Big_Russ wrote:Same players as last year, same performances.

No Zola to blame this season though.

Dyl wrote:I'm with CH, who are all these w***ers clogging up KUMB?

Having a little patience and waiting instead of continuously hitting the 'post' button at busy times would really help.

NEVERSAYDIE wrote:Maybe I'm doting in my old age but I'm pretty sure he posted something quite a while ago about a loan deal for Cacie.

Your old memory appears to be better than my old memory NSD. Even fairer play, in that case!

ForeverHammers wrote:NOTW journo on twitter is source for Caidedo story.

Only about three days behind our own BaggioBergkamp!

There's snippets and there's rubbish and the rubbish might hype this place up but in the end it really is a waste of time. Anyone posting false info here will be slung off. Therefore you can safely assume that anyone who hasn't been slung off is not posting false info. That's all there is to it, if...

UtJ, the "Project" is ubiquitous. Albie, all I asked for were examples of Duxbury's purported serial lies. With respect, I'm not looking to examine in depth (not on this thread anyway). If anyone can do better than 'The Project' (which existed and is therefore not a fallacy) feel free to ...

West Ham Matt wrote:The "project"?

Like it or not, 'The Project' existed ...

miles wrote:The problem is that Duxbury said alot of things... and very few actually turned out to be true.

Care to offer the board a list of all these perceived misdemeanours, Miles/Bob?

bobd_uk wrote:When G&S took over, there was certainly a suggestion that all sponsorship, gate and TV money had been leveraged for a few seasons by the previous regime.

If you recall Bob, Scott Duxbury said in his KUMB.com Q&A last year that this summer would be the one in which we were able to spend.

west ham15 wrote:West Ham United have agreed a deal with Ajax for Serbia forward Miralem Sulejmani.

That's come out of nowhere.

il_martello_di_genovesi wrote:So I'm asking why the link between bad passing and a Czech hardman?

They're two unique and unrelated statements. I still don't have a clue what you're talking about.

il_martello_di_genovesi wrote:What does his passing have to do with being a hardman UTJ?

I don't know. What are you on about?

I'd be dissapointed to lose Kovac, he is an important squad player and a good professional. He wasn't thrown out of the Czech squad for nothing, Saludo. Radoslav Kovac is one of the worst passers of a football I've seen at the Boleyn in many, many years. Why we signed him permanently I'll never kno...

Hammer83 wrote:UTJ it doesn't help when that tinpot club think they can try and sign our best players.

It doesn't help either when our supporters come out with **** like this.

Russell - you wouldn't know if I've removed the posts in question, would you. Thanks for the concern though

Once again - if you want to discuss Stoke's transfer policy at length please find a Stoke foum to do it on, because it's of little interest to people visiting this site. Thanks.

Chuck D wrote:What was part one?

http://www.kumb.com/forum/viewtopic.php ... t#p2654253" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Chippenhammer wrote:Liverpool show interest in Hammers striker Cole
By Harry Harris, Football Correspondent

West Ham centre-forward Cole has rejected a move to Stoke City, but he would be open to the possibility of moving to Anfield this summer.

How convenient Pt II.

Charle Hammer wrote:Repeated post again

Submit button = press once and wait. Alien concept to some, I know, but it really is for only a few seconds.

BillUp wrote:I think they have done a fantastic job thus far ...

Really Bill? I'd never have guessed :lol:

aus_hammers wrote:word is that upson will be sold and samba will be brought in also expect us to bid for KPB if valon is off

You couldn't even call one when it was in front of your face fella

bobo wrote:http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Tr ... 46285.html

aka 'Today's round up of popular football forum gossip that we now present as our own'