I voted Intermarket. No solid reason-maybe the lesser of all evils, though that's going a tad far
I'm basing my views on nothing much really. Just gut feelings, based on what I read on here, as well as what the papers have to say (which varies wildly depending which you read-it seems at least one paper is claiming victory for each of the candidates, so most of which has to be counted as bull****)
I can't remember who I voted for last time, or if I even voted
As I see it - my gut feelings
G&S - not really against them, do kind of like them, and feel that they would provide stability, even if it is just to stop us going backwards. But as the puffins will still be on board in some way, were they to win, no thanks
TF - I do kind of feel positive about him. West Ham fan, seems like a smiley chap, obviously done okay in previous business ventures. Must admit his twattering puts me off. I guess he'd be my second choice
Intermarket - gut feeling says they are the best option, not for any concrete reason. Rumours only, but seem to be well backed, and maybe by some with a bit of love for West Ham
Italian geezer - no thanks. Gut feeling screams DODGY, for no discernable reason. His shades hardly help. His track record seems okay, but where will his money come from? Have visions of henchmen, horses heads under pillows....Don't see how knowing Zola makes the blindest bit of difference. Managers tend to come and go a lot quicker than chairmen. Whilst I appreciate a bit of Italian input, in terms of Zola's ideas, I don't want us to become too Italian
TPP - Not convinced he'll be able to get us to the CL in 5 years or less, so no thanks