Latest Opinion

There are few things more entertaining than a football club being bought by people who insist they are interested in the football.

Amanda Staveley’s flirtation with West Ham has provided a particularly enjoyable example. Staveley, having previously been involved in the Saudi-backed takeover of Newcastle United, apparently decided that what her life really needed was another English football club, only this time one in London, recently relegated and owned through a corporate structure that makes the average tax return look like a children’s colouring book.




Her consortium wanted to acquire a substantial stake in West Ham United, initially the Gold family's 25.1 per cent holding. This was not, importantly, a case of someone wandering into the club shop, buying a scarf and asking whether there was a season-ticket discount for shareholders. The intention was to obtain a meaningful foothold and influence at board level.

And why West Ham? Well, why not? It is a famous London football club with a large support, an enormous stadium, a substantial commercial profile and the sort of unrealised potential which investors love because it means they can spend several hundred million pounds explaining how much unrealised potential there is.

There is also the London Stadium. This is where football and property begin to gaze meaningfully into each other’s eyes.

The stadium has always been an interesting proposition. West Ham play there, the taxpayer helped build it, athletics occasionally appears, and everyone involved has periodically attempted to explain precisely who owns what. It is the sort of arrangement that makes you suspect that somewhere in the basement there is a filing cabinet marked DO NOT OPEN UNTIL LAWYERS ARRIVE.

Staveley has also shown an interest in property investment, so West Ham offered something rather more substantial than 90 minutes of football twice a month. There was the club, the brand, the stadium and the wider opportunities presented by being a major football institution in one of the world's great cities.

Football clubs, after all, are no longer merely football clubs. They are entertainment businesses, property assets, global brands, social-media operations, hospitality companies and, occasionally, organisations which employ eleven men to kick a ball while millions of people shout at them. The football is almost incidental.

There was therefore nothing particularly surprising about Staveley's interest. What was slightly more surprising was that West Ham's existing shareholders did not simply roll out the red carpet. The problem with buying a football club is that somebody already owns it. And they tend to have opinions.




Daniel Kretinsky, who had already accumulated a substantial West Ham holding, ultimately exercised his rights and increased his stake to 46 per cent. David Sullivan's position subsequently became 40 per cent.

Staveley's attempted entrance was therefore rather like arriving at a party with a bottle of expensive champagne only to discover that the host has sold the house to somebody else.
This leaves Kretinsky in a rather interesting position.

He is now the largest shareholder without quite being the outright owner, which is an excellent arrangement if you enjoy power but dislike the inconvenience of having to pay for everything yourself. It also leaves West Ham with the sort of ownership structure that should reassure nobody who enjoys simplicity.

The Czech billionaire has been around West Ham for some time, but a 46 per cent stake is rather different from being a significant minority shareholder. It gives him considerably greater influence over what happens next. And what happens next is the interesting bit.

West Ham have just been relegated. The club needs to get back into the Premier League. It needs to manage its finances. It needs to rebuild a squad. It needs to decide what sort of club it wants to be. It needs to persuade supporters that the future is not simply an extended punishment for having enjoyed the 2023 Europa Conference League victory.

Meanwhile, three very wealthy people have rather different reasons for being interested in the same institution.

Sullivan has spent years as the dominant figure in the club's ownership. Kretinsky has steadily increased his investment. Staveley wanted to buy her way into the room. And the supporters, as usual, have the privilege of paying for the shirts while watching the billionaires negotiate over the furniture.




This is the peculiar modern economics of football. The supporters are told that the club belongs to them emotionally, spiritually and historically. The shareholders own it financially. The players own the pitch for 90 minutes. The manager owns the dressing room until he loses three games. And the lawyers own everything in between.

Staveley's interest in West Ham nevertheless tells us something important. Despite relegation, the club remains an attractive asset. That should not be dismissed. But attractiveness to investors and happiness for supporters are not necessarily the same thing.

An investor looks at West Ham and sees an asset with global potential. A supporter looks at West Ham and sees a club which recently got relegated. An investor sees the London Stadium.
A supporter sees the London Stadium and remembers the first season.

An investor sees commercial opportunities. A supporter sees the corner where he used to stand at Upton Park. An investor sees a long-term project. A supporter sees next Saturday. And that is where the interests of football and finance tend to diverge.

Amanda Staveley may yet return to West Ham in some form. Football ownership is rarely a story with a proper ending. It is more like a soap opera in which everybody has a solicitor and nobody is allowed to die.

For now, however, the Staveley bid appears to have been stopped by Kretinsky's increased stake. Which leaves West Ham where they have so often been: enormously valuable, chronically complicated and capable of turning the simplest question — Who owns the club? — into something requiring a flow chart, three accountants and a large glass of wine.

The supporters, meanwhile, will continue doing what they have always done. They will turn up. They will complain. They will hope. And they will watch increasingly wealthy people argue over a football club whose greatest financial asset remains the extraordinary willingness of ordinary people to keep paying for the privilege of having their weekends ruined.

* Like to share your thoughts on this article? Please visit the KUMB Forum to leave a comment.

* Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the highlighted author/s and do not necessarily represent or reflect the official policy or position of KUMB.com.