Roberto Jimenez

Does exactly what it says on the tin - the forum for football-related discussion.

Moderators: chalks, the pink palermo, -DL-, Gnome, Rio, bristolhammerfc

Post Reply
User avatar
e17
Posts: 12634
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Deep deep down

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by e17 » Sun Nov 10, 2019 10:36 am

Well it’s a shame they were obviously less desperate than us then

User avatar
thejackhammer
Posts: 8495
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 11:49 pm

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by thejackhammer » Sun Nov 10, 2019 10:40 am

e17 wrote:
Sun Nov 10, 2019 10:36 am
Well it’s a shame they were obviously less desperate than us then
They signed a free agent goalkeeper just before the start of the season.

It's worth bearing in mind that no one else was interested in Adrian. He'd look just as bad as Roberto behind our defence.

User avatar
e17
Posts: 12634
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Deep deep down

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by e17 » Sun Nov 10, 2019 10:45 am

Jack, I don’t remember him ever looking THIS bad behind our defence.

I don’t even think he was that brilliant - but this fella is next levels of Macknight

User avatar
Graza
Posts: 2181
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 10:18 pm

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by Graza » Sun Nov 10, 2019 12:20 pm

Monkeybubbles wrote:
Sat Nov 09, 2019 5:29 pm
Image
Sign him up. He's no worse than Roberto and would play for milk money...

User avatar
Burnley Hammer
Posts: 6968
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:19 pm
Location: was Colne, Burnley, Hull, Colchester, Norwich, Derby.... Now Nottingham
Contact:

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by Burnley Hammer » Sun Nov 10, 2019 12:53 pm

Ex has made the claim that Roberto was actually our first choice ahead of Fabianski and we only signed fabianski because we couldn't complete the deal for Roberto.

User avatar
Marky
Posts: 12224
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:27 pm
Location: Sullivan has killed this club

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by Marky » Sun Nov 10, 2019 1:00 pm

Burnley Hammer wrote:
Sun Nov 10, 2019 12:53 pm
Ex has made the claim that Roberto was actually our first choice ahead of Fabianski and we only signed fabianski because we couldn't complete the deal for Roberto.
If that’s true then whoever thought that needs to be fired.

User avatar
Doc H Ball
Posts: 10036
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:29 pm
Location: in nick

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by Doc H Ball » Sun Nov 10, 2019 1:22 pm

Ex also claiming Rogers was first choice before we appointed Manuel. He’s been let loose.

The cabal of ****ers on the Club payroll pisses me off far more than the players and managers.

User avatar
Phil S
Posts: 5271
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 2:57 pm

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by Phil S » Sun Nov 10, 2019 1:29 pm

Doc H Ball wrote:
Sat Nov 09, 2019 10:47 pm
It was sad mate. If they can't sing about who is really at fault then screw them.

Good to see you and your son earlier. I still enjoy meeting up and trying to have a giggle, so **** the rest of it.
good to see you too Doc...

at least the A1/M was open on the way back

User avatar
Diogenes
Posts: 1288
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 5:07 pm

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by Diogenes » Sun Nov 10, 2019 1:36 pm

Phil S wrote:
Sun Nov 10, 2019 1:29 pm
good to see you too Doc...

at least the A1/M was open on the way back
I tend not to let things like this get to me Doc, but it does follow a usual pattern for good or ill. If I was Pellegrini I would be be getting the Saga Cruises brochure out and looking at long winter breaks.

User avatar
Graza
Posts: 2181
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 10:18 pm

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by Graza » Sun Nov 10, 2019 2:15 pm

Burnley Hammer wrote:
Sun Nov 10, 2019 12:53 pm
Ex has made the claim that Roberto was actually our first choice ahead of Fabianski and we only signed fabianski because we couldn't complete the deal for Roberto.
Board sponsored trolls are well and truly off the leash then.

User avatar
westham,eggyandchips
Posts: 15590
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: Homeward Bound

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by westham,eggyandchips » Thu Nov 14, 2019 6:14 pm

I wonder how Ginge would have faired between the sticks. I reckon he would have been pretty good.

User avatar
Coops
Posts: 5217
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Rayleigh, Essex

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by Coops » Fri Nov 15, 2019 5:13 pm

Does anybody know when Fab is due back?

User avatar
Cuenca 'ammer
ex 'ouston 'ammer
Posts: 33821
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 4:19 pm
Location: Journey to the dead of night. High on a hill in Eldorado

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by Cuenca 'ammer » Fri Nov 15, 2019 5:22 pm

physioroom I am pretty sure had him at 28/12

User avatar
Coops
Posts: 5217
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Rayleigh, Essex

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by Coops » Fri Nov 15, 2019 5:32 pm

We will probably be in the bottom 3 by then.

User avatar
Cuenca 'ammer
ex 'ouston 'ammer
Posts: 33821
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 4:19 pm
Location: Journey to the dead of night. High on a hill in Eldorado

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by Cuenca 'ammer » Fri Nov 15, 2019 5:46 pm

Coops wrote:
Fri Nov 15, 2019 5:32 pm
We will probably be in the bottom 3 by then.
we might well be in the bottom one !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


:lol:

User avatar
Universidad-de-Chile
Posts: 1541
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 12:45 am
Location: "(We, the small people, protest) Untill DIGNITY becomes custom" (Chile)

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by Universidad-de-Chile » Fri Nov 15, 2019 6:04 pm

Doc H Ball wrote:
Sun Nov 10, 2019 1:22 pm
Ex also claiming Rogers was first choice before we appointed Manuel. He’s been let loose.

The cabal of ****ers on the Club payroll pisses me off far more than the players and managers.
+ 1

User avatar
GaryP
Posts: 12448
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Broken Britain

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by GaryP » Fri Nov 15, 2019 6:32 pm

Doc H Ball wrote:
Sun Nov 10, 2019 1:22 pm
Ex also claiming Rogers was first choice before we appointed Manuel. He’s been let loose.

The cabal of ****ers on the Club payroll pisses me off far more than the players and managers.
Posionous ****ers. Him and those two sycophantic arsewipes who run that abortion of a site are the worst two, but he has plenty of others.

User avatar
rciron
Posts: 3354
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 9:32 am
Location: Chicken Run

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by rciron » Fri Nov 15, 2019 9:17 pm

Burnley Hammer wrote:
Sun Nov 10, 2019 12:53 pm
Ex ha made the claim that Roberto was actually our first choice ahead of Fabianski and we only signed fabianski because we couldn't complete the deal for Roberto.
:shock:

User avatar
chigwells finest
Posts: 9727
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 12:11 pm
Location: desperately seeking redemption from this west ham misery

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by chigwells finest » Fri Nov 15, 2019 9:43 pm

Burnley Hammer wrote:
Sun Nov 10, 2019 12:53 pm
Ex has made the claim that Roberto was actually our first choice ahead of Fabianski and we only signed fabianski because we couldn't complete the deal for Roberto.

we couldve been relegated a year earlier then

User avatar
Graza
Posts: 2181
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 10:18 pm

Re: Roberto Jimenez

Post by Graza » Sat Nov 16, 2019 11:06 am

chigwells finest wrote:
Fri Nov 15, 2019 9:43 pm
we couldve been relegated a year earlier then
In fairness Adrian would simply have displaced him after half a season as he did Hart

Post Reply