hammerman11 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2019 1:55 pm
noble was too far forward against palace leaving lanzini at the back. lanzini played well upfront with arnie a season ago so could do the same with haller. noble needs to switch with lanzini and let the younger faster more skilful player lead attacks.
noble also cant get back when moves break down so we are then light in the middle.
Spot on Hammerman 11
Noble has never had the energy to close down or play as an attacking midfield and is a lot more effective as the "quarter back". When he does venture up the field, it does leave the gaps that Palace and Bournemouth manage to find and its even more important that he holds his position if we have both Arthur and Fred as wing backs (both more attacking than natural defenders like Cresswell,who also needs to hold his position when up against fast wingers).
Yes, there might be the odd occasion where he has stayed up after an attack, which is ok if someone drops into his position, but you would rather have him back in the centre, pulling the strings, than the images of him up top. The problem is, Lanzini should not be dropping back as he can't defend for toffee and if we do win the ball back after pressing, i rather have Lanzini/Fornals taking someone on than Noble.
In the main, he is collecting the ball and retaining it, passing to the full backs, collecting it back and looking for the runs up top...
Fornals has the legs to chase down, but not the experience/leadership and range of passing that Noble produces..
My worry is, that when we play teams like Palace and Bournemouth, we are throwing points away after gaining the lead. Noble needs to hold it with Rice or we need another enforcer next to Rice to see the game out. Again, this isn't a position that Fornals can do and should be a priority next summer.