✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
Moderators: Wilko1304, Rio, bristolhammerfc, the pink palermo, chalks, Gnome, last.caress
- poplargeezer
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 10:37 pm
- Location: Barry Island/Wakefield
- Has liked: 19 likes
- Total likes: 9 likes
- Contact:
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
Is he jinxed?
Can't understand why Moyes didn't call Downes back from his loan.
Can't understand why Moyes didn't call Downes back from his loan.
- OFT
- Posts: 23346
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:59 pm
- Location: Sleepin’ in a bayou on a old rotten cot
- Has liked: 3881 likes
- Total likes: 2193 likes
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
With great regret I think you're correct. I hate the fact that it's gone so wrong for him but I wouldn't even bench him again. His confidence looks shot to pieces.
Sad
- Ironing Board
- Posts: 23927
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:11 am
- Has liked: 2049 likes
- Total likes: 1822 likes
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
Phillips did nothing wrong when he came on. Fact is, he was the person who was wronged by the referee and the morons in VAR and should be getting defended rather than slagged off.
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 6:49 am
- Location: Deepest darkest Kent
- Total likes: 2 likes
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
I think his defending of the last goal is the bigger mistakeIroning Board wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 2:52 pm Phillips did nothing wrong when he came on. Fact is, he was the person who was wronged by the referee and the morons in VAR and should be getting defended rather than slagged off.
- norse
- Posts: 8238
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 8:41 am
- Location: cold north
- Has liked: 355 likes
- Total likes: 828 likes
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
I know he had a tough upbringing, seems a nice lad and has shown human emotions.
However, he is one of the worst players I have seen play for West Ham. Don't care if he's a Manchester City star or whatever, he's not a PL player now.
Carlos Sanchez could only dream of costing us points every time he stepped on the pitch, this one does it with ease.
However, he is one of the worst players I have seen play for West Ham. Don't care if he's a Manchester City star or whatever, he's not a PL player now.
Carlos Sanchez could only dream of costing us points every time he stepped on the pitch, this one does it with ease.
- simon hammer
- Posts: 18774
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 3:03 pm
- Location: ...somewhere between deliverance and damnation...
- Has liked: 1138 likes
- Total likes: 823 likes
- Contact:
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
Should have stuck his foot through the ball instead of taking a touch imo. Huge mistake right there.
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
He was too slow, should have cleared it earlier, and he was walking back not even trying to defend against Barnes or the rest of the Newcastle midfield for the winner. He is both $hit and cursed. He has given away 2 direct goals, 2 penalties and his lack of pace /application/effort has cost us another 2 more - 6 goals and a minimum of 6 points, more realistically 8… and he has only played 360 minutes. He is completely finished as a top flight footballer.Ironing Board wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 2:52 pm Phillips did nothing wrong when he came on. Fact is, he was the person who was wronged by the referee and the morons in VAR and should be getting defended rather than slagged off.
-
- Posts: 17251
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:11 pm
- Has liked: 711 likes
- Total likes: 2048 likes
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
That is complete and utter b*llocks. He's in the middle of clearing the thing FFS.
- Ironing Board
- Posts: 23927
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:11 am
- Has liked: 2049 likes
- Total likes: 1822 likes
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
Only if you take the harshest view of every tiny error. For example, at least one of the goals was due to a suicide pass putting him in a very bad position. Today, maybe he could have done better with the second, but it was a fast breakaway and a pinpoint pass, much like Paqueta's earlier for our goal. The penalty decision totally changed the outcome of the game and it was a foul of on Phillips or a 50/50 no decision at best and yet the referee and the morons in the video portacabin decide to make it a penalty.Peaches wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 3:01 pm He was too slow, should have cleared it earlier, and he was walking back not even trying to defend against Barnes or the rest of the Newcastle midfield for the winner. He is both $hit and cursed. He has given away 2 direct goals, 2 penalties and his lack of pace /application/effort has cost us another 2 more - 6 goals and a minimum of 6 points, more realistically 8… and he has only played 360 minutes. He is completely finished as a top flight footballer.
- paulhs1
- Posts: 12245
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 2:32 pm
- Location: Just South of the Thames
- Has liked: 1528 likes
- Total likes: 1093 likes
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
Could you imagine the insanity of having had the perfect opportunity to "try before you buy" that we then decide to give £40m+ for this bloke in the summer
Last edited by paulhs1 on Sat Mar 30, 2024 3:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- MD_HM
- Posts: 7873
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:00 am
- Location: London
- Has liked: 37 likes
- Total likes: 341 likes
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
First of all it was never a penalty in a million years
Half way through clearing the ball Gordon stick his leg in front of him, if anything a foul on Phillips for anyone that's played football.
The biggest problem he has is he is always brought on on for the wrong player, if it had been Fornals or Lanzini if still here for Antonio it would have been equally as wrong.
Today if you were bringing on Phillips then it should have been for Soucek or JWP, that's the massive problem.
Realistically, it's Soucek but with Moyes that ain't happening and it's messing up the balance of the team.
The problem wasn't Phillips coming on, it was Antonio coming off
Half way through clearing the ball Gordon stick his leg in front of him, if anything a foul on Phillips for anyone that's played football.
The biggest problem he has is he is always brought on on for the wrong player, if it had been Fornals or Lanzini if still here for Antonio it would have been equally as wrong.
Today if you were bringing on Phillips then it should have been for Soucek or JWP, that's the massive problem.
Realistically, it's Soucek but with Moyes that ain't happening and it's messing up the balance of the team.
The problem wasn't Phillips coming on, it was Antonio coming off
- D C
- Posts: 12545
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 5:14 pm
- Location: More soul than a sock with a hole.
- Has liked: 1009 likes
- Total likes: 1309 likes
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
I had high hopes that he could come in and replace Soucek in the starting 11, making us a better footballing side. Crazy in hindsight I admit
When Moyes started that historically poor midfield combination of Soucek and JWP I thought ‘wow Phillips must look horrendous in training’. His cameo probably backs that up
I think the penalty was an awful decision personally. Ignoring that though he just might as well have been another training cone out there like JWP and Soucek. All so easily passed around. Soucek at least defends well when he’s on the edge of or in his own box. The other two have no fight or personality.
When Moyes started that historically poor midfield combination of Soucek and JWP I thought ‘wow Phillips must look horrendous in training’. His cameo probably backs that up
I think the penalty was an awful decision personally. Ignoring that though he just might as well have been another training cone out there like JWP and Soucek. All so easily passed around. Soucek at least defends well when he’s on the edge of or in his own box. The other two have no fight or personality.
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
On page 3 of this thread I asked what the loan fee was.
Still don't know the answer, what I do know is we are getting more bang for our buck out of baroness effing Brady than we are getting out of KP.
By comparison Danny Ings is looking better value for money spent than our outlay on Alan Devonshire.
Still don't know the answer, what I do know is we are getting more bang for our buck out of baroness effing Brady than we are getting out of KP.
By comparison Danny Ings is looking better value for money spent than our outlay on Alan Devonshire.
- Ironing Board
- Posts: 23927
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:11 am
- Has liked: 2049 likes
- Total likes: 1822 likes
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
Yea, but we don't have a like-for-like replacement, so you shuffle the system. We were already under the cosh before Phillips came on and it made sense to try and tighten things up at that time.
- prophet:marginal
- Posts: 44353
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 8:54 pm
- Location: Got Into Something
- Has liked: 846 likes
- Total likes: 2116 likes
- MD_HM
- Posts: 7873
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:00 am
- Location: London
- Has liked: 37 likes
- Total likes: 341 likes
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
Why change a working system unless you have to, there was no need for the subIroning Board wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 3:13 pm Yea, but we don't have a like-for-like replacement, so you shuffle the system. We were already under the cosh before Phillips came on and it made sense to try and tighten things up at that time.
Mubama for Antonio IF he was injured/knackered
If you want to bring Phillips on then it's for Soucek or JWP
Every time we mess with systems it doesn't work
-
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2022 8:17 pm
- Has liked: 1191 likes
- Total likes: 409 likes
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
Have to agree, as we were in control.. pretty much. No need for any change (unless it was like for or like).
- Ironing Board
- Posts: 23927
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:11 am
- Has liked: 2049 likes
- Total likes: 1822 likes
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
Because we need to protect Antonio. There are much more important games coming up where he could be a key player.
And it has worked in the past, like when Paqueta was switched to false nine. Howe actually got lucky as he only brought Barnes on due to injury to another sub!
Re: ✍ Welcome, Kalvin Phillips
Why always KP?Ironing Board wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 2:52 pm Phillips did nothing wrong when he came on. Fact is, he was the person who was wronged by the referee and the morons in VAR and should be getting defended rather than slagged off.