:lol:
“Champions League winner and FIFA world manager of the year Roberto has had the last laugh following a tough start to his West Ham career...”
Moderator: Gnome
:lol:
Exactly this. He's also a realistic appointment, unlike Howe who is local to Bournemouth and is a very nice area etc.Peaches wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 1:41 pm I’d take Dyche in. Heartbeat, he has more character, fight and minerals than everyone in our organization combined. As others have said he’s a bit more progressive Allardyce, but his teams are absolutely absolutely no less entertaining than Rafa’s or Moyes or even Danny Cowley’s. The players wouldn’t get away with any laziness, weakness premadonna nonsense, he’d actually make us hard to play against and with the players at his disposal, I’m sure he wouldn’t just employ route one. He’d get the best out of Haller and raise the fight and fitness levels up by orders of magnitude.
Me too. The big problem with West Ham fans is they demand a Fancy-Dan manager who will play 'entertaining' football, then moan when it all goes pear-shaped and we get turned over by all and sundry. Think of our last six managers (excluding Grant, a completely wrong choice from the outset); Curbishley, solid and steady, saved us from disaster but never liked by the fans so he had to go. Enter Zola, universally loved, more expansive football, one decent season then we were rubbish. Allardyce, righted the ship, made us hard to beat, had some awkward moments but was beginning to build something, rightly questioned the whole 'West Ham Way' nonsense and was consequently hated by the fans so he had to go. In comes Bilic, even more universally loved, one great season blessed with the genius of Payet then we were rubbish again. Bring in Moyes to do a rescue job like Curbishley, again some awkward moments but beginning to build something;once more the fans didn't like his style of play so no, he had to go as well. Get in Pellegrini with promises of more expansive play, buys some crowd-pleasing talents, has a decent first season then.....see the pattern here? I want us to be hard to beat, not every failing team's patsy, every useless opposition striker's easy meat, I'm sick of the unrealistic expectations our fans burden the Board and manager with; how is it that Haller has won more aerial challenges than any other player in the PL this season yet has neither scored with his head nor created a chance for someone else with his head? If he played at Burnley he'd have 10 goals at least by now.Peaches wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 1:41 pm I’d take Dyche in. Heartbeat, he has more character, fight and minerals than everyone in our organization combined. As others have said he’s a bit more progressive Allardyce, but his teams are absolutely absolutely no less entertaining than Rafa’s or Moyes or even Danny Cowley’s. The players wouldn’t get away with any laziness, weakness premadonna nonsense, he’d actually make us hard to play against and with the players at his disposal, I’m sure he wouldn’t just employ route one. He’d get the best out of Haller and raise the fight and fitness levels up by orders of magnitude.
If we got Dyche in for Chelsea, we’d win, and I’d fancy us to win at least 3 of our next 4 matches.
I’ve not seen one fellow supporter who actually wants Rafar99c wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 2:31 pm ^And the other problem is delusion. Some people calling for Benitez who played absolutely **** football at Newcastle and pretty **** football when he was managing good clubs, winning but boring, but then they ask for Rafa over fresh up and coming options. DESPITE Benitez being in the same position as Pellegrini, success, deterioration and then ****ing off to China for $$$. Would be an awful appointment.
They've scored 2 more this season than both Arsenal and Wolves, 4 more than Man Utd, and qualified for Europe a couple of years ago with a **** budget playing some good football, plus if they don't perform he would let the players know about it, who would you suggest instead?
To be fair this is probably right, it's the owners that need to f*** off.steveyrockstar wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 2:38 pm whoever we get, we'll be in an identical situation in 2 years' time.
Not to mention they’ve scored 4 more than us.r99c wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 2:37 pm They've scored 2 more this season than both Arsenal and Wolves, 4 more than Man Utd, and qualified for Europe a couple of years ago with a **** budget playing some good football, plus if they don't perform he would let the players know about it, who would you suggest instead?
Absof*ckinglutley!steveyrockstar wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 2:38 pm whoever we get, we'll be in an identical situation in 2 years' time.
Can’t believe the day has come....Puff Daddy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 2:40 pm If Hughton and Dyche are the only candidates in the frame, I think I would prefer we keep with Pellers until the end of the season, even if it means we dont collect another single, solitary point before the end of the campaign. If we go down, we go down; what the **** does it matter whether we go down on 13 points, or 33 ? If these are the straight choice, then we might just as well re-appoint Roeder and give him another chance to show what he can do :lol:
Honestly mate, I haven’t got a ****ing scoobyr99c wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 2:37 pm They've scored 2 more this season than both Arsenal and Wolves, 4 more than Man Utd, and qualified for Europe a couple of years ago with a **** budget playing some good football, plus if they don't perform he would let the players know about it, who would you suggest instead?