⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers 1-0 West Ham Utd (14/1/23)

Relive every moment of every first team game since the beginning of the 2005/06 season. Our archive of matchday threads originally posted in the General Discussion Forum.

Moderator: Gnome

Post Reply
User avatar
Cuenca 'ammer
ex 'ouston 'ammer
Posts: 40932
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 4:19 pm
Location: Journey to the dead of night. High on a hill in Eldorado
Has liked: 1994 likes
Total likes: 1671 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Cuenca 'ammer »

Burnley Hammer wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 11:33 am The biggest fault surely being with our corner strategy in the first place?
forget where I mentioned it, maybe in the Moyes thread, and I know it seems like hindsight but it isn't.

I mentioned I was concerned in general that we give away too many chances or even second chance from our corners.

I said that we either give up a goal directly, or give up a free kick in a dangerous area which leads to a goal scoring opportunity or a corner.

it's ridiculous. and I would mind, but it wouldn't be so concerning if it didn't happen that often. but it seems to. I don't mean 5 times a game but with enough regularity that we would have thought that someone would have fixed it, but here yet again, we concede from our own corner.

beggars belief..
Ilford Paolo
Posts: 729
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2021 2:00 pm
Has liked: 454 likes
Total likes: 129 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Ilford Paolo »

Just read Jack Elderton's player by player analysis of the Wolves match.Lots to agree with including the Bowen 4/10 but Cresswell at 7/10 ? :crylol:
User avatar
Johnny Byrne's Boots
Posts: 32378
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:19 pm
Location: Care home dodger
Has liked: 1858 likes
Total likes: 2107 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Johnny Byrne's Boots »

There's a good Twitter thread (honest!) on Wolves' goal, in particular how our captain didn't exactly cover himself in glory.



Click on the tweet and it will take you to the thread, you don't need a Twitter account to read it.

In the fifth image it should read 'top left' not 'top right' for Rice's position.
User avatar
the pink palermo
Huge noggin
Posts: 45155
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: The Notorious Gate B @LS
Has liked: 813 likes
Total likes: 3033 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by the pink palermo »

JBB, I pointed out two days ago Rice was in the wrong position altogether, doing the wrong job when the corner kick was taken.

In recent weeks we have seen him taking the corners, it's almost as if he wants to do anything but be a proper DM.

In fairness to him, it just might be that the coaching staff are telling him to do what he currently is, in which case, fire the lot of them.
User avatar
Johnny Byrne's Boots
Posts: 32378
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:19 pm
Location: Care home dodger
Has liked: 1858 likes
Total likes: 2107 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Johnny Byrne's Boots »

^^^^^Almost as if he's saying "Look, I can do all this too" to anyone who might be interested.
Crouchend_Hammer
Posts: 26541
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:31 am
Location: Forest Gate
Has liked: 144 likes
Total likes: 2406 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Crouchend_Hammer »

Unfortunately he has take a bit of poetic licence with that analysis.

It was Rice who made the challenge in the Wloves box. Once he had got up from the challenge, and recovered his footing, their attack had started and the only West Ham player further away from our box was Antonio. Soucek and Paquetta were already 10 yards ahead of him.

Could he have run back quicker, yes. But there is no way he is catching up with the play from his starting position. As I mentioned in the previous post, even Usain Bolt wouldn't have got back

None of the players he mentioned overtook Rice gettibg back at any point. They were already infront of him when the break started and Rice got up from the floor, so the poster is clearly making a specific 'incorrect' point to dig him out - no idea why

We had enough players back to deal with that break, including two players whose responsibility it is to do that
User avatar
Burnley Hammer
Posts: 16500
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:19 pm
Location: was Colne, Burnley, Hull, Colchester, Norwich, Derby.... Now Nottingham
Has liked: 236 likes
Total likes: 2575 likes
Contact:

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Burnley Hammer »

The main issue wasn't players not getting back - it was not having the correct players covering in the first place
Crouchend_Hammer
Posts: 26541
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:31 am
Location: Forest Gate
Has liked: 144 likes
Total likes: 2406 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Crouchend_Hammer »

Burnley Hammer wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:28 pm The main issue wasn't players not getting back - it was not having the correct players covering in the first place
Yes we did
Coufal and Cresswell back deep, adn Fornals on the edge of the box. That is how you should set up in that situation

two CBs, Antonio, Rice, Soucek in the box attacking the cross

You could argue Paquetta doesn't need to be right in there, but nothing wrong with loading up the box when you need a win

Unfoirtunately it was an inswinging corner that attracted all those players towards the goal, but didn't quite reach them, and they then get a lucky break of the ball which meant it landed right at their feet, and not ours, and teed up for a quick breakaway

Normally the corner would be cleared, or deflected, or ricochet around a bit. It is very rare the defending team pick up the ball and are able to start an attack with the ball at their feet in the penalty box. After the Rice tackle the ball could have gone anywhere but happened to land at their players feet .Very bad luck on our part that

The one thing you could say is possobly Soucek should have seen the corner wasn't going to reach him and then drop a bit deeper for a possible miscued clearance. But that is being very picky
Last edited by Crouchend_Hammer on Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Vic_Watson
Posts: 8033
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:25 pm
Location: Brazil
Has liked: 166 likes
Total likes: 258 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Vic_Watson »

Sure I saw someone digging Bowen out for not tracking back when in fact the guy who took our corner was the only West Ham player in the box when Wolves scored!
Crouchend_Hammer
Posts: 26541
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:31 am
Location: Forest Gate
Has liked: 144 likes
Total likes: 2406 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Crouchend_Hammer »

Vic_Watson wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:43 pm Sure I saw someone digging Bowen out for not tracking back when in fact the guy who took our corner was the only West Ham player in the box when Wolves scored!
He did was he is supposed to do as the corner taker. As soon as you see the corner has broken down and you are not going to get the ball again in the next phase, you leg it back
User avatar
Coops
Posts: 8411
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Rayleigh, Essex
Has liked: 449 likes
Total likes: 590 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Coops »

Ilford Paolo wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 1:48 pm Just read Jack Elderton's player by player analysis of the Wolves match.Lots to agree with including the Bowen 4/10 but Cresswell at 7/10 ? :crylol:
Bowen seems to get a bit of a free pass, probably due to how good he was last season, but he has been as much at fault as anybody else.
User avatar
Ironing Board
Posts: 22195
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:11 am
Has liked: 2082 likes
Total likes: 1802 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Ironing Board »

I was rather disappointed in Paqueta against Wolves. I had thought there were signs of life in prior games but he was very poor/anonymous.
User avatar
il_martello_di_genovesi
Posts: 16900
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:11 pm
Location: genova è solo blucerchiata.
Has liked: 688 likes
Total likes: 2035 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by il_martello_di_genovesi »

ornchurch ammer wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 10:37 am It’s funny that all the excuses thar are made for Scamacca are also not applied to Antonio.
One has played about 10 games while being used as a target man. The other is on a clear decline. What excuses are they? I never even mentioned Antonio. Are you going to deny what I said then? Was Scamacca’s last league goal not a ball played to his feet by a Leeds player? It’s a weird post to pick up on to defend Antonio.
User avatar
Ironing Board
Posts: 22195
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:11 am
Has liked: 2082 likes
Total likes: 1802 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Ironing Board »

il_martello_di_genovesi wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:25 pm One has played about 10 games while being used as a target man. The other is on a clear decline. What excuses are they? I never even mentioned Antonio. Are you going to deny what I said then? Was Scamacca’s last league goal not a ball played to his feet by a Leeds player? It’s a weird post to pick up on to defend Antonio.
Don’t think you can say he’s being used as a target man. But he doesn’t have the speed to play the sort of role we need of him. We need a mobile forward who can drag defenders out of position and he just doesn’t have that from what I’ve seen. He may even bet better as the deeper striker/10 but we still need the fast lad ahead of him.

I think Sully cut off his nose to spite his face with Arnautovic as he is exactly what we need.
Last edited by Ironing Board on Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
kitthehammer
Posts: 12351
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 1:11 am
Location: way out west in Egham
Has liked: 74 likes
Total likes: 302 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by kitthehammer »

Ironing Board wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:12 pm I was rather disappointed in Paqueta against Wolves. I had thought there were signs of life in prior games but he was very poor/anonymous.
not that he was the only one but he also did several passes that were too weak.
User avatar
il_martello_di_genovesi
Posts: 16900
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:11 pm
Location: genova è solo blucerchiata.
Has liked: 688 likes
Total likes: 2035 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by il_martello_di_genovesi »

Ironing Board wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:12 pm I was rather disappointed in Paqueta against Wolves. I had thought there were signs of life in prior games but he was very poor/anonymous.
Not really much of an analysis is it IB. In three of those previous games he wasn’t shunted into a redundant number 10 role.
User avatar
Ironing Board
Posts: 22195
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:11 am
Has liked: 2082 likes
Total likes: 1802 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Ironing Board »

kitthehammer wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:29 pm not that he was the only one but he also did several passes that were too weak.
Yeah, I cannot work the fella out at all. He doesn’t really seem good at anything considering how much he cost. Hopefully he plays better on Saturday.
User avatar
Ironing Board
Posts: 22195
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:11 am
Has liked: 2082 likes
Total likes: 1802 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Ironing Board »

il_martello_di_genovesi wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:31 pm Not really much of an analysis is it IB. In three of those previous games he wasn’t shunted into a redundant number 10 role.
It wasn’t meant to be. But his passing was poor and he was pretty much anonymous. There have been other games where he wasn’t great where he at least got involved a lot.
User avatar
HammerMan2004
Posts: 26911
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:01 pm
Location: I have no idea.
Has liked: 526 likes
Total likes: 1319 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by HammerMan2004 »

Ironing Board wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:12 pm I was rather disappointed in Paqueta against Wolves. I had thought there were signs of life in prior games but he was very poor/anonymous.
Symptomatic of just how bad we are all over the place. We've put Paqueta deep where people wanted to see him, so when he gets the ball on the half turn, who can he look up and play the ball to? Soucek and Antonio. Cool.

There's no surprise he looked better for the extremely short period of time recently that he's been surrounded by Fornals / Benrahma / Scamacca. Geezers that can actually control or pass a football.
User avatar
Ironing Board
Posts: 22195
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:11 am
Has liked: 2082 likes
Total likes: 1802 likes

Re: ⚽ Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Ironing Board »

HammerMan2004 wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 3:37 pm Symptomatic of just how bad we are all over the place. We've put Paqueta deep where people wanted to see him, so when he gets the ball on the half turn, who can he look up and play the ball to? Soucek and Antonio. Cool.

There's no surprise he looked better for the extremely short period of time recently that he's been surrounded by Fornals / Benrahma / Scamacca. Geezers that can actually control or pass a football.
Fornals had a poor game too. That being said, we seemed to lose all our solidity without Soucek and Fornals in there, though some said it was because we were chasing the game. Looked more to me like we lost their defensive contributions and positional discipline.
Post Reply