Nottingham Forest 1-0 West Ham Utd (14/8/22)

Relive every moment of every first team game since the beginning of the 2005/06 season. Our archive of matchday threads originally posted in the General Discussion Forum.

Moderator: Gnome

Post Reply
SA_Hammer
Posts: 158
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2019 10:42 am
Has liked: 8 likes
Total likes: 5 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by SA_Hammer »

claretandblue82 wrote: Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:52 pm Has a match thread ever hit 100 pages, I don’t recall ever seeing one? This one will be there by the morning!
Come on...we are on page 99 !!

More effort
SA_Hammer
Posts: 158
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2019 10:42 am
Has liked: 8 likes
Total likes: 5 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by SA_Hammer »

il_martello_di_genovesi wrote: Mon Aug 15, 2022 11:24 am ‘Should of’ does mean that there shouldn’t always be a need to overreact though. Why do you think we lost the game? If you think in part it’s because of a harshly disallowed goal, a penalty miss, a flukey goal conceded, hitting the bar twice, missing rebounds and a failure to send McKenna off, then you probably should give a little more thought into the ‘should of’ part of it.
If we are being pedantic....its should have...not should of!
johnnyb
Posts: 2335
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 3:20 pm
Has liked: 31 likes
Total likes: 65 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by johnnyb »

Just out of curiosity I watched the MOTD2 highlights again because I thought during the match that Henderson had his right foot well of the line before Rice kicked the ball. Slow motion shows he did. Ref never noticed in real time but why doesn't VAR advise the ref? Just another example of the pure bad luck we had during this game.
User avatar
e20too
Posts: 1065
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:25 pm
Has liked: 665 likes
Total likes: 209 likes
Contact:

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by e20too »

goingunderground wrote: Mon Aug 15, 2022 2:46 pm One of those games. If Paltrow misses the train, we win 5-0.
Aah Revolving Doors eh
User avatar
thamesideiron
Posts: 874
Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 9:49 am
Has liked: 126 likes
Total likes: 197 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by thamesideiron »

kitthehammer wrote: Mon Aug 15, 2022 12:35 pm sorry but what did cresswell have to do with the goal that was conceded?
Nothing Mate,was just talking in General...I really like Cress....But Full Backs are massively important now,We need a bit extra there now.
They're up and down like wingers these days even in a 4,fittest quickest players on the pitch...Think he divides a lot of opinion among us tho.
User avatar
Woans Left Peg
Dreaming of Malmo
Posts: 6337
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 11:23 pm
Location: Lost and confused
Has liked: 19 likes
Total likes: 28 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by Woans Left Peg »

johnnyb wrote: Mon Aug 15, 2022 6:37 pm Just out of curiosity I watched the MOTD2 highlights again because I thought during the match that Henderson had his right foot well of the line before Rice kicked the ball. Slow motion shows he did. Ref never noticed in real time but why doesn't VAR advise the ref? Just another example of the pure bad luck we had during this game.
VAR didn't advise the ref because no offence was committed. Specifically from the rules:
When the ball is kicked, the defending goalkeeper must have at least part of one foot touching, in line with, or behind, the goal line.
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-go ... nalty-kick

Henderson's left foot was on the line at the moment Rice hit the ball; it was perfect goalkeeping technique.

Image
User avatar
Vic_Watson
Posts: 8033
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:25 pm
Location: Brazil
Has liked: 167 likes
Total likes: 259 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by Vic_Watson »

goingunderground wrote: Mon Aug 15, 2022 2:46 pm One of those games. If Paltrow misses the train, we win 5-0.
Or if the ref had.
User avatar
Plashet Grove Pete
Posts: 4514
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: I'm riding down Kingsley, figurin' I'll get a drink ....
Has liked: 261 likes
Total likes: 459 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by Plashet Grove Pete »

SA_Hammer wrote: Mon Aug 15, 2022 6:33 pm If we are being pedantic....its should have...not should of!
... and if we're being really pedantic .... "it's should have" ... not "its should have".
User avatar
Captain Corelli
Posts: 503
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2020 11:55 am
Has liked: 162 likes
Total likes: 87 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by Captain Corelli »

goingunderground wrote: Mon Aug 15, 2022 2:46 pm One of those games. If Paltrow misses the train, we win 5-0.
Ag ag!!
Online
hammerman11
Posts: 15810
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 9:01 pm
Has liked: 25 likes
Total likes: 744 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by hammerman11 »

encroachment by forest player should have been retaken.
User avatar
Bubbles Fortuna
Posts: 17824
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2021 1:25 pm
Has liked: 1934 likes
Total likes: 4635 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by Bubbles Fortuna »

hammerman11 wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 7:52 am encroachment by forest player should have been retaken.
Only if the encroachment is beneficial.

Had Henderson parried it and the encroaching Forest player cleared the ball then yes.
User avatar
swash
Posts: 3668
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:30 pm
Location: Not enough middle fingers
Has liked: 140 likes
Total likes: 188 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by swash »

Give it up, it was a **** penalty that was legitimately saved.

Move on
DenziMart
Posts: 465
Joined: Wed May 26, 2021 5:40 pm
Has liked: 8 likes
Total likes: 154 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by DenziMart »

hammerman11 wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 7:52 am encroachment by forest player should have been retaken.
My understanding is it's only considered encroachment now if the defender impacts the play. If the ball spilled from Henderson and the defender who encroached clears it, then it's a retake. As Henderson held the ball, the defender had no involvement so it's not considered encroachment.
I may be wrong, but that's how I've seen it play out in many games in recent years.
Romfordboy
Posts: 2098
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 12:07 pm
Has liked: 150 likes
Total likes: 288 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by Romfordboy »

billtho
Posts: 1102
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 2:30 pm
Has liked: 40 likes
Total likes: 230 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by billtho »

Just watched motd 2...Fab did have a good game but wtf is he doing sitting on his arse after going to his left when the ball was never going that way for the goal.
User avatar
Beavis Danzig
Posts: 6968
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2014 9:12 pm
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue
Has liked: 3 likes
Total likes: 733 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by Beavis Danzig »

a pen is worth something like .75 xg for what it's worth.
User avatar
Bubbles Fortuna
Posts: 17824
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2021 1:25 pm
Has liked: 1934 likes
Total likes: 4635 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by Bubbles Fortuna »

Beavis Danzig wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 12:55 pm a pen is worth something like .75 xg for what it's worth.
Rice's entire xG was about 0.75 so that makes sense.

I think we win that game if we score that penalty, would have deflated Forest and given us a boost.
User avatar
sutts07
Posts: 13066
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 2:55 pm
Location: Block 112, a far cry from CR1
Has liked: 24 likes
Total likes: 539 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by sutts07 »

Soucek's header has to be a goal, that one was poor.
Rice's pen was poor too, telegraphed it and didn't strike it well either (Benrahma should have had it with the form he was in).
Fornals long range effort inches away from going in.
Benrahma's free kick the same.
Benrahma's goal would have been fine too had Antonio been a little smarter in the build up.

As others have said, on another day that is a decent and comfortable two goal away win.
User avatar
Colours never run
Posts: 25386
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 1:46 am
Location: "Be in no doubt, we are part of the most successful stadium migration in history"
Has liked: 6811 likes
Total likes: 2363 likes

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by Colours never run »

Romfordboy wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 8:29 am
Which means what? :eh:
User avatar
-DL-
Bag Man
Posts: 30097
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:43 am
Has liked: 837 likes
Total likes: 4952 likes
Contact:

Re: ⚽ Nottingham Forest v West Ham United: match thread

Post by -DL- »

Colours never run wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 9:43 pm Which means what? :eh:
f*** all...
Post Reply