Tommy Robinson jailed

[Ozza]

Any news from Tommy and his pals about the Glasgow peados being sentenced?

Nope, I thought... Tumbleweed.

I wonder why that is?????

was he connected to that bunch of scum WI?

[Kentish Hammer]

Any news from Tommy and his pals about the Glasgow peados being sentenced?

Nope, I thought... Tumbleweed.

I wonder why that is?????

Were that gang protected from arrest and prosecution at the expense of their victims?

If not why on earth would he be commenting on it?

[WHU Independent]

was he connected to that bunch of scum WI?

No, but I mentioned it as I understand that the demographic of the Scottish paedo's arrested don't conform to his preffered demographic of abusers.

They were not protected by the police that I know. They were a bumch of scottish junkies that ran a "monstrous" abuse network, that involved putting parts of a victim in a microwave. They run a "beastie house" that held "rape nights."

https://news.sky.com/story/glasgow-paed ... g-13041623

I thought that as this was such a high profile and horrific crime against children, that he or his supporters would have commented by now?

[Kentish Hammer]

No, but I mentioned it as I understand that the demographic of the Scottish paedo's arrested don't conform to his preffered demographic of abusers.

They were not protected by the police that I know. They were a bumch of scottish junkies that ran a "monstrous" abuse network, that involved putting parts of a victim in a microwave. They run a "beastie house" that held "rape nights."

https://news.sky.com/story/glasgow-paed ... g-13041623

I thought that as this was such a high profile and horrific crime against children, that he or his supporters would have commented by now?

I ask again, why would they?

Whatever you think of Robinson and his followers, the point they are making on this subject is that people were allowed to get away with their crimes, and that the victims suffered longer than necessary, because the skin colour and religion of the perpetrators meant those with the power to stop them failed to do so.

The fact that another group of scumbags to who this scenario doesn't apply to have been caught and punished is irrelevant. And the fact that Robinson and his followers are using the issue for their personal benefit is also irrelevant. Whether you like it or not the question they are asking is a valid one.

[Patsy Belgium]

No, but I mentioned it as I understand that the demographic of the Scottish paedo's arrested don't conform to his preffered demographic of abusers.

They were not protected by the police that I know. They were a bumch of scottish junkies that ran a "monstrous" abuse network, that involved putting parts of a victim in a microwave. They run a "beastie house" that held "rape nights."

https://news.sky.com/story/glasgow-paed ... g-13041623

I thought that as this was such a high profile and horrific crime against children, that he or his supporters would have commented by now?

Fact is all paedophiles should be executed whoever they are.
F*** all to do with Robinson.

[Coops]

I ask again, why would they?

Whatever you think of Robinson and his followers, the point they are making on this subject is that people were allowed to get away with their crimes, and that the victims suffered longer than necessary, because the skin colour and religion of the perpetrators meant those with the power to stop them failed to do so.

The fact that another group of scumbags to who this scenario doesn't apply to have been caught and punished is irrelevant. And the fact that Robinson and his followers are using the issue for their personal benefit is also irrelevant. Whether you like it or not the question they are asking is a valid one.

If he really cared why did he nearly bring the case into dispute? Why is he so vocal about those cases but completely silent about other cases?
What I think about him is that he is using these cases to push a political agenda and cares far less about the welfare of teenage girls in Rochdale than he does about getting his fanboys to feed his bank account.

[Patsy Belgium]

If he really cared why did he nearly bring the case into dispute? Why is he so vocal about those cases but completely silent about other cases?
What I think about him is that he is using these cases to push a political agenda and cares far less about the welfare of teenage girls in Rochdale than he does about getting his fanboys to feed his bank account.

Probably cares about the victims as much as the local authorities social services ,community leaders and the Police did in these scandals.

[Kentish Hammer]

If he really cared why did he nearly bring the case into dispute? Why is he so vocal about those cases but completely silent about other cases?
What I think about him is that he is using these cases to push a political agenda and cares far less about the welfare of teenage girls in Rochdale than he does about getting his fanboys to feed his bank account.

You won't find many people, me included, who dispute that he doesn't really care about the victims or that he is using the matter for his own personal and political agenda.

However the reason he is so vocal about these cases and not others is because these cases have unanswered questions that the others don't. And its a question the politicians and a lot of anti-Robinson people are too scared to face up to, hence why they scream racist at everyone to try and deflect from that fact.

[Up the Junction]

However the reason he is so vocal about these cases and not others is because these cases have unanswered questions that the others don't. And its a question the politicians and a lot of anti-Robinson people are too scared to face up to, hence why they scream racist at everyone to try and deflect from that fact.

If his is a just cause, as you claim - how comes he keeps ending up in jail?

[mcdaddy99]

Are people not aware of who exactly this bloke is and his history? He’s a disgusting, knuckle dragging racist thug. Regardless of any message he wants spread, he shouldn‘t be afforded any relevance or respect in the slightest.

https://bridge.georgetown.edu/research/ ... -robinson/

[Coops]

You won't find many people, me included, who dispute that he doesn't really care about the victims or that he is using the matter for his own personal and political agenda.

However the reason he is so vocal about these cases and not others is because these cases have unanswered questions that the others don't. And its a question the politicians and a lot of anti-Robinson people are too scared to face up to, hence why they scream racist at everyone to try and deflect from that fact.

Do you think these are the only cases that have unanswered questions?
What do you think it is about the perpetrators of these crimes that makes focusing on them and ignoring others so appealing to Yaxley-Lennon?

[Patsy Belgium]

Any news from Tommy and his pals about the Glasgow peados being sentenced?

Nope, I thought... Tumbleweed.

I wonder why that is?????

You could always write him a letter asking why.

[Prob]

Yet there is not a single condemnation from Tommy 20 names when it came to 20 members and supporters of the EDL convicted of child sexual exploitation offences when he was leader. He even defended Richard Price saying it was a set up when it was found he made indecent images of children. In June 2017, he shared a stage with William Charlton at a rally in Sunderland at an event where the sexual abuse of children was the key theme of the speeches. Lennon praised Charlton

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon has long sought to use the issue of child sexual exploitation to push his racist and Islamophobic agenda, sometimes explicitly against the wishes of the survivors. He has even acted in ways that have compromised legal proceedings against perpetrators, further revealing he cares more about his own career than actual justice for survivors. It is now also clear that he has no interest in calling out child abuse amongst his own supporters

Why is he not consistent?

[delbert]

If his is a just cause, as you claim - how comes he keeps ending up in jail?

Cos he's a berk........

[Kentish Hammer]

If his is a just cause, as you claim - how comes he keeps ending up in jail?

Because he is stupid and breaks the law when approaching the subject, as well as the fact that a big part of the reason he is in jail has nothing to do with the grooming gangs issue.

And I have never said his cause is just so don't put words in my mouth. I have just said that one of the questions he is raising within his rhetoric is justifiable and deserves an answer.

[Kentish Hammer]

Do you think these are the only cases that have unanswered questions?
What do you think it is about the perpetrators of these crimes that makes focusing on them and ignoring others so appealing to Yaxley-Lennon?

That they are Muslim and therefore castigating them fits in to his wider rhetoric. It's not hard is it.

Nor is it hard to understand that the wider point that he is clinging on to in order to promote that rhetoric is actually a genuine question deserving of an answer, hence why it gains traction from a wider and more reasonable audience.

[Kentish Hammer]

Yet there is not a single condemnation from Tommy 20 names when it came to 20 members and supporters of the EDL convicted of child sexual exploitation offences when he was leader. He even defended Richard Price saying it was a set up when it was found he made indecent images of children. In June 2017, he shared a stage with William Charlton at a rally in Sunderland at an event where the sexual abuse of children was the key theme of the speeches. Lennon praised Charlton

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon has long sought to use the issue of child sexual exploitation to push his racist and Islamophobic agenda, sometimes explicitly against the wishes of the survivors. He has even acted in ways that have compromised legal proceedings against perpetrators, further revealing he cares more about his own career than actual justice for survivors. It is now also clear that he has no interest in calling out child abuse amongst his own supporters

Why is he not consistent?

Because he is exploiting the issue for his own benefit.

Still doesn't change the fact that the perpetrators within his own party wouldn't have been afforded the same protection from the police, social services etc as perpetrators from other groups were and that answers as to why those people protecting them have not faced further action.

[hammers92]

Vile man. Deport him.

[delbert]

Did the grooming gang thread get locked or binned....?

[Ozza]

Vile man. Deport him.

As part of our deal with Trump can we off Tommy to El Salvador?