West Ham Utd 1-1 Stoke City (11/04/15)

Relive every moment of every first team game since the beginning of the 2005/06 season. Our archive of matchday threads originally posted in the General Discussion Forum.

Moderator: Gnome

Post Reply
User avatar
PrinceH
Posts: 2378
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 6:12 pm

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by PrinceH »

Kouyate had another good game and fight better in both ends of the field, than anyone else.
Valencia had energy and a good first half.
Ginge does the things he can.

The rest disappointed us today, and Downing is a shadow of what he was earlier, played in the middle. Jenk and Cresswell have both lost momentum.

Really sad, sad changes from Sam! Song off to have Nolan on when we are one up. God help us...

Even if we conceded once again in overtime we should be pretty happy to go off the field with one point.
Having 35 percent possession at home against Stoke says it all...

Was this some sort of vengeance from Sam?
User avatar
sutts07
Posts: 13087
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 2:55 pm
Location: Block 112, a far cry from CR1
Has liked: 24 likes
Total likes: 547 likes

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by sutts07 »

WHU_Del wrote: Yes. If he wanted Morgan on, he should have put Morgan on. Or there's always the option of a double change. If he was going to put Morgan on for Valencia, but Sakho got injured, take them both off and put Morgan and Cole (or Nene) on at the same time.
Sorry mate, we are just going to have to agreeto disagree. I've never played under or seen a manager make a double sub on 50mins at 1-0 up.

I totally get that people are p!ssed off with Sam and I agree with those who say his time is up. But my point still stands, sometimes the players need to look at themselves. With the exception of Collins, Cresswell and Kouyate for his effort we looked like a team on the beach.

It was the players who didn't give a toss today, some will just heap that on Sam as well and say it is a reflection of him, but for me a pro player should put a shift in regardless.
User avatar
robert greenhio
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:08 am
Location: Paradise City

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by robert greenhio »

libero wrote:Thanks for everything Sam, but the last 2 matches have made me come off the fence
Time to go :crest:
This is how I feel as well. To go from Champs league spot at Christmas to (probably) bottom half of the table is a disastrous half season. Watching every other team have bundles more desire to win is embarrassing and boring, and inevitably this lack of desire leads to us conceding late goals far too often.
User avatar
_fortunes_
Posts: 1261
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:54 pm

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by _fortunes_ »

Sakho out for 2 - 3 apparently
Humbug
Posts: 2216
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2015 3:43 pm
Has liked: 47 likes
Total likes: 159 likes

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by Humbug »

IMHO, I think Stoke have an overall better squad than us. Maybe not defensively, but up front and midfield they are more determined, quicker and creative. Yes, some of our players are better and cost more but overall , and I am sad to admit it, Stoke look stronger. Hughes seem to be motivating them to work really hard in every game, while some of ours are already in 3rd gear. Sam needs to kick a few backsides (ie. Downing) and threaten to drop them in the reserves - unacceptable. Looking at Burnley game and quite relieved that 2 of their players have been booked (we had 3 booked) so looks like we are still top of Fair Play League.
Last edited by Humbug on Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Claretdave
Harry's estranged lovechild
Posts: 25630
Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 1:43 pm
Location: Congratulations you have just met the LME (Liberal Metropolitan Elite).

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by Claretdave »

That was ****.
User avatar
Whufc06
Posts: 10040
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 5:46 pm
Location: Upminster
Has liked: 122 likes
Total likes: 373 likes

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by Whufc06 »

Radical idea I know but maybe we'd hold the ball better further up the pitch if more of our ****ing players were up there??
User avatar
the pink palermo
Huge noggin
Posts: 45155
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: The Notorious Gate B @LS
Has liked: 813 likes
Total likes: 3033 likes

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by the pink palermo »

Awful game . Worse result . Out muscled out fought out thought .
User avatar
BondsoBob
Posts: 6992
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: Folkestone, Kent,
Has liked: 583 likes
Total likes: 530 likes

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by BondsoBob »

The only mitigating feature I can find is that we didn't lose. Which I fully expected to do.
Karlos
Posts: 148
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 3:22 pm

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by Karlos »

sullivan's lad isn't holding back his thoughts on why we were useless today:

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Kludgehammer
Posts: 9570
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 12:33 pm
Has liked: 178 likes
Total likes: 203 likes

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by Kludgehammer »

Heading back now. The good: Creswell's free kick. Some witty chanting. Spurs losing
The bad: holy crap what a sack of **** we were. If stoke had any kind of attack we'd have been slaughtered. Bad sub taking Song off - they had masses of space afterwards. Noble my god, delays and delays and delays and gives the pass when it's either the wrong pass or the right pass far too late. Hoofing the ball up front over and over again - I don't think we won the ball once the entire game. 2 shots on target all game, 1 of them a free kick. That ****ing arse of a ref. Our complete inabilty to mark or track players - repeatedly losr Stoke players in front of the box. The huge gap between attack and midfield

Did i mention that we were ****ing awful?
Last edited by Kludgehammer on Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
BondsoBob
Posts: 6992
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: Folkestone, Kent,
Has liked: 583 likes
Total likes: 530 likes

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by BondsoBob »

Karlos wrote:sullivan's lad isn't holding back his thoughts on why we were useless today:

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Some of that's a bit strong isn't it.
User avatar
vapourtrail
Posts: 850
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:02 pm
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by vapourtrail »

Karlos wrote:sullivan's lad isn't holding back his thoughts on why we were useless today:

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Truely unprofessional.
User avatar
kaybee15
Posts: 2566
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 9:06 pm
Location: And I ask again - only slightly louder - HOW?
Contact:

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by kaybee15 »

Puff Daddy wrote:Thought Carlton was unbelievably poor when he came on. Did absolutely the sum of nothing and also cost us the game
Oh give it a rest FFS. Cost us the game? Have a word with yourself.
User avatar
Iron Mark
Posts: 1664
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:31 pm
Location: Hertfordshire
Has liked: 3 likes
Total likes: 8 likes

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by Iron Mark »

vapourtrail wrote:Truely unprofessional.
Why does a 12(?) year old kid need to be professional?
User avatar
Puff Daddy
Gone for a Burton
Posts: 42461
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:08 pm
Location: Westham Way
Has liked: 258 likes
Total likes: 1161 likes

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by Puff Daddy »

kaybee15 wrote:

Oh give it a rest FFS. Cost us the game? Have a word with yourself.
On 90 minutes plus 4.5, all he had to do was control a ball played up to him wide right and keep it for around 10 seconds, but he couldn't, the ball was stolen off him, they broke down the right and you know the rest
User avatar
vapourtrail
Posts: 850
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:02 pm
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by vapourtrail »

Iron Mark wrote: Why does a 12(?) year old kid need to be professional?
It's one part of the toxic environment. Not very good in this kind of situation.
User avatar
il_martello_di_genovesi
Posts: 16900
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:11 pm
Location: genova è solo blucerchiata.
Has liked: 688 likes
Total likes: 2035 likes

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by il_martello_di_genovesi »

That was shocking.

Stoke weren't great and they deserved to win.

Today was the first time ever I was at a West Ham game and wanted to f*** off home...yet still didn't and was rewarded by another late conceded goal :lol:.

Feel really disappointed. Be glad when the season ends.
User avatar
smuts
Posts: 33946
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:28 am
Location: East, East, East London
Has liked: 1536 likes
Total likes: 1495 likes

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by smuts »

PrinceH wrote: Downing is a shadow of what he was earlier, played in the middle.
Sadly Downing's September to early December spell looks like a purple patch and he's back to his normal form of the last 5 or so years.
User avatar
kenthammer1984
Posts: 5331
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 5:21 pm
Has liked: 23 likes
Total likes: 86 likes

Re: West Ham United v Stoke City: Match Thread.

Post by kenthammer1984 »

richard99cook wrote:All the Allardyce fanboys seem to have gone quiet...
:clap: I'm still here.

Stick.
Post Reply