👋 Farewell, Gianluca Scamacca

The Forum for all football-related discussion, including West Ham United FC. Our busiest Forum and the place to begin if you're new to KUMB.

Moderators: Gnome, last.caress, Wilko1304, Rio, bristolhammerfc, the pink palermo, chalks

Post Reply
Take It to the Limit
Posts: 1178
Joined: Mon May 16, 2022 8:17 pm
Has liked: 1225 likes
Total likes: 416 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by Take It to the Limit »

PlaistowIron wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 11:27 pm Doesn’t strike me as a character you want in your side for a dog fight/relegation battle.
Must admit, as much as I still think Scamacca will come good, I’d certainly liked to have seen us sign a Danny Ings type player in the summer too… an experienced goalscorer as a back up.
With Antonio looking past his best, we’ve basically thrown all our eggs in one basket by having to rely on Scamacca.
Maybe the young lad who (sort of) scored against FCSB may get a few minutes now and again.
User avatar
Doc H Ball
Posts: 14748
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:29 pm
Location: on parole
Has liked: 939 likes
Total likes: 1952 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by Doc H Ball »

Bubbles Fortuna wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:54 pm Haller hasn't proven anything in a serious league yet.
It was his form in the Bundesliga that caused us to make him our record signing.
User avatar
ironilunga
Posts: 9019
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:05 am
Has liked: 382 likes
Total likes: 1201 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by ironilunga »

Bubbles Fortuna wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:54 pm Obviously illness has stopped him, but Haller hasn't proven anything in a serious league yet.
German league, Dutch league, Champions League. He also scored goals for us in a system that he was ill suited to.

Emerging before his illness into a top European striker.
User avatar
Oldun
Posts: 8166
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 9:59 am
Location: living in the past and loving it.
Has liked: 172 likes
Total likes: 563 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by Oldun »

It’s either Moyes fault or Newmans fault that we have a player who does not suit Moyes style of play.
Either Moyes knew the type of forward we was getting or Newman identified the wrong type of player.
User avatar
hammers92
Posts: 12249
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:42 pm
Has liked: 314 likes
Total likes: 1786 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by hammers92 »

Oldun wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 8:40 am It’s either Moyes fault or Newmans fault that we have a player who does not suit Moyes style of play.
Either Moyes knew the type of forward we was getting or Newman identified the wrong type of player.
Let’s be clear, Moyes wanted Broja and he was the No.1 target.

We’re not accommodating him whatsoever, and imo, it’s becoming more and more obvious that the manager didn’t want him. Which opens up a whole new debate about why we did it.
westhamlinnet
Posts: 435
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:49 pm
Has liked: 9 likes
Total likes: 70 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by westhamlinnet »

I hope I am wrong but the best description I have heard of him is the Italian statue
Ilford Paolo
Posts: 729
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2021 2:00 pm
Has liked: 454 likes
Total likes: 129 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by Ilford Paolo »

Bubbles Fortuna wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:54 pm Obviously illness has stopped him, but Haller hasn't proven anything in a serious league yet.
Is the CL not a serious league then? (And while he had cancer developing in his body).

Lots of players score for fun in Holland. I don't think we should be using him as a stick to beat the club with.

Anderson as well was awful for us after his first three months. He dragged us single handedly to a win against Southampton and then swapped places with his terrible at football twin brother.
User avatar
Diogenes
Posts: 5146
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 5:07 pm
Has liked: 480 likes
Total likes: 1201 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by Diogenes »

hammers92 wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 8:42 am Let’s be clear, Moyes wanted Broja and he was the No.1 target.

We’re not accommodating him whatsoever, and imo, it’s becoming more and more obvious that the manager didn’t want him. Which opens up a whole new debate about why we did it.
With respect H92, why is it 'obvious' that Moyes didnt want him? What am I missing that makes this 100% true. I get that it is your view, but obvious?
User avatar
Westbourne Bill
Posts: 7483
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 5:49 pm
Location: W Sussex
Has liked: 130 likes
Total likes: 333 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by Westbourne Bill »

Oldun wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 8:40 am It’s either Moyes fault or Newmans fault that we have a player who does not suit Moyes style of play.
Either Moyes knew the type of forward we was getting or Newman identified the wrong type of player.
Or maybe the player himself is to blame?
User avatar
Burnley Hammer
Posts: 16500
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:19 pm
Location: was Colne, Burnley, Hull, Colchester, Norwich, Derby.... Now Nottingham
Has liked: 236 likes
Total likes: 2575 likes
Contact:

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by Burnley Hammer »

hammers92 wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 8:42 am Let’s be clear, Moyes wanted Broja and he was the No.1 target.

We’re not accommodating him whatsoever, and imo, it’s becoming more and more obvious that the manager didn’t want him. Which opens up a whole new debate about why we did it.
I'm not convinced of that.

Players always seem to be the managers choice until they start playing badly, and then all of a sudden they were forced on him. I don't doubt that Moyes wanted Broja - but he will have had more names on his list. He's have had a plan B and a plan C. If he only had a plan A then that would have been foolish.

I think people in general were very happy when Scamacca signed. A lot rated him.
The same applies to Haller.
The same applies to Vlasic.

We give them 10 games to settle in (if they're lucky) and then we turn on them.

Almost always, what inevitably follows are claims that they weren't the managers choice and they were Sulli buys. This happens to almost every signing that we perceive to have failed.

If they're playing well then that generally means they were the managers pick.

I'm just not buying it.
User avatar
hammers92
Posts: 12249
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:42 pm
Has liked: 314 likes
Total likes: 1786 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by hammers92 »

Diogenes wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 9:23 am With respect H92, why is it 'obvious' that Moyes didnt want him? What am I missing that makes this 100% true. I get that it is your view, but obvious?
I think we’re asking him to slot into how we play instead of building the side around him. We set up in the same way and formation as last year and don’t play to his strengths.

I also think Broja and Scamacca are two completely different players. Scamacca doesn’t have the pace to lead the line for the counter so we need to adjust our approach.

The more we keep losing the more I think back to the summer and missing out on the manager’s No.1 targets. It just doesn’t add up for me.
User avatar
hammers92
Posts: 12249
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:42 pm
Has liked: 314 likes
Total likes: 1786 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by hammers92 »

Burnley Hammer wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 9:27 am I'm just not buying it.
Some fair points in that post. I just think Scamacca plays a certain way and we need to build our side around him. He’s the big money striker and if we’re not playing to his own strengths, then that’s either tactical or a very bad signing.

I think Moyes was looking for a younger Antonio and Broja was that. I think either we play to Scamacca’s style or he doesn’t play at all.
User avatar
Bubbles Fortuna
Posts: 18258
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2021 1:25 pm
Has liked: 1992 likes
Total likes: 4742 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by Bubbles Fortuna »

Ilford Paolo wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 9:22 am
All of his goals came in those 6 group stage matches, 4 coming in one game against Sporting, the Portuguese league isn't a major league no.

2 against Dortmund, and the rest against Besiktas.

So no, not a major league.

It's just an easy dig at the manager when he also flopped under Pellegrini and obviously wanted to leave. He just didn't suit the league.
User avatar
Burnley Hammer
Posts: 16500
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:19 pm
Location: was Colne, Burnley, Hull, Colchester, Norwich, Derby.... Now Nottingham
Has liked: 236 likes
Total likes: 2575 likes
Contact:

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by Burnley Hammer »

hammers92 wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 9:29 am I think we’re asking him to slot into how we play instead of building the side around him. We set up in the same way and formation as last year and don’t play to his strengths.

I also think Broja and Scamacca are two completely different players. Scamacca doesn’t have the pace to lead the line for the counter so we need to adjust our approach.

The more we keep losing the more I think back to the summer and missing out on the manager’s No.1 targets. It just doesn’t add up for me.
Countering doesn't just mean whacking a long ball forward for the striker to chase. If it's done properly then there's a whole passage of play before that. Other players should be getting up there in support quickly and overlapping. Our counter attacking is failing simply because we're not very good at it at the moment. We're not very good at anything at the moment. Passages of play are generally worked on a lot in training. I just fear that ours are very rigid and have become incredibly predictable.
User avatar
DusseldorfHammer
Posts: 5872
Joined: Sun May 30, 2021 8:34 am
Has liked: 3052 likes
Total likes: 2693 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by DusseldorfHammer »

Bubbles Fortuna wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 9:35 am All of his goals came in those 6 group stage matches, 4 coming in one game against Sporting, the Portuguese league isn't a major league no.

2 against Dortmund, and the rest against Besiktas.

So no, not a major league.

It's just an easy dig at the manager when he also flopped under Pellegrini and obviously wanted to leave. He just didn't suit the league.
Ajax were hdppy to sell Haller for a good prize. Makes you wonder.
User avatar
stu1
Posts: 12582
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 4:57 pm
Has liked: 669 likes
Total likes: 1038 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by stu1 »

The way Moyes has spoken about Scamacca I find it hard to believe he didn’t want him. I think it’s a bit of cop out to claim Moyes didn’t want any of these players, especially when mentioning our style of play.

Moyes has said on numerous occasions to develop we need to control games more and become better on the ball and our signings suggest that is the plan. The fact Moyes isn’t actually changing our tactics is baffling given what he has said, so only he knows why we continue to not use players in the correct way.
User avatar
hammers92
Posts: 12249
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:42 pm
Has liked: 314 likes
Total likes: 1786 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by hammers92 »

Burnley Hammer wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 9:37 am Countering doesn't just mean whacking a long ball forward for the striker to chase. If it's done properly then there's a whole passage of play before that. Other players should be getting up there in support quickly and overlapping. Our counter attacking is failing simply because we're not very good at it at the moment. We're not very good at anything at the moment. Passages of play are generally worked on a lot in training. I just fear that ours are very rigid and have become incredibly predictable.
Agree with that. Personally, I think we start Antonio on Boxing Day if the manager is still here as the system works with him in it rather than Scamacca. Though that also won’t be popular!
1895Hammer
Posts: 2523
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 7:41 pm
Has liked: 1365 likes
Total likes: 770 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by 1895Hammer »

I wonder if Cornet is the missing link here ? He has real pace and 9 goals in a struggling Burnley side suggest he can finish. Was he supposed to be the Raspadori in the equation, providing speed and better opportunity for Scamacca and Paqueta to pay 1-2’s and “ 3rd man running “ football ? If that was the plan I still don’t see why Bowen couldn’t be played close to Scamacca, not as fast as Cornet we know he can score.
Moyes is undoubtedly too obstinate, but surely he can’t have bought Scamacca thinking he’d make him 2 yards faster and get him chasing punts over the top ?
User avatar
Kermit
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 7:48 pm
Location: Hertfordshire
Has liked: 98 likes
Total likes: 341 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by Kermit »

We aren't getting the best out of someone who imo is a very good player,because we are not asking Scammaca to play like Scamacca, we are expecting him to play like Antonio. If Moyes was so obsessed with getting in another striker to share striking duties with Antonio and play the same way he should have intensified his pursuit of Broja, or at least someone similar in style to Broja. He is much more an Antonio style player than Scammaca.

It's the same with Paqueta. I haven't seen enough of Paqueta to really know what type of player he is but it has become very apparent in the short while he has been with us that he is totally unsuited fo what we, on present form, laughingly describe as our "system". I would have hoped that at the very least our recruitment team and Moyes would have known what sort of player they were buying. Worrying though it hightens my suspicion the You Tube blog doing the rounds about Silkman, the vertically challenged one's pet agent, playing a very big part in bringing Paqueta to the club might contain more than an element of truth.

Joined up recruitment thinking it most certainly is not.
User avatar
mumbles87
Posts: 17764
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 10:35 am
Has liked: 55 likes
Total likes: 948 likes

Re: ✍ Gianluca Scamacca

Post by mumbles87 »

hammers92 wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 9:33 am Some fair points in that post. I just think Scamacca plays a certain way and we need to build our side around him. He’s the big money striker and if we’re not playing to his own strengths, then that’s either tactical or a very bad signing.

I think Moyes was looking for a younger Antonio and Broja was that. I think either we play to Scamacca’s style or he doesn’t play at all.
I know we love to rewrite history when things suit but broja isn't anything like antonio , he is as slow as scamacca..
Post Reply