Chelsea vs West Ham United: match thread

The Forum for all football-related discussion, including West Ham United FC. Our busiest Forum and the place to begin if you're new to KUMB.

Moderators: Gnome, last.caress, Wilko1304, Rio, bristolhammerfc, the pink palermo, chalks

Post Reply
User avatar
Sloop John B
The voice of reason
Posts: 7771
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 1:02 pm
Location: On the High Seas
Has liked: 319 likes
Total likes: 647 likes

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham United: match thread

Post by Sloop John B »

Rasp wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2025 9:37 pm We all know now that it is a straight loan with no option to buy but we still do not know what Jinxed meant by his Options post entails.

My apologies to everyone to keep on about this but it was a proper bashing, hope you all had fun.
Jinxed post was prefaced by the word confused so it seemed he was baffled by what he heard and was just passing it on...there was no grandstanding no peacocking just straight up passing on info... I'm always happy to hear that even if it turns out not to he true ...he's no need to explain himself.

Also...folk were adamant that there was no recall in the JWP loan and look where we are...
Crouchend_Hammer
Posts: 29522
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:31 am
Location: Forest Gate
Has liked: 182 likes
Total likes: 3279 likes

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham United: match thread

Post by Crouchend_Hammer »

Sloop John B wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 7:37 am Jinxed post was prefaced by the word confused so it seemed he was baffled by what he heard and was just passing it on...there was no grandstanding no peacocking just straight up passing on info... I'm always happy to hear that even if it turns out not to he true ...he's no need to explain himself.

Also...folk were adamant that there was no recall in the JWP loan and look where we are...
There wasn't a recall in the JWP loan. If Forest had wanted to keep him there was nothing we could have done.
They agreed to terminate the loan deal
User avatar
Sloop John B
The voice of reason
Posts: 7771
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 1:02 pm
Location: On the High Seas
Has liked: 319 likes
Total likes: 647 likes

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham United: match thread

Post by Sloop John B »

Crouchend_Hammer wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2025 7:41 am There wasn't a recall in the JWP loan. If Forest had wanted to keep him there was nothing we could have done.
They agreed to terminate the loan deal
...the point is that there's always a way to do a deal if it appeals to both sides whether it's predetermined or not.
User avatar
Eggs'n'nuts
Posts: 4918
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 5:10 pm
Location: Swimming in a glass half full.
Has liked: 246 likes
Total likes: 474 likes

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham United: match thread

Post by Eggs'n'nuts »

Ironing Board wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2025 3:29 pm I don’t think the ball did touch him. The flight didn’t change, which is probably why it stood.
However, if it had been the other way round, I'm sure they would have found contact somewhere.
User avatar
alf git
Posts: 12242
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 7:49 pm
Location: On the beaver slide.
Has liked: 1 like
Total likes: 2483 likes

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham United: match thread

Post by alf git »

Crouchend_Hammer wrote: Wed Feb 05, 2025 2:40 pm

as Diogenes said yesterday, the protocol as it stands is arbitary so Dermot Gallagher is just using his interpretation of what is too long

If you're Dermot Gallagher's wife then 24 seconds is probably far too long.
Post Reply