sunday's gossip includes west ham

An archive of Cockney Hammer's West Ham-related daily news digests.

Moderator: Gnome

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby MB on Sun Jun 28, 2009 6:53 pm

I'm not a massive fan of Anton, but he is a steal at £2m. I'd much rather see him alongsode Upson though rather than instead of!
User avatar
MB
Cricket's Darren Anderton
 
Posts: 11696
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:13 pm
Location: It is what it is!

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby Bamber Gascoigne on Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:04 pm

Denbighammer wrote:Sounds like one Julian Faubert about two years ago - any old clogger can look mustard on youtube!


My comment "would be a great acquisition" were based on seeing him play for Lyon / Ivory Coast mate - not you tube!

"clogger" Headbanger
User avatar
Bamber Gascoigne
 
Posts: 2024
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 7:12 pm
Location: 51° 31′ 55″ N, 0° 2′ 22″ E

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby West Dan on Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:04 pm

Scaloni Is The Messiah wrote:"We want to build a team around our youth products."


Anton is one of our youth products :wink:
User avatar
West Dan
 
Posts: 2353
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 8:16 pm
Location: Peterborough & BM Upper

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby westlondonhammer on Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:05 pm

MB wrote:I'm not a massive fan of Anton, but he is a steal at £2m. I'd much rather see him alongsode Upson though rather than instead of!


I agree with that... for 2 million quid, he would be a very good signing
User avatar
westlondonhammer
 
Posts: 11164
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 7:41 pm
Location: Johannesburg

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby Scaloni Is The Messiah on Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:07 pm

West Dan wrote:Anton is one of our youth products :wink:


Yeah, that's what I'm saying. That's the message we'd be sending to Spence and N'Gala if we got Anton back - 'we want to build a team around academy products'. I imagine it's more encouraging to see loads of academy products in the team than if you're at Chelsea or somewhere and the best an academy product can hope for is ten minutes off the bench before being sent out on loan to the championship.
Scaloni Is The Messiah
 
Posts: 9296
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:44 pm

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby prophet:marginal on Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:08 pm

If his contract with Sunderland was for 4 years, they've probably only paid £2M of the actual fee so far.

If it is true that Bruce isn't interested, then I can see that we may be able to get the £2M deal, but no-one else can.

For me, its a backwards step, especially if we're losing Upson in the process.
User avatar
prophet:marginal
 
Posts: 18573
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 9:54 pm
Location: One stimulus reason If you've got the most

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby Chuck D on Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:31 pm

I'd be happy to see Lips back, but not at the expense of Upson.
User avatar
Chuck D
Rebel without a pause
 
Posts: 13291
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Fishing

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby Scaloni Is The Messiah on Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:47 pm

Chuck D wrote:I'd be happy to see Lips back, but not at the expense of Upson.


Obviously, I'd rather it didn't happen, but if we need to make £10m somewhere, that would be the way I'd want us to do it rather than, say, sell Parker.
Scaloni Is The Messiah
 
Posts: 9296
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:44 pm

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby Happyhammer93 on Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:58 pm

If we could get Anton for £2m then yes, but only if it meant we also kept Upson.
User avatar
Happyhammer93
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 5:13 pm
Location: Northampton

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby MB on Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:08 pm

Scaloni Is The Messiah wrote:Obviously, I'd rather it didn't happen, but if we need to make £10m somewhere, that would be the way I'd want us to do it rather than, say, sell Parker.


Really? I rate Parker, but the 25 odd games a season you get out of him are a luxury compared to having a decent centre half.

Parker I could live without (we will for at least 10 games a season anyway), but we'd seriously struggle without Upson.
User avatar
MB
Cricket's Darren Anderton
 
Posts: 11696
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:13 pm
Location: It is what it is!

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby Chuck D on Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:18 pm

Scaloni Is The Messiah wrote:
Obviously, I'd rather it didn't happen, but if we need to make £10m somewhere, that would be the way I'd want us to do it rather than, say, sell Parker.


We dont need to sell anyone. Scott and his new mate said so.
User avatar
Chuck D
Rebel without a pause
 
Posts: 13291
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Fishing

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby Awbis on Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:19 pm

Why is it always an either/or scenario?

I say yes for 2M and keep everyone!!!!


See optimism is soooo easy when you try!
User avatar
Awbis
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 9:13 pm
Location: Nothing to see here...move on

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby Dicksie's Right Boot on Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:24 pm

If we lose Upson, it won't be our decision. It will be for professional ambition....more more likely the cash on offer!! :thdn:
User avatar
Dicksie's Right Boot
 
Posts: 550
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:15 pm
Location: Closer to despair than ecstasy

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby claret parrot on Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:24 pm

Selling Anton for £8m was great business. Buying him back at £2m is also very good business but I don't think I'd want him as a starting centre back, and would he be content as a squad player? Also his wage expectations would need pruning.

Upson has been excellent for us and we probably owe our top half finish to him. On the other hand he is 30, he is ambitious, and he is worth big money now, maybe not so in a year or two. Should we cash in? We have Collins who is very capable (if a little too injury prone) and Tomkins who has emerged as an excellent young defender. We also have Bondz N'Gala, Jordan Spence, and one or two others in the pipeline. We also have Davenport who's a very decent back up. It's a tricky one because our defence will be the poorer for selling Upson, but if we can invest the money in new players it may be worth doing. Arsenal need bolstering at the back and if we could get a sizeable fee plus Bendtner coming back the other way ... just an idea.

As for Gudjohsson there's no doubting his pedigree but what we need is an out and out striker. Not someone who'll play deep and make chances (EG), and not someone who is basically a wide player, but a proper striker with quality, awareness and who knows where the goal is ... someone like Dean Ashton in fact. Please let's give him one final chance to show what he is capable of. If he breaks down or gets crocked again, I swear I'll shut the fukc up and go with flow.
User avatar
claret parrot
 
Posts: 3739
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: caught between the devil and the deep fried camembert.

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby libero on Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:50 pm

West Ham want to bring Anton Ferdinand back to Upton Park from Sunderland in a cut-price deal. New Black Cats boss Steve Bruce does not want the 24-year-old, who moved to Wearside last summer, and Hammers boss Gianfranco Zola will make a £2m bid.
News of the World


Don't like to gloat, but I said this would happen back in April and mentioned it even earlier. I hope it comes off because I think Anton will become a very good CB in the next few years and because I don't like seeing WH Academy players at other clubs.

Hope it's not taken as an excuse to sell Upson though :?
libero
 
Posts: 3916
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:42 pm

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby upton o'good on Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:12 pm

libero wrote:West Ham want to bring Anton Ferdinand back to Upton Park from Sunderland in a cut-price deal. New Black Cats boss Steve Bruce does not want the 24-year-old, who moved to Wearside last summer, and Hammers boss Gianfranco Zola will make a £2m bid.
News of the World


Don't like to gloat, but I said this would happen back in April and mentioned it even earlier. I hope it comes off because I think Anton will become a very good CB in the next few years and because I don't like seeing WH Academy players at other clubs.

Hope it's not taken as an excuse to sell Upson though :?



The question anyone welcoming a move for Anton (with Sunderland taking a big loss on the price paid for him only 12 months ago) has to ask is: do you really think you are a better judge of a centreback than Steve Bruce. Like Bruce or loathe him, and my view is that he has done spectacurarly well at Wigan, one thing he can surely do is judge a centre back.
User avatar
upton o'good
 
Posts: 9356
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 10:50 am
Location: On the sofa, teaching Joanna to sing bubbles

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby kthammer on Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:20 pm

[/quote]


The question anyone welcoming a move for Anton (with Sunderland taking a big loss on the price paid for him only 12 months ago) has to ask is: do you really think you are a better judge of a centreback than Steve Bruce. Like Bruce or loathe him, and my view is that he has done spectacurarly well at Wigan, one thing he can surely do is judge a centre back.[/quote]

Agreed. Have we no pride? Do we think we should be better than Bruce and Sunderland or not? Anton back is a ridiculous step back
User avatar
kthammer
 
Posts: 4403
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 1:26 pm
Location: Surrounded by Gooners

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby E13madness on Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:57 am

No eff way do i want to see Anton back at upton park.
I think collins, gabbs, tomkins are way better then in.
User avatar
E13madness
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 1:14 am
Location: australia

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby Blažo on Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:18 am

Let's hope Upson doesn't leave, but if that happens, signing Anton for less than 3 mil. would be a good deal.
Gabs and Collins with constant injury problems, and Tomka still not much experienced (massive potential, though) ... would be useful.
User avatar
Blažo
 
Posts: 179
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 6:12 pm

Re: sunday's gossip includes west ham

Postby libero on Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:32 am

upton o'good wrote:
The question anyone welcoming a move for Anton (with Sunderland taking a big loss on the price paid for him only 12 months ago) has to ask is: do you really think you are a better judge of a centreback than Steve Bruce. Like Bruce or loathe him, and my view is that he has done spectacurarly well at Wigan, one thing he can surely do is judge a centre back.


I don't have the same faith as you do in Bruce's judgement on CBs or anything for that matter. As for him doing "spectacurarly well at Wigan", I think that could be regarded as a little over the top, don't you?

The history of football is full of players who have done well at one club, poorly at another, players who flourish under one manager and flounder under another. Nothing new in that.

The Anton/Bruce case in my opinion is not a simple case of Bruce not rating Anton, but rather Bruce wanting to have some cash to play with and to stamp his authority on the club. Keane idiotically paid well over the odds for Anton and chances are that Sunderland haven't got beyond paying the 2 million for him. Bruce has the choice of carrying on paying the other 6m, looking for a buyer who'll cover the original transfer, or cutting his losses, sending him back to West Ham and freeing up at least a part of that 6m for his summer transfer kitty. He's chosen the latter, and I don't think that's necessarily a reflection on his valuation of Anton Ferdinand as a CB.

And for West Ham, that all works out to be good business
libero
 
Posts: 3916
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:42 pm

PreviousNext

Return to KUMB News Digests

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests