Text  Larger | Smaller | Default


Chelsea 2-0 West Ham United

Filed: Sunday, 17th March 2013
By: Staff Writer

West Ham slipped to a predicatable defeat at Stamford Bridge this afternoon - a defeat aided by predictably one-sided refereeing.

Today it was Michael Oliver's turn to come to the aid of the wealthier club in order to preserve the Premier League's status quo - and Andy Carroll the one to suffer as a result.

Little will be made of it elsewhere but had Carroll's perfectly legitimate, first half strike been allowed to stand it may well have made for a different game, with Chelsea 1-0 up through Frank Lampard's 19th-minute opening goal at the time.

As it was, Eden Hazard's effort five minutes after the break was enough to see the home side take all three points with a comfortable 2-0 win.

The controversial moment came just three minutes after Lampard had taken advantage of some poor defending by West Ham to nod the Blues into a 19th-minute lead with his 200th goal for the west London club.

Matt Jarvis did incredibly well to retain possession on the left wing before centreing the ball for the advancing Carroll, who eased away from marker David Luiz before poking the ball over the line.

However match official Oliver - the Premier League's youngest referee at just 28 - immediately flagged for an infringement, presumably for a non-existent foul on Luiz, much to Carroll's bemusement.

Of course it had been a similar story at the Boleyn Ground earlier in the season when Kevin Nolan saw a perfectly legal 'goal' wiped out by Martin Atkinson in the corresponding fixture - even if West Ham eventually righted that particular wrong by going on to win 3-1.

And whilst few will be surprised at the perceived bias, once again there was further clear evidence that the Premier League's chosen officials are geared towards favouring the league's wealthier entities.

In addition to Carroll's 'goal', the decision to award a free-kick against Jarvis when he shrugged off his marker to leave him one-on-one with Petr Cech also left a bad taste in the mouths of West Ham fans who had made the short sojourn across town.

Of course, to blame today's defeat entirely on the referee would be churlish; West Ham, a freshly-promoted team created from the cast-offs of others and second division players were unsurprisingly second best on the day to a team stuffed with multi-million pound internationals.

Despite that, United gave a good account of themselves in the opening half and but for a little more luck (plus a higher standard of refereeing) could have gone into the break on level terms with Carroll and Collins both enjoying good chances.

However the second half was virtually one-way traffic and Hazard's goal five minutes after the restart - the result of a clever one-two with Juan Mata - was the very least Chelsea deserved from an efficient, if not top-class, second half performance.

Related News

   arrow   Hammers train - and sunbathe - in US heat [14th Mar 2018]
   arrow   Brooking, Noble, Gold & Stobbs : Monday's news [12th Mar 2018]
   arrow   Putting in the miles for Isla [8th Mar 2018]
   arrow   All change - April schedule altered [27th Feb 2018]
   arrow   The opposition view: Watford [12th Feb 2018]
   arrow   Chicharito, Collison, Cresswell & Hernandez: Monday's news [5th Feb 2018]
   arrow   Henry, Mario, Chicharito & Noble: Friday's news [2nd Feb 2018]
   arrow   West Ham land non-league star [1st Feb 2018]
   arrow   In brief - Wednesday's news round-up [31st Jan 2018]
   arrow   Moyes has learnt from his mistakes, says former Hammer [26th Jan 2018]

Your Comments

Please note that this section is for comments relating to the above news item only. Any off-topic or abusive posts will be removed. Posts including either links and/or foul language are automatically filtered and will not be published. To engage in further discussion on any of our news stories, visit the KUMB Forums.

Not a member of the KUMB Forums? You may register for free membership here.

by Ian O
02:25PM 18th Mar 2013
''Always interesting to see how others see a game.

Unfortunately, hands lightly placed on an opponent usually results in the latter falling over and the ref awarding a foul – although I do remember Carlton not being penalised in the reverse fixture when scoring.

Agreed, there was very little in Andy Carroll’s hands on the back of David Luiz and, perhaps five or ten years ago, the goal would have stood...but the fact remains he did ease / push Luiz out of the way. I like Andy Carroll and it’s great that he has such physical presence but players should realise that few officials will let such things pass these days without blowing the whistle. If he had kept his hands down the goal would have stood.

Of course, the ironical thing is how all the skirmishing in the penalty area at corners and set pieces goes unpunished.

Still, looking forward to the West Brom game....

by ChelseaR
08:25PM 17th Mar 2013
''West Ham were so outclassed in the last hour of this game that each of about six defensive players made at least two bookable fouls each - almost always on the Hazard and Mata who could have outplayed them in their sleep.''

comments powered by Disqus
News Image

On This Day ...

One Year Ago
Post-match press conference: Slaven Bilic vs Leicester City
Slaven Bilic felt that his side were hard done by against Leicester at the ...more
Three Years Ago
Collison credits Allardyce and Nolan for dressing room unity
Former Hammer Jack Collison believes that West Ham's re-establishment as a Premier League force is l...more
Five Years Ago
Allardyce disputes Carroll call
A naturally disappointed Sam Allardyce slammed referee Michael Oliver for ruling out what appeared t...more