Specsavers feedback (Rio) suggests this is what happened.Crouchend_Hammer wrote:ITK feedback [Pezza] suggests this couldn't be further from the truth
It's like Pavlov's dog with you and CNR regarding this subject.
Moderator: Gnome
Specsavers feedback (Rio) suggests this is what happened.Crouchend_Hammer wrote:ITK feedback [Pezza] suggests this couldn't be further from the truth
Well, that is that then. Case closed!Rio wrote:
Specsavers feedback (Rio) suggests this is what happened.
Ozza wrote:Okazaki on a free, bloody hell yes please, although I would imagine he would be looking for longer than a year
Hi mate, how its going´... are you doin??.Patito wrote: He signed for Malaga a month ago and they have just released him as they can't afford his wages. He didn't play a league game for them. Not sure if that suggests he wasn't up to the mark or they were already having issues with him regarding wages. If we were getting the 15/16 Okazaki then he'd be a fantastic acquisition on a free for this season, I doubt we would though.
Universidad-de-Chile wrote: Hi mate, how its going´... are you doin??.
Hes ok, but probably not the Okazaki from 15/16, then, "Whats gone, its gone..."
Still, I see everywhere Bony being named, and Okazaki is a far more better player, imho, for example.
Thats what I just wanted to post... a good alternative..
But a big IF, still...
Good, nice to hear it from you (doin well).Patito wrote:
Very good mate thanks and you?
I thought as much. Especially as Malaga are second division now.
He certainly seemed to divide opinionAceface wrote:The disconnect that was always there was quite unusual – watching him playing for Mexico in the World Cup didn't feel remotely like watching a West Ham player turning out for them.
I remember at the time noticing it felt odd, because even someone who might only be on loan, like Joao Mario, you might keep an eye out for when Portugal played.
Not sure what it was, because he never did anything 'wrong'. Just one of those things perhaps.
Yeah, clearly.Crouchend_Hammer wrote:
Well, that is that then. Case closed!
That's you assuming no one else gets injured and Antonio already is for probably the length of time it'll take to get a new replacement in. See how precarious the situation could get...21212 wrote:Stick with what we have at present.
Signing players to fill squad numbers is pontless.
We have Haller, Ajeti, Antonio (when fit) and any fourth choice, free signing would get no game time anyway.
The truth is probably a bit of both...never had a reputation here for being problematic for managers, owners, fans, etc, but thinks very highly of himself and always aspires to play at a higher level. His arrogance and mannerisms on the field have never changed, and I've never thought a healthy bit of arrogance as a striker was a bad thing. He could stay and fight for 2nd pole or he could go to a club with Europa league games with a manager known for rotation, and maybe his 31 year old legs last a bit longer with this move as well. The hour drive to the beach in Cadiz so his wife can update her Instagram photos and promote brands probably didn't hurt the decision making process either.Rio wrote: Specsavers feedback (Rio) suggests this is what happened.
It's like Pavlov's dog with you and CNR regarding this subject.