👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

The Forum for all football-related discussion, including West Ham United FC. Our busiest Forum and the place to begin if you're new to KUMB.

Moderators: Gnome, last.caress, Wilko1304, Rio, bristolhammerfc, the pink palermo, chalks

Post Reply
User avatar
Ozza
Posts: 33530
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 4:41 pm
Location: Here, there, every f****** where
Has liked: 2605 likes
Total likes: 4372 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by Ozza »

WCpete wrote: Fri Mar 21, 2025 5:11 pm Was Rodriguez a Steidten signing? Or a Lopetegui signing? Just heard Gonzo say on his YT channel that Guido was given a 100k/wk contract with us. If that's true then that alone is reason enough fire one or both.
Pretty well mentioned and by ITKs on here that he was JL’s along with Kilman and Soler
User avatar
EastVillageHammer
Posts: 4236
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 10:31 am
Has liked: 8216 likes
Total likes: 4638 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by EastVillageHammer »

We’ll never know for sure, all we can say definitively is the coalition wasn’t a particularly effective one.
User avatar
Albie Beck
Posts: 11037
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:42 am
Has liked: 1094 likes
Total likes: 1120 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by Albie Beck »

mushy wrote: Fri Mar 21, 2025 10:46 am Although Brighton and Hove Albion appear to be the exception that prove the rule?
Brentford too. But they both have a more scientific approach although it remains to be seen if that works in the really long term.
User avatar
Albie Beck
Posts: 11037
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:42 am
Has liked: 1094 likes
Total likes: 1120 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by Albie Beck »

WCpete wrote: Fri Mar 21, 2025 5:11 pm Was Rodriguez a Steidten signing? Or a Lopetegui signing? Just heard Gonzo say on his YT channel that Guido was given a 100k/wk contract with us. If that's true then that alone is reason enough fire one or both.
I thought it was the Dwarf and the Duchess who negotiated the contracts, with input from sundry tame agents.
User avatar
Ironing Board
Posts: 26470
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:11 am
Has liked: 2599 likes
Total likes: 2238 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by Ironing Board »

EastVillageHammer wrote: Fri Mar 21, 2025 8:36 pm We’ll never know for sure, all we can say definitively is the coalition wasn’t a particularly effective one.
The worst coalition since Cameron-Clegg! :crylol:
User avatar
MB
Cricket's Darren Anderton
Posts: 28862
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:13 pm
Has liked: 8311 likes
Total likes: 5063 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by MB »

Albie Beck wrote: Fri Mar 21, 2025 9:06 pm I thought it was the Dwarf and the Duchess who negotiated the contracts, with input from sundry tame agents.
Ultimately they are the money people, but we’ve had a “committee” doing the picking for a while. How that works and what weight various people have/had is the unknown.
User avatar
MB
Cricket's Darren Anderton
Posts: 28862
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:13 pm
Has liked: 8311 likes
Total likes: 5063 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by MB »

Albie Beck wrote: Fri Mar 21, 2025 9:03 pm Brentford too. But they both have a more scientific approach although it remains to be seen if that works in the really long term.
Works is also relative. It is a great approach if you are looking for higher mid table, but when the big boys can, and do, poach your best players then you are in a constant building phase.

You also need a fan base with the patience to blood these young foreign players which is much easier at Brentford, Brighton, Bournemouth and Fulham than it is here.

We are a tweeny club. Not big enough to buy the finished product, but probably too big (at least in the eyes of a lump of the fan base) to “do a Brighton”. The answer is probably a bit out of pot A and a bit out of pot B, but eventually you are fishing in the same pool as clubs with two, three and even four times the revenue. You then settle or you “dither”
User avatar
EastVillageHammer
Posts: 4236
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 10:31 am
Has liked: 8216 likes
Total likes: 4638 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by EastVillageHammer »

MB wrote: Sat Mar 22, 2025 8:56 am
You then settle or you “dither”
It works until it doesn’t. Sometimes you land a Kudus or a Paqueta and everyone sits back and thinks “why didn’t he go to City/Liverpool etc.

Other times we sign no one, or a Mavrapanos rather than Maguire, who you really wanted and were waiting on.
User avatar
MB
Cricket's Darren Anderton
Posts: 28862
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:13 pm
Has liked: 8311 likes
Total likes: 5063 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by MB »

EastVillageHammer wrote: Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:10 am It works until it doesn’t. Sometimes you land a Kudus or a Paqueta and everyone sits back and thinks “why didn’t he go to City/Liverpool etc.
Did they? Some on here maybe, but that is the hype train talking mate.

Kudus had been linked to “The Big Six” for at least 12 months before he signed for us which suggests they were looking and had passed (ironically).

Paqueta had one big flop on his track record so I doubt he was on many radars when we signed him. Payet like in that not quite young enough, is he good enough type way. Who knows how real the links to Man City were. Diop was going for £50m to Man Utd once upon a time…

If they were in that big six pool then it was caught in the shallows where we could scoop them up!

Good players both of course but not quite what we needed/not quite it for what we bought them for. Story of our transfer business once we go over £30m.
User avatar
DusseldorfHammer
Posts: 10281
Joined: Sun May 30, 2021 8:34 am
Has liked: 4990 likes
Total likes: 5589 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by DusseldorfHammer »

On Brighton and Tony Bloom.

They're making extra money from selling their Scouting and Data Intel to other clubs. They have found a niche.
User avatar
EastVillageHammer
Posts: 4236
Joined: Wed May 15, 2019 10:31 am
Has liked: 8216 likes
Total likes: 4638 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by EastVillageHammer »

MB wrote: Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:42 am Did they? Some on here maybe, but that is the hype train talking mate.
I think the fact that both came quite late on in windows and then finally signed made people think that was a good way to do business. Bide your time and you’ll get a better quality of player once the big clubs have done their business.

In reality I think the best run clubs identify the players they want and that are feasibly in their bracket of players they can get and do business early.

I think as you’ve said, we kind of fall between the cracks as we’re big enough to outspend 60-70% of the league, and want to fish in that bigger pond, but can’t compete if Arsenal, City or Villa and Newcastle now and their foreign equivalents come in for those players we’ve gone for.

To my mind, we should be doing what Brighton or Brentford do, and leveraging the size of our club to do it bigger and better than them. But it takes vision, it’s long term, and it doesn’t involve using favoured agents of our owner.
Last edited by EastVillageHammer on Sat Mar 22, 2025 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
carnage
Posts: 23165
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2003 2:22 pm
Location: KFC
Has liked: 94 likes
Total likes: 902 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by carnage »

MB wrote: Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:42 am Did they? Some on here maybe, but that is the hype train talking mate.

Come on, Paqueta was Brazils number 8 when we signed him. And how to city was done before the betting story broke.
User avatar
Ironing Board
Posts: 26470
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:11 am
Has liked: 2599 likes
Total likes: 2238 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by Ironing Board »

DusseldorfHammer wrote: Sat Mar 22, 2025 11:08 am On Brighton and Tony Bloom.

They're making extra money from selling their Scouting and Data Intel to other clubs. They have found a niche.
Indeed, maybe Brighton is the promotional tool?
User avatar
MB
Cricket's Darren Anderton
Posts: 28862
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:13 pm
Has liked: 8311 likes
Total likes: 5063 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by MB »

carnage wrote: Sat Mar 22, 2025 2:45 pm Come on, Paqueta was Brazils number 8 when we signed him. And how to city was done before the betting story broke.
And who did we beat to his signature when we signed him? Exactly...

We also need to stop all this Brazil's this and Italy's that and Germany's the other. It is meaningless and lumbers you with players like Rodriguez.

The only papers on that deal were the news kind...
User avatar
Ironing Board
Posts: 26470
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:11 am
Has liked: 2599 likes
Total likes: 2238 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by Ironing Board »

MB wrote: Sat Mar 22, 2025 4:57 pm And who did we beat to his signature when we signed him? Exactly...

We also need to stop all this Brazil's this and Italy's that and Germany's the other. It is meaningless and lumbers you with players like Rodriguez.

The only papers on that deal were the news kind...
Part of the attraction of exotic internationals is the reflected glory of great players past. There was a time when people imagined every Brazilian had the skill of Pele. Ironically, Brazil football went down that path of trying to develop more robust, powerful players as it led to more success in their domestic league.

Scotland used to produce great forward players like Dalglish, Law, Archibald, etc, but who would want a Scottish number nine these days?
User avatar
Albie Beck
Posts: 11037
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:42 am
Has liked: 1094 likes
Total likes: 1120 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by Albie Beck »

MB wrote: Sat Mar 22, 2025 8:49 am Ultimately they are the money people, but we’ve had a “committee” doing the picking for a while. How that works and what weight various people have/had is the unknown.
The "committee" haggled with each other over the targets, but I thought it was Brady and co who actually hammered out the detailed terms with them. What a joyous experience that must be for a prospective signing and their representatives. No wonder we often struggle to get deals over the line.
User avatar
Ironing Board
Posts: 26470
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:11 am
Has liked: 2599 likes
Total likes: 2238 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by Ironing Board »

Albie Beck wrote: Sat Mar 22, 2025 8:20 pm The "committee" haggled with each other over the targets, but I thought it was Brady and co who actually hammered out the detailed terms with them. What a joyous experience that must be for a prospective signing and their representatives. No wonder we often struggle to get deals over the line.
I think most clubs these days have these sorts of committees though, in some form or another.
mattyD
Posts: 4077
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:25 pm
Has liked: 685 likes
Total likes: 588 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by mattyD »

Ironing Board wrote: Sat Mar 22, 2025 9:59 pm I think most clubs these days have these sorts of committees though, in some form or another.
How on earth then did our committee green light on Guido and c.£30m on Fulkrug?
User avatar
DublinDave
Posts: 8240
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2021 11:13 am
Location: Dublin
Has liked: 4111 likes
Total likes: 2782 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by DublinDave »

mattyD wrote: Sun Mar 23, 2025 10:29 am How on earth then did our committee green light on Guido and c.£30m on Fulkrug?
Because a committee is only as good as the sum of it's parts.
Lop, Steidten, Sully & Salty, not exactly the A team are they..?
User avatar
Ozza
Posts: 33530
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 4:41 pm
Location: Here, there, every f****** where
Has liked: 2605 likes
Total likes: 4372 likes

Re: 👋 Farewell Tim Steidten

Post by Ozza »

I mean i have absolutely no idea but it does feel like…

“Julen you get 3, Tim you get 3, i get a couple but if either of them fail, then Tim its on you…is everyone clear?”
Post Reply