Hold the Back Page - re west ham

Does exactly what it says on the tin - the forum for football-related discussion.

Moderators: Lost Hammer, bonehead, chalks, goes2eleven, Alf Garnett's (Ex) Missus, bristolhammerfc, Wheels, sicknote, Romford, Rio, Gnome, Northern Paulo

Hold the Back Page - re west ham

Postby Bishops Finger on Tue May 22, 2012 12:05 am

This evening on Sky Sports 1 with Brian Woolnough (The Daily Star), Paul Smith (The Sun), Sam Wallace (The Independent) and Martin Samuel (The Daily Mail & self professed West Ham supporter but strangely silent during the discussion).

Discussing West Ham, they said it was vital for West Ham to be in the Premier League when the move to the Olympic Stadium comes about or it would mean a financial meltdown for the club. The concensus was that 6 or 7 players were needed, they thought Robert Green would probably go and that BFS was a pretty shrewd operator in the transfer and loan market - Joe Cole's name was mentioned as someone the fans would welcome back, I don't remember any other names being discussed.

One thing I thought interesting was that the current lot of players would cost an extra £7 million with increases in contracts due to going up to the Premier League, and that Kevin Nolan was currently on £55k a week!

Paul Smith was pretty adamant that Southampton, and particularly Reading, would struggle in the Premier League and were pretty sure of going down because their boards would not be prepared to make the required investment.

Nothing startling really!
User avatar
Bishops Finger
 
Posts: 2045
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:41 am

Re: Hold the Back Page - re west ham

Postby psychoscoredthelot on Tue May 22, 2012 9:53 am

sounds riveting :lol:
psychoscoredthelot
 
Posts: 2785
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:23 pm

Re: Hold the Back Page - re west ham

Postby sendô on Tue May 22, 2012 10:06 am

I don't know if I'd agree that we need 6 or 7 new players in the sense that they are saying we do - I assume otherwise we will go down. I think the team we've got could probably just about survive, mainly because there are enough other teams that will struggle. What we do need to do is invest in key positions and try and push into mid table rather than fight a relegation scrap. We shouldn't just be aiming for survival, because if you fall slightly short you go down. If Fulham can come almost 7th with the team they've got then it isn't inconceivable that we could aim for 7th.
User avatar
sendô
 
Posts: 14881
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 1:41 pm
Location: in the pessimistically optimistic camp.

Re: Hold the Back Page - re west ham

Postby MB on Tue May 22, 2012 10:15 am

sendô wrote:We shouldn't just be aiming for survival, because if you fall slightly short you go down. If Fulham can come almost 7th with the team they've got then it isn't inconceivable that we could aim for 7th.


That was always the Pardew approach. Aim for top half and you'll finish 12th. Aim for 17th and you'll probably be relegated!

Fulham is a good example of what you can do with three or four very talented players and a bunch of journeymen grafters filling in the gaps. A good manager who understands the tactical aspects of the game of course helps!
User avatar
MB
Cricket's Darren Anderton
 
Posts: 11675
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:13 pm
Location: It is what it is!

Re: Hold the Back Page - re west ham

Postby MS in the West on Tue May 22, 2012 10:41 am

sendô wrote:I don't know if I'd agree that we need . If Fulham can come almost 7th with the team they've got then it isn't inconceivable that we could aim for 7th.


Fulham have come in, or close to 10th in the Prem for years now. I think you're massively underestimating their team

As to these journos. It's a bit like joournalism eating itself in that programme. It's a magazine programme that asks journos their opinion - rather than one that goes out and gets news and opinions from others/those who know. Can't see why we should take the slightest notice of these people who often have less judgement than the average fan, consistently make up stories, stir things up, nick things from fan websites and so on. Now if they were asking Gary Neville his view....
User avatar
MS in the West
 
Posts: 1967
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: The West

Re: Hold the Back Page - re west ham

Postby kayahammer on Tue May 22, 2012 10:43 am

psychoscoredthelot wrote:sounds riveting :lol:


^^^^^^^^^^^^
User avatar
kayahammer
 
Posts: 1773
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:59 am
Location: East of Eden

Re: Hold the Back Page - re west ham

Postby Roby on Tue May 22, 2012 7:23 pm

I've been a big fan of this show since my mum and dad got Sky when I was a kid back in about 1994.

I remember when they used to have Jimmy Hill hosting it!

Not too keen on some of the posh twats they have on like Henry Winter but generally it's a good show to watch on a Sunday morning with a bagel and a couple of cups of tea.
User avatar
Roby
 
Posts: 1821
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:07 pm

Re: Hold the Back Page - re west ham

Postby Dyl on Tue May 22, 2012 7:40 pm

Our team unchanged wouldn't get relegated. A few players in will mean we'll finish about 14th.

Reading, Norwich and Wigan going down next year. Swansea, Stoke, Villa and Southampton all fighting out the spots just above.
User avatar
Dyl
 
Posts: 8968
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 4:29 pm
Location: Developing a man-crush on Winston Reid

Re: Hold the Back Page - re west ham

Postby mywhufc on Tue May 22, 2012 9:08 pm

Dyl wrote:Our team unchanged wouldn't get relegated. A few players in will mean we'll finish about 14th.

Reading, Norwich and Wigan going down next year. Swansea, Stoke, Villa and Southampton all fighting out the spots just above.

Allardyce was right, we are deluded.
1/2 the team got us relegated, prob lose green, and Parker jumped a year ago, so a worse team than what we went down with but you think our team unchanged wouldn't go down.
User avatar
mywhufc
 
Posts: 2086
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:25 pm

Re: Hold the Back Page - re west ham

Postby dapablo on Tue May 22, 2012 9:13 pm

mywhufc wrote:Allardyce was right, we are deluded.
1/2 the team got us relegated, prob lose green, and Parker jumped a year ago, so a worse team than what we went down with but you think our team unchanged wouldn't go down.


..but we have a manager and a captain now, a vast improvemennt on just a Parker.
User avatar
dapablo
Sourpuss, grumpy face
 
Posts: 4464
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 12:12 am

Re: Hold the Back Page - re west ham

Postby Side of Ham on Tue May 22, 2012 10:41 pm

We have a set up that doesn't roll over now, before it was one player that didn't roll over the rest with the managers tactics did.
User avatar
Side of Ham
 
Posts: 3999
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:30 pm


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: anjado, Hummer_I_mean_Hammer, ParisTheHammer, TJ_AUS and 49 guests