Filed: Wednesday, 23rd January 2013
By: Staff Writer
Sam Allardyce has denied an FA misconduct charge relating to comments he made about Phil Dowd following West Ham United's FA Cup exit at Old Trafford.
Referee Dowd failed to award West Ham a blatant penalty before awarding the home side a spot kick in almost identical circumstances later in the game - a situation that left Allardyce raging after the final whistle.
Choosing his words carefully during an interview with ITV, Allardyce said: "There's no doubt whatsoever about the difference between Rafael's hand ball and Jordan Spence's. Jordan Spence plays for West Ham away at Man United and Rafael plays at home at Old Trafford. It's got to be that simple when you see it."
Those comments were enough for the FA to hit the Hammers boss with a misconduct charge - one which Allardyce has now denied. As a result, he has requested a personal hearing with the FA.
A short staement on the FA's website read: "It is alleged Allardyce questioned the integrity of the match referee and/or match officials in general, and/or implied that the match referee and/or match officials in general were motivated by bias; and/or brought the game into disrepute in contravention of Rule E3(1)."
Amalfitano on his way [1st Sep 2014]
West Ham taking the Michael? [1st Sep 2014]
Deadline day: Italian giants join Richards race [1st Sep 2014]
Allardyce on... Southampton [30th Aug 2014]
West Ham Utd 1-3 Southampton [30th Aug 2014]
West Ham Utd v Southampton: half time report [30th Aug 2014]
Big Sam defends big signing [28th Aug 2014]
West Ham fail with Mexes bid [27th Aug 2014]
Maiga departs [27th Aug 2014]
comments powered by Disqus