Text  Larger | Smaller | Default

NewsNow

Dead horse lives: Spurs granted review


Filed: Wednesday, 24th August 2011
By: Staff Writer


Tottenham have been granted a judicial review of the decision to award use of the Olympic Stadium to West Ham United.

The north London club, backed by Leyton Orient returned to the High Court this morning to seek a review of the decision despite coming close to calling things off last night, when it was revealed that they were close to agreeing a deal with the Government to redevelop a site close to their White Hart Lane ground.

It had been widely felt that today's appeal by Spurs and Orient would once again be rejected. However QC Dinah Rose, representing the Premier League club, convinced the judge to allow the two clubs to allow an application for judicial review of the Olympic Park Legacy Company's decision, made in February.

Rose argued that as West Ham's combined bid with Newham Council was dependent on a 40million loan from the latter to the former, this constituted state aid and was therefore illegal under European law.

That view was supported by Adam Lewis QC, representing Leyton Orient, who suggested that the Premier League's decision to allow West Ham to move closer to Orient's Brisbane Road stadium had been compromised as a result of United's relegation last season.

However the OPLC - represented by Richard Gordon QC - argued that Tottenham's claims were without foundation.

The judge summised that Tottenham and Orient did make valid points that required further investigation, adding that their was some confusion as to the exact nature of the partnership between West Ham and Newham Council.

The decision means that both clubs must return to the courts on Tuesday, 18th October for a full hearing into the decision to award use of the stadium to West Ham.





Related News

   arrow   Olympic Stadium overlooked for World Cup dates [26th Apr 2018]
   arrow   Fans' support breeds confidence, claims Moyes [26th Apr 2018]
   arrow   In brief - Wednesday's news round-up [18th Apr 2018]
   arrow   Post-match press conference: David Moyes v Stoke City [video] [17th Apr 2018]
   arrow   In brief - Tuesday's news round-up [17th Apr 2018]
   arrow   Noble issues war cry [16th Apr 2018]
   arrow   Win and survive, says Brooking [16th Apr 2018]
   arrow   Pre-match press conference: David Moyes v Stoke City [video] [15th Apr 2018]
   arrow   Masuaku linked with Spurs and other transfer news  [12th Apr 2018]
   arrow   City date confirmed [12th Apr 2018]



Your Comments


Please note that this section is for comments relating to the above news item only. Any off-topic or abusive posts will be removed. Posts including either links and/or foul language are automatically filtered and will not be published. To engage in further discussion on any of our news stories, visit the KUMB Forums.

Not a member of the KUMB Forums? You may register for free membership here.

by Weldersspurs
09:24AM 25th Aug 2011
''Try to see what Levy is doing here, very very clever bluff. He has never wanted the Olympic Stadium, he always knew he would lose that. He is trying to get as much money for a new stadium in Tottenham and, just as importantly, planning permissions and rights attached to a new White Hart Lane.

The riots in Tottenham have helped his cause no end, now regeneration is needed. If, as Levy expects, the decision will be overturned due to Newham Council's 'state aid' help, you can expect the whole case to be dropped as soon as the Government help out with the new White Hart Lane.''

by GaryP
09:36PM 24th Aug 2011
''West Ham released a statement today

"In response to media inquiries, we can confirm that West Ham today received a document from Tottenham asking us to give up our claims against them in relation to the above [reported breaches of the Data Protection Act and Computer Misuse Act], in return for Tottenham withdrawing their judicial review proceedings. West Ham naturally refused."

That just fully establishes Tottenham's attitude towards this case, and why ultimately they will lose it. They deserve no help in any way.''

by tony
09:15PM 24th Aug 2011
''This is just a bargaining chip to get regeneration money from Boris for a new WHL. So far 8.5m before todays ruling and a commitment that this figure could rise.

You can keep the stadium, but it should be tied to WHUFC giving up the Boleyn Ground in a land swap.''

by SCOTT
04:19PM 24th Aug 2011
''Spurs and Orient really need to get a life. Can't they find better things to screw us with?!''

by J-Mo
04:03PM 24th Aug 2011
''This tiresome saga is now beginning to resemble Daniel Levy's own twisted take on the legendary 'Dead Parrot Sketch'...''

comments powered by Disqus
 
News Image




On This Day ...

One Year Ago
Ribman rolls onto island
West Ham United's ever popular 'Ribman' has been granted a pitch outside th...more
Three Years Ago
Gignac, Wilson, Lampard and Nolan: Tuesday's news
Get the very latest West Ham news in one place, with our new daily media round-up! ...more
Five Years Ago
Man City 2-1 West Ham Utd
West Ham United were predictably - yet narrowly - beaten at the City of Manchester stadium in today'...more