Cuenca 'ammer wrote: ↑Sat Jul 23, 2022 9:05 pm
oh okay, it's like "you're entitled to an opinion however wrong it might be..."
my opinion is just that. as is yours. did I say you're opinion is wrong ?
I'll leave it there.
I honestly don't understand what you're getting at here, and this is a problem I have on NUMB a lot. This is for political discussion, people are going to disagree with you. I think I explained quite clearly why I disagree with what you said, please refute my argument if you wish to, or ignore it, but you seem to feel I've been rude to you? I wouldn't say "your opinion is wrong", I'd point out what I perceive to be the flaws in it, is that bad behaviour?
I really have no idea what the point of this whole subforum is if we aren't supposed to disagree with each other.
Collison Theory wrote: ↑Sun Jul 24, 2022 11:18 am
I really have no idea what the point of this whole subforum is if we aren't supposed to disagree with each other.
Macca1973 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 02, 2022 6:29 am
Still, nothing wrong with killing that c***!
That's the problem - nobody cares if the US decide to transfer their capital punishment to foreign countries.
But they're the only ones allowed to do so, somehow...
Daniel1895 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 02, 2022 8:21 am
That's the problem - nobody cares if the US decide to transfer their capital punishment to foreign countries.
But they're the only ones allowed to do so, somehow...
We’re talking about a confirmed, mass murdering terrorist. Not sure how anyone could have an issue with his elimination but I suppose it takes all sorts.
Macca1973 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 02, 2022 9:10 am
We’re talking about a confirmed, mass murdering terrorist. Not sure how anyone could have an issue with his elimination but I suppose it takes all sorts.
There a couple of people fitting that scheme.
How decides if they are free to be killed by anyone ?
Macca1973 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 02, 2022 9:10 am
We’re talking about a confirmed, mass murdering terrorist. Not sure how anyone could have an issue with his elimination but I suppose it takes all sorts.
Still pretty murky, though, executing someone without trial.
Terrorism is a dirty war, we’re talking about someone where there’s no confusion or ambiguity. A man who is bent on the destruction of America so yes they get to choose and execute his demise in my opinion.
Macca1973 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 02, 2022 9:10 am
We’re talking about a confirmed, mass murdering terrorist. Not sure how anyone could have an issue with his elimination but I suppose it takes all sorts.
Not saying I disagree with you ,but I could imagine the fuss from Joe and certain other sections of America had we done that to Gerry Adams.