So it sounds like we went straight to him.



That's what he said about the Anton - Hutton deal, he said they made an inquiry about Upson but didn't bother anymore after the price
User avatar
Matt of iron
 
Posts: 13912
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Studying Duckernomics with Chuck D.

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby West Ham Matt on Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:51 pm

West Ham Matt wrote:
Harry's initial quote was "it was something that was put to us".

He didn't deal with it, Daniel Levy did. So it sounds like we went straight to him.



Matt of iron wrote:That's what he said about the Anton - Hutton deal, he said they made an inquiry about Upson but didn't bother anymore after the price


The quotes on Sky, which I'm trying to find, applied "it was something that was put to us" to Upson. He commented that Anton was never a runner.
User avatar
West Ham Matt
Karl Pilkington
 
Posts: 14874
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 4:51 pm

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby Matt of iron on Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:57 pm

I can't find the quotes either rather annoyingly but 99% sure that's what was said.
User avatar
Matt of iron
 
Posts: 13912
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Studying Duckernomics with Chuck D.

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby Porfirio on Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:19 pm

Matt of iron wrote:I can't find the quotes either rather annoyingly but 99% sure that's what was said.


video is here, he says that the Anton Ferdinand deal was something that was put to him and Levy made enquiries about Upson but it was never going to happen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXrWyRPMHP4
User avatar
Porfirio
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: Quahog

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby Matt of iron on Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:21 pm

Porfirio wrote:
video is here, he says that the Anton Ferdinand deal was something that was put to him and Levy made enquiries about Upson but it was never going to happen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXrWyRPMHP4





Love U xxx
User avatar
Matt of iron
 
Posts: 13912
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Studying Duckernomics with Chuck D.

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby hadleighhammer on Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:52 pm

bristolhammerfc wrote:I fear another last day nail biter, avoiding relegation.


Excellent. Can't beat a good relegation scrap. :arry: :crest:
User avatar
hadleighhammer
 
Posts: 7969
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 6:18 pm
Location: On my computer trying to keep up with the Sky fixture changes

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby JonG86 on Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:56 pm



Is it just me, or does Harry really love his left arm in this video?
User avatar
JonG86
 
Posts: 5478
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:35 pm

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby Up the Junction on Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:20 pm

Matt of iron wrote:That's what he said about the Anton - Hutton deal, he said they made an inquiry about Upson but didn't bother anymore after the price

To clear this up, when Sky first showed the 'interview' with Redknapp in his car it was cut so that the comment Matt quoted was broadcast immediately after the Upson quote. This wasn't the case when it (a re-edited version) was later broadcast, at which point it became clear that the comment related to Anton Ferdinand, as Matt correctly points out.

Bristol - how does your source explain Upson (etc) still being here on September 1st in that case? I assume they're not suggesting the decision was made on the morning of the deadline?
User avatar
Up the Junction
Thinks he owns the place
 
Posts: 36729
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 1:03 am

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby w6hammer on Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:33 pm

Trap1 wrote:
Unfortunately a lot of our support is apathetic, a protest would be great as it would show heart and passion.

It's not the first time though, the members of WHISTLE tried and faced financial ruin but had little support from their fellow supporters.

CB Holdings don't care about you, they care more for their creditors. They spin, they lie, they are men trying to save a banking institution and not West ham utd.

The staff are angry, former players that care angry, now it's time for the people who count to show their feelings.


Jackanakanory wrote:Personally I would take relegation and/or a ten point hit to be rid of CB Holdings/Duxbury etc etc.


i`m inclined to agree with both these posts.what`s the point in being in the premiership if you aint got a pot to piss in and cant invest and improve a team?
w6hammer
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:40 pm

Re: Scott Duxbury: The KUMB Q&A

Postby w4hammer on Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:36 pm

does anyone have any idea when the "front of a butchers apron" accounts will come out, and we can see in all our glory what a fabulous job our fearless duxbury has done in running the club for the past four or so year - blowing millions on....nothing? And no doubt paying himself £500K plus a year.

If we did nothing else as a group of fans we should at least try and make our club obey the rule of law, albeit accounting law...after all, scotty boy, what have you got to hide?!
User avatar
w4hammer
 
Posts: 7129
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:22 pm
Location: ..my heart says... West Ham.. my head says ...West Ham

PreviousNext

Return to KUMB Hall of Fame

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest