Absolutely. I don’t understand the emphasis on how well we apparently stopped their midfield. We lost the game, Eriksen set up the goal anyway and it basically nullified our attack. An Xg of 0.26 up til the 80th minute. Still, congratulations on us having more blocked shots and stifling their midfield enough to lose the game.
⚽ Manchester Utd 1-0 West Ham Utd (30/10/22)
Moderator: Gnome
- il_martello_di_genovesi
- Posts: 16744
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:11 pm
- Location: genova è solo blucerchiata.
- Has liked: 676 likes
- Total likes: 1969 likes
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
- hammer1975
- Posts: 16641
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 10:16 pm
- Has liked: 934 likes
- Total likes: 1089 likes
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
This is a really important point imo. Young Jack on Twitter is asking some really interesting questions;MB wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 10:29 pm But that is the point. We controlled the midfield really well and he still set up the winning goal.
Also hit a couple of lovely 30 yard balls over the top.
We had no one in midfield capable of anything like that and ultimately for all our midfield control he helped decide the game.
-If a player plays really well for most of the game but makes one mistake that leads to a goal against us - did he play well?
-If a player plays pretty poorly but scores or assists - does that mean they played well?
Or words to those effects.
I think the answer depends, and for me it depends on the whole team balance.
I think we can afford to ‘carry’ one player who only has ‘moments’ in the game - when those moments are so key they help you win the game. We’ve currently got players in attack who have those ‘moments’ - but they don’t translate into goals or assists enough.
At the other end we have defenders who largely defend well for most of the game but are getting punished for their one ricket a game.
That balance needs to shift if we are to improve results.
- Ironing Board
- Posts: 22075
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:11 am
- Has liked: 2082 likes
- Total likes: 1791 likes
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
That’s a losers mentality. Like a tennis player saying there’s no difference to losing in a tiebreaker vs 6-0 6-2il_martello_di_genovesi wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 10:34 pm Absolutely. I don’t understand the emphasis on how well we apparently stopped their midfield. We lost the game, Eriksen set up the goal anyway and it basically nullified our attack. An Xg of 0.26 up til the 80th minute. Still, congratulations on us having more blocked shots and stifling their midfield enough to lose the game.
- il_martello_di_genovesi
- Posts: 16744
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:11 pm
- Location: genova è solo blucerchiata.
- Has liked: 676 likes
- Total likes: 1969 likes
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
Haha. You’ve been going on about ‘who did we play’ it was Liverpool and Man Utd and you have the front to say someone else has a losers mentality. Laughable :lol:.Ironing Board wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 10:44 pm That’s a losers mentality. Like a tennis player saying there’s no difference to losing in a tiebreaker vs 6-0 6-2
A losers mentality is what your mate has when it comes to the top clubs away from home.
- Tezza65
- Posts: 2108
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2020 10:29 pm
- Location: Bedfordshire
- Has liked: 1932 likes
- Total likes: 585 likes
- Contact:
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
Soucek should be dropped,because he offers us nothing at this moment in time.westhamlinnet wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 1:54 pm I think formals is a good number 10 . Moyes has done wonders for us but I am struggling as how Downes can be played as a number 10
- Doc H Ball
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:29 pm
- Location: on parole
- Has liked: 917 likes
- Total likes: 1919 likes
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
Actually, it's far more accurate to say that he has a 'must not lose' attitude.
- Ironing Board
- Posts: 22075
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:11 am
- Has liked: 2082 likes
- Total likes: 1791 likes
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
Nope. Going out and playing open and finding yourself three goals down before halftime is the loser’s approach.il_martello_di_genovesi wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 10:51 pm Haha. You’ve been going on about ‘who did we play’ it was Liverpool and Man Utd and you have the front to say someone else has a losers mentality. Laughable :lol:.
A losers mentality is what your mate has when it comes to the top clubs away from home.
- Bubbles Fortuna
- Posts: 17824
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2021 1:25 pm
- Has liked: 1934 likes
- Total likes: 4635 likes
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
You're right with that.Doc H Ball wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 10:54 pm Actually, it's far more accurate to say that he has a 'must not lose' attitude.
He's very much in the mind of "if we keep a clean sheet then that's at least one point guaranteed."
- il_martello_di_genovesi
- Posts: 16744
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:11 pm
- Location: genova è solo blucerchiata.
- Has liked: 676 likes
- Total likes: 1969 likes
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
So we’re that bad, that if we attempted to attack more in the first half, we’d find ourselves 3-0 down? Stop it, please…Ironing Board wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 10:56 pm Nope. Going out and playing open and finding yourself three goals down before halftime is the loser’s approach.
Clearly you’re pleased that we kept it to 1-0 at half time, yet as I say again, you have the front to mention someone else and a losers mentality…
- Ironing Board
- Posts: 22075
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:11 am
- Has liked: 2082 likes
- Total likes: 1791 likes
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
Yes. Because we would have got ripped to bits by a much stronger side.il_martello_di_genovesi wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 11:00 pm So we’re that bad, that if we attempted to attack more in the first half, we’d find ourselves 3-0 down? Stop it, please…
Clearly you’re pleased that we kept it to 1-0 at half time, yet as I say again, you have the front to mention someone else and a losers mentality…
- Tezza65
- Posts: 2108
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2020 10:29 pm
- Location: Bedfordshire
- Has liked: 1932 likes
- Total likes: 585 likes
- Contact:
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
They always say the best form of defence is to attack.il_martello_di_genovesi wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 11:00 pm So we’re that bad, that if we attempted to attack more in the first half, we’d find ourselves 3-0 down? Stop it, please…
Clearly you’re pleased that we kept it to 1-0 at half time, yet as I say again, you have the front to mention someone else and a losers mentality…
- 'stone hammer
- Posts: 3518
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 7:28 pm
- Location: Computer chair
- Has liked: 718 likes
- Total likes: 497 likes
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
In those 70 minutes, we had 6 shots (out of 13) with 1 on target (out of 5). Hardly gung-ho I agree, but some attempts nonetheless.Doc H Ball wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 9:55 pm I'm not sure that's right. For the better part of 70 minutes we often went sideways or backwards, players knocking it about whilst getting into shape rather than play a fast forward ball.
Honestly, it made sense to me. Going all out is when Man U are at their most lethal; it made sense to keep it tight, make sure we're not 3-0 down at 80 minutes, and see if we can get a goal back.
Were we playing a bottom half team, I'd share the frustration.
- il_martello_di_genovesi
- Posts: 16744
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:11 pm
- Location: genova è solo blucerchiata.
- Has liked: 676 likes
- Total likes: 1969 likes
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
No one even suggested all out attack. That’s IB exaggeration. The same way it’s exaggeration to suggest that attacking more in the first half would see us concede 3 goals. Well, we conceded 1 and lost. He champions that fact and then accuses others of a losers mentality. It has to be a deliberate wind up, but my fault for getting involved.
For all the more corners and blocked shots we apparently had, our Xg was a lot lower than theirs and we were beaten. So while we could’ve got something out of the game fair and square, it’s not really a massively unfair result either.
- 'stone hammer
- Posts: 3518
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 7:28 pm
- Location: Computer chair
- Has liked: 718 likes
- Total likes: 497 likes
- 'stone hammer
- Posts: 3518
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 7:28 pm
- Location: Computer chair
- Has liked: 718 likes
- Total likes: 497 likes
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
Yes, particularly if they play for one of the Sky 6. At least that's what Garth Crooks told me.hammer1975 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 10:42 pm -If a player plays pretty poorly but scores or assists - does that mean they played well?
- Tezza65
- Posts: 2108
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2020 10:29 pm
- Location: Bedfordshire
- Has liked: 1932 likes
- Total likes: 585 likes
- Contact:
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
I am obviously joking there.il_martello_di_genovesi wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 11:08 pm No one even suggested all out attack. That’s IB exaggeration. The same way it’s exaggeration to suggest that attacking more in the first half would see us concede 3 goals. Well, we conceded 1 and lost. He champions that fact and then accuses others of a losers mentality. It has to be a deliberate wind up, but my fault for getting involved.
For all the more corners and blocked shots we apparently had, our Xg was a lot lower than theirs and we were beaten. So while we could’ve got something out of the game fair and square, it’s not really a massively unfair result either.
Moyes's philosophy though is to keep it at 1-0 and have a go near the end.
Personally,I think Pearce had quite a say in that dressing room and we were more of an attacking team,when he was there.We were scoring 2 and 3's,sometimes 4's every week,now we are lucky if we see us score 2.
I think Moyes become a bit more defensive in the second part of last season and just MAYBE Pearce didn't agree with principle of what he was doing and decided to leave at the end of the season.
I would love to hear why he did leave.
I would love to hear what the players think of the approach this season too.
- bubbles1966
- Posts: 66972
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: I'm holding onto nothing, and trying to forget the rest
- Has liked: 2437 likes
- Total likes: 4293 likes
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
I didn't watch yesterday's game live because I was out and travelling so had to make do with Flashscore text Commentary for the first half, 5 Live for much of the second and caught the final 5-10 on TV.
Watching the Flashscore, I saw that we kicked off and wondered which full back we'd lofted it towards for Soucek to try to win a header, and was comforted to see that we'd done exactly that when I caught up with the replay - it's like a comfy pair of slippers.
Then the text commentary was telling me that we had a fair share of the ball but not many shots so I kind of assumed we'd sat back etc, but having watched the re-run we must have forced somewhere between six and ten turnovers deep in their half, only to fritter them away with our dear old friend 'poor execution' turning up to thwart us again.
Watching the playback I was astonished at how much space and time we had, yet we still wasted it. That's an issue of quality, not intent. You won't have shots if you pass the ball badly in that area of the pitch.
Aside from a three minute flurry of turnovers around the 15 minute mark , one of which resulted in a great block by Soucek, they didn't pose much of a threat. Their goal was a nice enough cross but it was about the forward attacking it , whilst our defender was static and a bit flat footed.
We improved with the removal of Scamacca and Downes, becoming more robust up top and more positive with our passing. Benrahma-Bowen-Fornals-Antonio is pretty much the front four that had us doing so well for much of the last two years and it's starting to feel like we need to go back to that.
Yes, we had some efforts and chances towards the end, but we shouldn't forget that Fred had a free header that hit the post.
All in all, it was a pretty decent overall effort from our lot but a very mixed bag individually. A point wouldn't have been unjust but that's the most we might have deserved.
I'd give a big shout out to Zouma and Benrahma - both did very well. I thought Bowen was lively as well.
Watching the Flashscore, I saw that we kicked off and wondered which full back we'd lofted it towards for Soucek to try to win a header, and was comforted to see that we'd done exactly that when I caught up with the replay - it's like a comfy pair of slippers.
Then the text commentary was telling me that we had a fair share of the ball but not many shots so I kind of assumed we'd sat back etc, but having watched the re-run we must have forced somewhere between six and ten turnovers deep in their half, only to fritter them away with our dear old friend 'poor execution' turning up to thwart us again.
Watching the playback I was astonished at how much space and time we had, yet we still wasted it. That's an issue of quality, not intent. You won't have shots if you pass the ball badly in that area of the pitch.
Aside from a three minute flurry of turnovers around the 15 minute mark , one of which resulted in a great block by Soucek, they didn't pose much of a threat. Their goal was a nice enough cross but it was about the forward attacking it , whilst our defender was static and a bit flat footed.
We improved with the removal of Scamacca and Downes, becoming more robust up top and more positive with our passing. Benrahma-Bowen-Fornals-Antonio is pretty much the front four that had us doing so well for much of the last two years and it's starting to feel like we need to go back to that.
Yes, we had some efforts and chances towards the end, but we shouldn't forget that Fred had a free header that hit the post.
All in all, it was a pretty decent overall effort from our lot but a very mixed bag individually. A point wouldn't have been unjust but that's the most we might have deserved.
I'd give a big shout out to Zouma and Benrahma - both did very well. I thought Bowen was lively as well.
Last edited by bubbles1966 on Mon Oct 31, 2022 11:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Bubbles Fortuna
- Posts: 17824
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2021 1:25 pm
- Has liked: 1934 likes
- Total likes: 4635 likes
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
Pearce left because Moyes was too defensive and Pearce was the reason behind our good attacking displays.
Now that's some wild speculation!
Now that's some wild speculation!
- Tezza65
- Posts: 2108
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2020 10:29 pm
- Location: Bedfordshire
- Has liked: 1932 likes
- Total likes: 585 likes
- Contact:
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
I did mean to put "MAYBE" in capitals.Bubbles Fortuna wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 11:27 pm Pearce left because Moyes was too defensive and Pearce was the reason behind our good attacking displays.
Now that's some wild speculation!
Has you say, speculation.
- Doc H Ball
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:29 pm
- Location: on parole
- Has liked: 917 likes
- Total likes: 1919 likes
Re: ⚽ Manchester United vs West Ham United: match thread
Not necessarily disagreeing, but you said it wasn't under instruction and now accept it was Moyes' gameplan.'stone hammer wrote: ↑Mon Oct 31, 2022 11:08 pm In those 70 minutes, we had 6 shots (out of 13) with 1 on target (out of 5). Hardly gung-ho I agree, but some attempts nonetheless.
Honestly, it made sense to me. Going all out is when Man U are at their most lethal; it made sense to keep it tight, make sure we're not 3-0 down at 80 minutes, and see if we can get a goal back.
Were we playing a bottom half team, I'd share the frustration.