Late David Gold, Sullivan and Brady
Moderators: Gnome, last.caress, Wilko1304, Rio, bristolhammerfc, the pink palermo, chalks
- sicknote
- Plumbing the depths
- Posts: 30684
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 9:34 pm
- Has liked: 99 likes
- Total likes: 154 likes
- Contact:
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
Sacked manager replacements
West bromwich albion - Pardew 2 and a half year contract
Everton - Allardyce 18 month contract
Crystal Palace - Hodgson 2 year contract
Leicester city - Puel 3 year contract
West Ham United - Moyes 6 month contract
To me that shows 4 clubs with direction a plan and ambition and trust in their replacement manager
And one club, just filling the hot seat no plan , no long term strategy and little outlay,
Once again just the cheapest option from our owners
West bromwich albion - Pardew 2 and a half year contract
Everton - Allardyce 18 month contract
Crystal Palace - Hodgson 2 year contract
Leicester city - Puel 3 year contract
West Ham United - Moyes 6 month contract
To me that shows 4 clubs with direction a plan and ambition and trust in their replacement manager
And one club, just filling the hot seat no plan , no long term strategy and little outlay,
Once again just the cheapest option from our owners
- Diogenes
- Posts: 5051
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 5:07 pm
- Has liked: 432 likes
- Total likes: 1144 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
That's a very good point. I can understand the desire of many for change, but the who seems as worrying. Ask Birmingham supporters. In a perfect world we would be owned by honest philanthropic multi billionaires but it seems to me that most of todays owners (or potential owner)s are entirely the opposite. You only have to look at our last Managerial change. Does it fill you with confidence? Remember that our current owners are also the people who would decide the new owners.fjthegrey wrote:Sell to who?
Why would anyone buy us right now? Those ***** would demand a kings ransom for an asset that will substantially depreciate after our inevitable relegation.
They'll likely buy some players in January. Moyes will actually get a budget if we're still in the bottom 3 when the window opens.
That is the best case scenario in my eyes.
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
Sullivan blames Spurs for London Stadium layout. Any truth to this or lies as per usual?
- Westferry Iron
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 12:16 am
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
@sicknote. That's very telling. It is just conceivable these nutters actually expect we're going to get relegated. Keeping their options open. By next May they'll be lucky to find anyone half decent to do the job and if Moyes isn't dumped, he'll walk. They will then find some other cheapskate to guide us down to Div 1. They're poison with no antidote in sight.
Unless there's a massive injection of transfer cash in January, I guarantee that is their plan.
Unless there's a massive injection of transfer cash in January, I guarantee that is their plan.
- ballantine
- Posts: 1934
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 9:02 am
- Has liked: 1254 likes
- Total likes: 229 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
This.sicknote wrote:Sacked manager replacements
West bromwich albion - Pardew 2 and a half year contract
Everton - Allardyce 18 month contract
Crystal Palace - Hodgson 2 year contract
Leicester city - Puel 3 year contract
West Ham United - Moyes 6 month contract
To me that shows 4 clubs with direction a plan and ambition and trust in their replacement manager
And one club, just filling the hot seat no plan , no long term strategy and little outlay,
I didn't want Moyes. I don't like him. I think he'll take us down. Still, I think the board should have given him at least a three years contract, when they decided he was the best manager possible for our club. If the owners don't have faith in him and tells the world he's quickly amd easily replacable - why would the players respect him?
(Yes, I know he's on 10K a week, and that is my point - either pay what it costs to run a PL club (which you won't) or f*** off and make space for someone who will (which you won't, you lying, leeching 7% scum)
- sicknote
- Plumbing the depths
- Posts: 30684
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 9:34 pm
- Has liked: 99 likes
- Total likes: 154 likes
- Contact:
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
Thekorean wrote:Sullivan blames Spurs for London Stadium layout. Any truth to this or lies as per usual?
Its cobblers
Blaming spurs or using spurs as a smokescreen all through the OS dealings has been the go to statement for our owners, initially it was "we have to move there as we can't let spurs move into our manor", it still is used by them when drawn on the stadium being ours
Id rather spurs had that ****hole, but they never wanted it, the whole thing was leverage on the government to get more funding for the surrounding areas of the Lane as the local council were trying to force huge costs onto the new development
The seating, could never go on the track, at no ground in the world can you put seating on the track , it will damage it, they kept saying they would, a lot of us kept saying you cant as the athletes will end up falling down dents in the track, but the lies were believed
The fault on the layout is from day one not wanting football there, so no planning was done for that, the only planning for after was to leave the lower tier and the track for athletics, that was it
It was only years after they sought a wayout of that and our owners scrambled to get it, theyd enquired with Birmingham city council if they got the commonwealth games to use that new stadium had they got it but didnt, and looked at cardiff city possibly playing at the millenium, it was a given before they bought the club they were going for the OS
The layout is what they lauded in their artistic impressions, all their pr visits before we moved in and all the last 18 months of us being there, how and why is it now spurs fault, its just a cheap shot at our intelligence thinking oh f*** its that nasty spurs lot again, and no flak going on the rightful owners of our club for accepting and overseeing such a shoddy piss poor stadium refurb and deal
-
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:46 pm
- Location: in the away end...
- Has liked: 10 likes
- Total likes: 66 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
David Gold retweeted this:
Tiddy @NeilTidd1969
Replying to @rcumber1 @E6Jack and
I also believe and I will say again HAD LEVY & HEARN not tried to hijack the bid and destroy our credibility etc we would have a significantly different layout .. our fans seem to forget this
9:53 am - 26 Nov 2017
It comes from here but as with any retweet it doesn't really explain what Gold is endorsing.
Tiddy @NeilTidd1969
Replying to @rcumber1 @E6Jack and
I also believe and I will say again HAD LEVY & HEARN not tried to hijack the bid and destroy our credibility etc we would have a significantly different layout .. our fans seem to forget this
9:53 am - 26 Nov 2017
It comes from here but as with any retweet it doesn't really explain what Gold is endorsing.
- DaveWHU1964
- Posts: 14873
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:14 am
- Has liked: 1302 likes
- Total likes: 679 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
That’s just a desperate, desperate, pathetic argument. Even apologists have run out of anything remotely positive to say in favour of these parasites staying put. It’s now come down to their judgement is so crap they’d sell us to an wrong ‘un.Diogenes wrote: Remember that our current owners are also the people who would decide the new owners.
- sicknote
- Plumbing the depths
- Posts: 30684
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 9:34 pm
- Has liked: 99 likes
- Total likes: 154 likes
- Contact:
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
2 years earlier when your club and orient were well out of it, our owners put out this statement, (i don't go on pravda whufc.com, so the poxy mirror article will have to do)Modern wrote:David Gold retweeted this:
Tiddy @NeilTidd1969
Replying to @rcumber1 @E6Jack and
I also believe and I will say again HAD LEVY & HEARN not tried to hijack the bid and destroy our credibility etc we would have a significantly different layout .. our fans seem to forget this
9:53 am - 26 Nov 2017
It comes from here but as with any retweet it doesn't really explain what Gold is endorsing.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... en-5000423" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Its all on them accepting and delivering the shambles we now have as a home, no one elses fault
- sicknote
- Plumbing the depths
- Posts: 30684
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 9:34 pm
- Has liked: 99 likes
- Total likes: 154 likes
- Contact:
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
And another one in 2016
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... video.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Again all upbeat and proud of this shiny new gaff, yet now its someone elses fault
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... video.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Again all upbeat and proud of this shiny new gaff, yet now its someone elses fault
- noblecause
- Posts: 1198
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:14 am
- Location: Stuck in a tunnel on the Hammersmith & City line
- Hello there!
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
They possess a truly remarkable combination of incredible incompetence and unconscionable dishonesty.
At every turn they continue to demonstrate a spectacular mixture of crass stupidity and loathsome ineptitude that is quite stupefying to behold.
At every turn they continue to demonstrate a spectacular mixture of crass stupidity and loathsome ineptitude that is quite stupefying to behold.
-
- Posts: 10613
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:11 pm
- Has liked: 1556 likes
- Total likes: 773 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
David Gold either has cognitive issues or is a devious individual or both to try and mug the West Ham supporters in such a pathetic manner. Does he think we were all born yesterday?
The silly old fool needs to shut the eff up and get off twitter.
The silly old fool needs to shut the eff up and get off twitter.
Last edited by Up the Junction on Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Edited by moderator.
Reason: Edited by moderator.
- noblecause
- Posts: 1198
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 12:14 am
- Location: Stuck in a tunnel on the Hammersmith & City line
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
That's what I said!! :lol:Hello there! wrote:They possess a truly remarkable combination of incredible incompetence and unconscionable dishonesty.
At every turn they continue to demonstrate a spectacular mixture of crass stupidity and loathsome ineptitude that is quite stupefying to behold.
- RichieRiv
- Posts: 20858
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 2:35 pm
- Location: https://www.hireahero.org.uk/
- Has liked: 307 likes
- Total likes: 802 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
Because West Ham hates Spurs is an easy tactic to use to get fans on side.
The whole Spurs moving into the OS was a collaboration to ensure that West Ham fans supported to move i.e. we don't care that it's an athletics stadium we just don't want spurs to have. The upside was spurs put a shot across Haringey's bows in order to get planning permission.
They played us.
The whole Spurs moving into the OS was a collaboration to ensure that West Ham fans supported to move i.e. we don't care that it's an athletics stadium we just don't want spurs to have. The upside was spurs put a shot across Haringey's bows in order to get planning permission.
They played us.
- eddiecurry
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 9:14 am
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
Getting new owners didn't work out well for Leyton Orient. You can still find a story dating from just 2014 headlined "West Ham should be 'petrified' of Leyton Orient under new owner Francesco Becchetti, says Barry Hearn"Diogenes wrote:Remember that our current owners are also the people who would decide the new owners.
The fact that G&S have kept us in the PL for MOST of their time shows that they're not actually the worst owners we could have had.
I would still like new owners though.
- simonirons
- Posts: 6937
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 2:51 pm
- Location: Grandads a liar
- Has liked: 372 likes
- Total likes: 159 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
Gold can defend the stadium all he like but the truth his, he has a monitor in front of him at home games because his views terrible.
- Puff Daddy
- Gone for a Burton
- Posts: 42250
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:08 pm
- Location: Westham Way
- Has liked: 248 likes
- Total likes: 1160 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
No. There will always be a desperado out there somewhere who'll give it a go. Paolo Di Canio for oneWestferry Iron wrote:@sicknote. That's very telling. It is just conceivable these nutters actually expect we're going to get relegated. Keeping their options open. By next May they'll be lucky to find anyone half decent to do the job and if Moyes isn't dumped, he'll walk. They will then find some other cheapskate to guide us down to Div 1. They're poison with no antidote in sight.
Unless there's a massive injection of transfer cash in January, I guarantee that is their plan.
-
- Posts: 15815
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 9:01 pm
- Has liked: 25 likes
- Total likes: 744 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
now that we are doomed and down I think its time to turn the heat up and start protesting against these 7% leeches. we are about to announce record profits of 80m will it pay off the debt, pay off gold and sullivans loans or go towards new players ?
the loans will be in place until they leave as its a nice earner. no chance of decent players just scraps.
BOARD OUT portests at every game now. we have back the team and the response has been nil. time to remove the cancer within the club. make it unpleasant for them. get them thinking of selling.
business men will smell a chance if they see how bad it is for gold and Sullivan.
RED BULL to the rescue ?
the loans will be in place until they leave as its a nice earner. no chance of decent players just scraps.
BOARD OUT portests at every game now. we have back the team and the response has been nil. time to remove the cancer within the club. make it unpleasant for them. get them thinking of selling.
business men will smell a chance if they see how bad it is for gold and Sullivan.
RED BULL to the rescue ?
- prophet:marginal
- Posts: 43570
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 8:54 pm
- Location: Engels l;vin, necessary pence
- Has liked: 838 likes
- Total likes: 1982 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
It may have been full of bitterness and hatred, but thanks, anyway, that comment made me laugh out loud.Modern wrote:David Gold retweeted this:
Tiddy @NeilTidd1969
Replying to @rcumber1 @E6Jack and
I also believe and I will say again HAD LEVY & HEARN not tried to hijack the bid and destroy our credibility etc we would have a significantly different layout .. our fans seem to forget this
9:53 am - 26 Nov 2017
It comes from here but as with any retweet it doesn't really explain what Gold is endorsing.
So, its Levy and Hearn's fault! Of course, it is.